Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rakesh kanwar · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.039 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 27 1980

Krishna Gold and Silver Thread Mills Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-27-1980

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rule 58

Reported in : ILR1980Delhi173; 1980LabIC887

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rakesh Kanwar

Leila Seth, J. (1) The petitioner-employer by this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prays a writ of certiorari to quash the certificate dated 23rd October, 1969 issued by the Labour Commissioner; Delhi,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2001

Jai Parabolics Springs Ltd. Vs. National Insurance Co. Ltd. and Anothe ...

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Decided on : Jan-24-2001

Subject : Land Acquisition

Dr. P.K. Vasudeva, Member: 1. The complainant M/s. Jai Parabolics Springs Ltd., A-30(a), Phase 7, Industrial Area, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali has filed this complaint under Section 2-C read with Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 25 2005

Sher Singh Vs. Rakesh Kumar and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-25-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 4A, 4A(3) and 10; ;Limitation Act - Section 21 and 21(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10 - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2006ACJ2367

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kanwar, Adv.

Deepak Gupta, J.1. The main appeal and the application filed are being taken up together for hearing with the consent of the parties.2. The facts necessary for decision of the case are that Sher Singh filed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 18 1987

Punjab National Bank, Delhi and Etc. Vs. Prem Sagar Choudhary and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-18-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 21, Rule 1, 1(3), 1(4) and 1(5); ;Contract Act, 1872 - Section 60

Reported in : AIR1988HP33,[1989]66CompCas526(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : K.D. Sood and; Rakesh Kanwar, Advs.

ORDERV.P. Bhatnagar, J.1. When would interest cease to run on the payments made towards the discharge of the interest-bearing decretal amount, is the main question which falls for determination in these cases. This would, in turn,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 1989

Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation Vs. Tourist Hotel and Restauran ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-02-1989

Subject : Commercial

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 31 and 32

Reported in : [1991]71CompCas492(HP)

Advocate for Appellant : D.K. Khanna, Adv. in F.A.O. No. 108 of 1982,; Rakesh Kanwar, Adv. in F.A.O. No. 130 of 1982 and;

N.M. Kasliwal, C.J.1. We would narrate the facts of F. A. O. No. 108 of 1982, as the order of reference has been made initially in the above appeal.2. The Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation (hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1988

Master Puran Chandel Vs. Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-1988

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Himachal Pradesh Board of School Education Regulations - Regulation 7

Reported in : AIR1989HP14

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kanwar, Adv.

V.K. Mehrotra, Actg. C.J. 1. We have heard the learned counsel and also considered the averments made in the petition and the reply filed on behalf of the respondent.2. As directed by us earlier, the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 12 2005

Ram Lal Vs. State of H.P.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : May-12-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Section 32; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300, 302 and 304; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 207

Reported in : 2006CriLJ939

Advocate for Appellant : Anup Chitkara, Adv.

Surjit Singh, J.1. Appellant Ram Lal has preferred this appeal against the judgment dated 20-4-2000 of learned Sessions Judge, Kinnaur Sessions Division at Rampur Bushahr in Sessions Trial No. 8 of 1999, whereby he has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1993

State Vs. Vidya Devi and Etc.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-19-1993

Subject : CriminalNarcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37, 41, 41(1), 41(2), 42, 42(1), 42(2), 43, 44, 45, 48, 49, 50, 50(1), 51, 52, 52(1), 52(2), 52(3), 52A, 52A(2), 53, 55, 57, 58, 61 and 62; ;Opium Act, 1957; ;Opium Act, 1878; ;Dangerous Drugs Act, 1930; ;Customs Act, 1962; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2, 4(2), 5, 156 and 190; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Rules

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3556

Advocate for Appellant : R.K. Sharma, Dy. Adv. General

Bhawani Singh, Actg. C.J.1. Certain provisions of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter shortly the Act') came for consideration before the Division Bench of this Court in State of Himachal Pradesh v. Sudarshan...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial