Advanced Search Results
Krishna and anr. Vs. State of U.P.
Supreme Court of India
Jun-21-2007
Criminal
Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 105; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 96 to 98, 99, 100 to 106, 302, 307, 323 and 504
AIR2007SC2452; 2007CriLJ3525; JT2007(9)SC184; 2007(8)SCALE634; 2007(2)LC803(SC); 2007AIRSCW4372; 2007LawHerald(SC)2204; (2007)3Crimes77(SC)
Rakesh Garg, Adv. (A.C.
Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Leave granted. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dismissing the appeal filed by the appellants. The trial Court i.e. learned IInd...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSimla Devi Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-21-2006
Service
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226
(2006)143PLR272
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. Although the petitioner has approached this Court on umpteen times yet her grievances have remained un-redressed. This is another petition filed by her under Article 226 of the Constitution with a prayer for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPratibha Gupta and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Feb-09-1998
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15 and 226
AIR1998P& H211
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
G. S. Singhvi, J. 1. In terms of the directions given by this Court on December 18, 1992 in C.W.P. No. 8789 of 1992 laying down the criteria for admission by migration, the Government of Punjab...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Satish Chander Gupta and Sons Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-04-2002
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
2003(1)ARBLR589(P& H); (2003)133PLR164
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
Viney Mittal, J. 1. The petitioner has approached this court through the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for declaring the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaldeep Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Mar-16-1992
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 194A, 194A(1), 202 and 204
(1992)106CTR(P& H)162; [1993]199ITR628(P& H)
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
Ashok Bhan, J.1. This judgment of mine shall dispose of a bunch of 174 Revision Petitions Nos. 88, 313, 483 to 490, 625, 626, 682 to 700, 727 to 731, 741 to 754, 767 to 769,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJagir Singh Balraj Kumar and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-22-1997
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256(1), 256(2), 269SS and 271D
[1999]235ITR146(P& H)
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
N.K. Agrawal, J. 1. This is an application by the assessee under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), seeking a direction to the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (for short, 'the Tribunal'), to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunicipal Committee Vs. Labour Court and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Dec-10-1993
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C(2)
[1992(65)FLR105]; (1995)ILLJ867P& H
Rakesh Garg, Adv.
V.K. Bali, J. 1. This order will dispose of two petitions bearing Nos. 5989 and 5994 of 1988 as the law point involved in both the petitions is the same.2. The facts of Civil Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGirdhari Lal Vs. Cit
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-20-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]119TAXMAN863(Punj& Har)
A.K. Mittal, Akshay Man and Rakesh Garg, for the Assessee R.P. Sawhney and Rajesh Bindal, for the Revenue
Gupta, J. This order shall dispose of five appeals, viz., Income Tax Appeal Nos. 5, 36 to 38 of 1999 and 51 of 2000. The learned counsels for the parties have referred to the facts as...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Garg Traders
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-10-2001
Direct Taxation
[2001]119TAXMAN733(Punj& Har)
R.P. Sawhney and Rajesh Bindal, for the Revenue Rakesh Garg, for the Assessee
ORDERGupta, J. This is a petition under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The revenue prays that the Tribunal be directed to refer the following question of law...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCourt of Its Own Motion Vs. Rakesh Garg Etc.
Punjab and Haryana
Nov-29-1991
Family
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 13B(2)
(1992)101PLR346
V.P. Gupta, Adv. for the Sampda
S.S. Sodhi, J.1. The matter here concerns the grant of a decree for mutual divorce under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), or to be more precise, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »