Advanced Search Results
Krishna Gold and Silver Thread Mills Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Feb-27-1980
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rule 58
ILR1980Delhi173; 1980LabIC887
Mr. Rakesh Kanwar
Leila Seth, J. (1) The petitioner-employer by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays a writ of certiorari to quash the certificate dated 23rd October, 1969 issued by the Labour Commissioner; Delhi,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJai Parabolics Springs Ltd. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anothe ...
Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh
Jan-24-2001
Land Acquisition
Dr. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1. The complainant M/s. Jai Parabolics Springs Ltd., A-30(a), Phase 7, Industrial Area, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali has filed this complaint under Section 2-C read with Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSher Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
Nov-25-2005
Labour and Industrial
Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 4A, 4A(3) and 10; ;Limitation Act - Section 21 and 21(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17
2006ACJ2367
Rakesh Kanwar, Adv.
Deepak Gupta, J.1. The main appeal and the application filed are being taken up together for hearing with the consent of the parties.2. The facts necessary for decision of the case are that Sher Singh filed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Punjab National Bank, Delhi and Etc. Vs. Prem Sagar Choudhary and ors.
Himachal Pradesh
May-18-1987
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 1, 1(3), 1(4) and 1(5); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 60
AIR1988HP33,[1989]66CompCas526(HP)
K.D. Sood and; Rakesh Kanwar, Advs.
ORDERV.P. Bhatnagar, J.1. When would interest cease to run on the payments made towards the discharge of the interest-bearing decretal amount, is the main question which falls for determination in these cases. This would, in turn,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHimachal Pradesh Financial Corporation Vs. Tourist Hotel and Restauran ...
Himachal Pradesh
May-02-1989
Commercial
State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 32
[1991]71CompCas492(HP)
D.K. Khanna, Adv. in F.A.O. No. 108 of 1982,; Rakesh Kanwar, Adv. in F.A.O. No. 130 of 1982 and;
N.M. Kasliwal, C.J.1. We would narrate the facts of F. A. O. No. 108 of 1982, as the order of reference has been made initially in the above appeal.2. The Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMaster Puran Chandel Vs. Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education
Himachal Pradesh
Jun-08-1988
Constitution
Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Regulations - Regulation 7
AIR1989HP14
Rakesh Kanwar, Adv.
V.K. Mehrotra, Actg. C.J. 1. We have heard the learned counsel and also considered the averments made in the petition and the reply filed on behalf of the respondent.2. As directed by us earlier, the respondent...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Lal Vs. State of H.P.
Himachal Pradesh
May-12-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act - Section 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 207
2006CriLJ939
Anup Chitkara, Adv.
Surjit Singh, J.1. Appellant Ram Lal has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 20-4-2000 of learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1999, whereby he has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Vidya Devi and Etc.
Himachal Pradesh
Apr-19-1993
CriminalNarcotics
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 50(1), 51, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(3), 52A, 52A(2), 53, 55, 57, 58, 61 and 62; ;Opium Act, 1957; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4(2), 5, 156 and 190; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules
1993CriLJ3556
R.K. Sharma, Dy. Adv. General
Bhawani Singh, Actg. C.J.1. Certain provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter shortly the Act') came for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sudarshan...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›