Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rakesh mishra · Page 1 of about 139 results (0.036 seconds)

Sep 10 2003

Gopi Krishna Mehrotra Vs. Allahabad Bank Through Chairman and Managing ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-10-2003

Subject : ServiceLimitation

Acts : Officer Employees' (Conduct) Regulations - Regulation 17; Discipline and Appeal Regulations - Regulation 21

Reported in : (2004)1UPLBEC71

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Tandon, ;Sudhir Mehrotra and ;S.K. Mehrotra, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. The petitioner was working as Branch Manager in the Allahabad Bank and in the year 1982, the disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him and a charge-sheet was served on 25.6.1982. After enquiry, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2017

Mayank Shekhar Saran Vs. Mahendra Mohan Gupta .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jun-19-2017

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Mishra

1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.411 OF2014WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.246 OF2011IN AVISHEK RAJA & ORS. ...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS SANJAY GUPTA ...RESPONDENT(S) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (CIVIL) No.33 OF2015IN WP...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 17 2018

District Basic Education Officer Allahabad Vs. Sushila Jaiswal (Dead) ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-17-2018

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Mishra

1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5628 OF2018(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.28895 of 2017) District Basic Education Officer Allahabad ………Appellant VERSUS Sushila Jaiswal (Dead) through her...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works

Oct 30 2003

Satya Narayan Pandey and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-30-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1966 - Rule 19; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 220 to 223 and 228; Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227 and 311(2)

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT46

Advocate for Appellant : M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, Adv.

ORDERRajendra Menon, J.1. As common questions are involved in all these three petitions, they are being disposed of by this common order.1. In W.P. No. 2315/2003, petitioner Satya Narayan Pandey who was working as Head Constable...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 19 2017