Advanced Search Results

Association of Corporation and Apex Societies of Handlooms Vs. State o ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)769; 81(1999)DLT457; 1999(51)DRJ110; ILR1999Delhi465

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate,; Messrs Uttam Dutt and;Rohit Madan Advs

ORDER1. The petitioner through the present application has sought an order to interdict respondent No. 1, their officers, employees and agents from encashing the bank guarantee dated March 5, 1997 issued at their instance by respondent...

Govind and ors. Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120, 294, 323, 384, 406, 498A and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 320(9) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)525; 104(2003)DLT510; I(2003)DMC783; 2003(68)DRJ446; 2003(2)JCC1030

Advocate for Appellant : Rambir Singh, Adv. in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1295/2002,; Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,;

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. By this judgment we propose to finally dispose of Criminal Writ Petition Nos.1295 of 2002, 758 of 2002 and 917 of 2002. Although Criminal Writ Petition No. 1295 of 2002 was disposed of...

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Kewal Krishan Kohli

Court : Delhi

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 65(1997)DLT753

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar and; P.R. Agarwal, Advs

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The fact that the plaintiff is the landlord and the defendant is the tenant is not disputed. The defendant was let into the possession as a tenant on 1.12.1975, the whole of the...

Living Media India Limited and anr. Vs. Office of the Chief Postmater ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT228; 2007(96)DRJ583

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,; Pallavi Bangar and; Meenakshi Chatt

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the communication dated 08.11.2005 from the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Postmaster General, Delhi Circle, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner was informed that the...

Sanjay Chandra and ors. Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 439, 170, 161, 164, 88, 437, 498, 173(8); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471; PC (Prevention Of Corruption) Act - Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d); Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ram Jethmalani; Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi; Mr. Pinaki Mishra; Ms. Ritu Bhalla; Mr. Sushil Bajaj; Ms. Rebecca M. John, Advs.

1. Accused Sanjay Chandra, Vinod Goenka, Gautam Doshi, Hari Nair and Surendra Pipara vide above referred applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are seeking bail in case FIR No.RC-DAI-2009-A-0045 P.S. ACB, CBI New Delhi under Section 420,...

Arun Kapur Vs. Vikram Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Arbitration Act - Sections 5, 16 and 17; Companies Act

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi420; 95(2002)DLT42; 2002(61)DRJ495a

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,; Vibhu Bhakru and; Arvind Dutt,

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. This order shall dispose of the main petition as well as the application under Order 39 Rule CPC. 2. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

S.C. Dubey Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and IndustrialConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 86(2000)DLT523

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate and; Mr.C. Mukund, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The second respondent is a public sector undertaking engaged in the manufacture of electronic instruments and manufacture of colour TVs and engaged in other activities with reference to electronics. The Headquarters of...

J.B. Dadachanji Vs. Ravinder NaraIn and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(3), 9, 11(5), 11(6), 13 and 16; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 7, Rule 11; Partnership Act, 1932 - Sections 44; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 34; Companies Act

Reported in : 99(2002)DLT663

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and B.A. Ranganathan, Adv. in AA No. 122/2000 and OMP No. 60/2000,; V.P. Singh, S

D.K. Jain, J.1. Over four decades ago, three eminent lawyers, JBD, RN and OCM decided to carry on their profession jointly as a firm under the name and style of J.B. Dadachanji & Co., little Realizing...

Wind Power Limited Vs. Goyal Mg Gases Limited

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 34 and 151

Reported in : 2003IIAD(Delhi)585; 2003(1)ARBLR667(Delhi); 103(2003)DLT611; 2003(2)RAJ243

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. and; Siddharth Datta, Adv

R.C. Jain, J. 1. The respondent M/s. Goyal MG Gases Limited has filed this application under Section 151 CPC praying for a direction on the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) to start paying to the respondent...

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Arun Jaitley,; Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Senior Advocate, and;

ORDERAnil Dev Singh, J.1. These two petitions raise common questions. thereforee, both the writ petitions are being disposed of together. The first petitioner, AAA Film Motion Picture Producers, is a sole proprietary firm of the second...