Advanced Search Results

Ravi Shanker Vs. Joint Cit

Court : Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2004)90TTJ(Del)340

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Singhal & Ramit Kakar,;for the assessed; Ram Vilash Meena,;for the Revenue

ORDERS.C. TIWARI, A.M.These 8 appeals have been filed by the assessed on 26-9-2000, against the order of the learned Commissioner (Appeals)-I, Meerut, dated 27-7-2000, in the case of the assessed in relation to assessment order under...

Sebi Vs. Shreepati Holdings and Finance

Court : SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Subject : Service Tax

1.1 Sun Infoways Limited (hereinafter referred to as "SIL") promoted by Shri Shrikant Vasant Joglekar and Shri Sujit Shrikant Joglekar was incorporated on June 29, 1994 as Best Mulyankan Consultants Pvt. Ltd. The main object of...

Haryana Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. K. Singhal ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Reported in : [2001]104CompCas338(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

V.S. Aggarwal, J. 1. M/s. Haryana Drugs and Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (in liquidation) was ordered to be wound up by this court on 6.1.1995. The Official Liquidator attached to this court was appointed as liquidator of the...

Amar Kaur and anr. Vs. Naresh Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1), 25B and 25B(8); Evidence Act - Sections 116

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)115; 97(2002)DLT772; 2002(62)DRJ401

Advocate for Appellant : H.K. Nahata, Adv

R.C. Chopra, J. 1. This revision under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' only) assails an order dated 9.7.2001 passed by learned Additional Rent Controller, Delhi dismissing the...

S.A. Satsangi Vs. Prem Kumar

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1), 25B and 25B(8); Slum Area Clearance Act - Sections 19(1); Evidence Act - Sections 116; MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961; Rent Control Law

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)829; 98(2002)DLT11; 2002(64)DRJ148

Advocate for Appellant : V.B. Andley, Sr. Adv.,; Rajinder Mathur and; Sandeep Kapur

R.C. CHOPRA, J.1. This revision petition assails an order dated 25.9.2000 passed by learned Additional Rent Controller, Delhi by which the respondent's petition was allowed and an eviction order under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25B...

Shri Mohd. Yameen Vs. Mohd. Saleem Khan and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act - Sections 14(1) and 25B(8)

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT476; 2003(66)DRJ268

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Dhalla, Adv

R.C. Chopra, J.1. This petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only) is directed against an order dated 7th May, 2001 passed by the Additional Rent Controller...

Hira Lal Pukhraj and ors. Vs. Prem Kishan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : CivilTenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 96 - Order 41, Rules 27 and 31; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13 and 14(2)

Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2358; 2004(3)WLC591

Advocate for Appellant : N.K. Maloo and; V.K. Tamoliya, Advs.

A.C. Goyal, J.1. This is the second appeal by the tenants against the concurrent judgment and decree of eviction. The parties in this appeal would be referred as arrayed in the plaint.2. The relevant facts in...

Sanjeev JaIn Vs State Thru Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code Of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) - Sections 482.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arvind K. Nigam, Sr. ; Mr. Samrat Nigam ; Mr. Satish Kumar, Advs.

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes.3. Whether judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes. 1. On directions of this...

Bhajan Singh Samra Vs. M/S.Wimpy International Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Section 433(e) read with Sections 434, 439, 434(1)(a); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 120-B; Limitation Act, 1963 - Section 18(1)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Anand Varma, Adv.

1. Present petition has been filed under Section 433(e) read with Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (for short 'Act') stating that the respondent-company is unable to pay its debt allegedly amounting to...

Mahtab and ors. Vs. Abdul Wahid

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: January 06, 2014 + RC. Rev. No.22/2013 & C.M. No.719/2013 MAHTAB & ORS Through ..... Petitioners Mr.R.L. Kohli, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Varun Yadav...