Advanced Search Results

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Through Registrar Vs. Sarnam Sin ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Rules of Court, 1952; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 399/402; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25; Constitution of India - Articles 235 and 309; Uttar Pradesh Judicial Officers (Retirement on Superannuation) Rules, 1992 - Rules 2, 4 and 56

Reported in : [2000(84)FLR444]; JT1999(10)SC99; 1999(7)SCALE502; (2000)2SCC339; [1999]Supp5SCR344; 2000(1)LC196(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC242

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi and; Ashok K. Srivastava, Advs

S. Saghir Ahmad, J.1. Leave granted.2. Sarnam Singh (respondent No. 1), who shall hereinafter be referred to as respondent, was compulsorily retired from service by order dated 12.11.1997 passed by the State Government on the recommendation...

Mukesh Kumar Agrawal Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3 and 7; Uttar Pradesh High Speed Diesel Oil and Light Diesel Oil (Maintenance of Supplies and Distribution) Order, 1981

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC537(SC); JT2009(13)SC643; (2009)13SCC693

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv.,; Vishwajit Singh and; Siddharth Sen

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Appellant is before us aggrieved by and dissatisfied with a judgment and order dated 4.2.2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Writ Petition...

Ram Preet Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 82, 83, 439 and 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 406

Reported in : 1990CriLJ400

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi, Adv.

ORDERS.I. Jafri, J.1. Heard Sri Rakesh Dwivedi, learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned counsel for the State,2. This application is under Section 439/482, Cr.P.C. seeking the relief of bail to the applicant.3....

Bihar Distillery and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Constitution of India; Industries (Regulation and Development) Act, 1951 - Sections 2 and 18G; Bihar Excise Act; Uttar Pradesh Excise Rules - Rule 45

Reported in : AIR1997SC1208; JT1997(2)SC20; 1997(1)SCALE573; (1997)2SCC727; [1997]1SCR680

Advocate for Appellant : M.S. Usgaonkar, Addl. Solicitor General,; Rakesh Dwivedi, Addl. Adv. General,;

ORDERB.P. Jeevan Reddy, J.1. Until the commencement of the Constitution and for a few years thereafter, rectified spirit was mainly used for the purpose of manufacturing country liquor, Indian Made Foreign Liquors (IMFL) and other intoxicating...

Kunwar Pal Singh Rathi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 136, 141, 142, 144, 151, 151(2), 166(3), 194, 205, 206, 226, 227 and 267; Uttar Pradesh Contingency Fund Act, 1950 - Sections 5 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Contingency Fund Rules, 1962 - Rules 3, 216, 229, 230 and 230(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 173(8); Uttar Pradesh Lokayuktas Act, 1975 - Sections 2

Reported in : 2001(4)AWC3104

Advocate for Appellant : Siddharth and ;Rakesh Dwivedi, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J. 1. Kunwar Pal Singh Rathi claiming himself to be a media person has brought, in public interest, the petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and has prayed for the following...

Prof. Yashpal and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2005SC2026; 2005(2)ESC129; JT2005(2)SC165; (2005)5SCC420; [2005] 2 SCR 23

G.P. Mathur, J.1. Professor Yashpal, an eminent Scientist and former Chairman of University Grants Commission, has filed Writ Petition No.19 of 2004 under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation for declaring...

Tata Teleservices Ltd. Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 - Sections 11, 11(1), 13 and 36; Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Amendment) Act, 2000; Indian Telegraph Act - Sections 4; Telecommunication Interconnection Usage Charges Regulations, 2003 - Rule 6

Reported in : 2008BusLR482(SC); (2008)2CompLJ405(SC); JT2008(5)SC657; 2008(6)SCALE523; (2008)10SCC556; [2008] 7 SCR 308

Advocate for Appellant : Gopal Subramanium and; Vikas Singh, ASGs,; Arun Jaitley,;

S.H. Kapadia, J.1. The controversy in these civil appeals is: whether appellant is liable to pay Access Deficit Charges ('ADC') to BSNL for the period commencing from 14.11.2004 to 26.8.2005 in respect of its service provided...

Mrs. Usha Saini Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 8(1) and 13; Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 - Rule 100; Constitution of India - Articles 51A and 226

Reported in : 142(2007)DLT397

Advocate for Appellant : G.D. Gupta, Sr. Adv. and; S.N. Gupta, Adv

Kailash Gambhir, J.1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the result of the DPC held on 17.2.2006 whereby the petitioner was declared not suitable for the post of Principal. The petitioner has...

Ms. Purbanchal Cables and Conductors Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Assam State Electri ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : LimitationConstitution

Acts : Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 - Section 1(3), 2(b), 3, 4, 5, 6(1)(2), 10; Limitation Act 1963 - Section 14, 10, 29 (2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Section 34; Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Section 61; Interest Act, 1978 - Section 3; Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 61(2); Gaming Act, 1845 - Section 18; Trade Disputes Act, 1906 - Section 4; Constitution of India - Articles 141; Indian Contracts Act - Section 62

H.L. DATTU, J.1. Since the issues in these appeals are common, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order. Factual background of the two appeals2. The facts in brief needs to be stated for...

Radhey Shyam Sharma Vs. Regional Transport Authority, Kathgodam, Naini ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 59, 69, 77, 79, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 88, 88(12) and (14) and 89; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 19(1); Central Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Rules, 1989 - Rules 88 and 88(2); National Permits Rules, 1975 - Rule 6; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(1B), (1D), (1F) and (1G), 51, 51(2), 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59A, 60, 61, 63(11) and (15) and 64; Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1980 - Rule 88; Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1976; Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules - Rule 63(1)

Reported in : AIR1991All158

Advocate for Appellant : M.M. Ghildyal, Adv.

ORDERR.A. Sharma, J.1. By these writ petitions, petitioners, who are holding national permits for carriage of goods, have challenged the validity of R.6 of National Permit Rules, 1975, framed under S. 63(11) of the Motor Vehicles...