Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajiv nayar · Page 1 of about 477 results (0.115 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 01 1999

Association of Corporation and Apex Societies of Handlooms Vs. State o ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-1999

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCommercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : 1999VAD(Delhi)769; 81(1999)DLT457; 1999(51)DRJ110; ILR1999Delhi465

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate,; Messrs Uttam Dutt and;Rohit Madan Advs

ORDER1. The petitioner through the present application has sought an order to interdict respondent No. 1, their officers, employees and agents from encashing the bank guarantee dated March 5, 1997 issued at their instance by respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 2003

Govind and ors. Vs. the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-07-2003

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120, 294, 323, 384, 406, 498A and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 320(9) and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 32 and 226

Reported in : 2003IIIAD(Delhi)525; 104(2003)DLT510; I(2003)DMC783; 2003(68)DRJ446; 2003(2)JCC1030

Advocate for Appellant : Rambir Singh, Adv. in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1295/2002,; Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,;

Dalveer Bhandari, J.1. By this judgment we propose to finally dispose of Criminal Writ Petition Nos.1295 of 2002, 758 of 2002 and 917 of 2002. Although Criminal Writ Petition No. 1295 of 2002 was disposed of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 28 2007

Living Media India Limited and anr. Vs. Office of the Chief Postmater ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-28-2007

Subject : Media and Communication

Acts : Indian Post Office Act, 1898 - Sections 9

Reported in : 140(2007)DLT228; 2007(96)DRJ583

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,; Pallavi Bangar and; Meenakshi Chatt

Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.1. This writ petition is directed against the communication dated 08.11.2005 from the Department of Posts, Office of the Chief Postmaster General, Delhi Circle, New Delhi, whereby the petitioner was informed that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 31 1996

Vijay Kumar Gupta Vs. Kewal Krishan Kohli

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-31-1996

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : 65(1997)DLT753

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar and; P.R. Agarwal, Advs

K. Ramamoorthy, J.(1) The fact that the plaintiff is the landlord and the defendant is the tenant is not disputed. The defendant was let into the possession as a tenant on 1.12.1975, the whole of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2011

Sanjay Chandra and ors. Vs. C.B.i.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-23-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (CRPC) - Sections 439, 170, 161, 164, 88, 437, 498, 173(8); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 420, 468, 471; PC (Prevention Of Corruption) Act - Section 13(2) read with 13(1)(d); Constitution of India - Article 21

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ram Jethmalani; Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi; Mr. Pinaki Mishra; Ms. Ritu Bhalla; Mr. Sushil Bajaj; Ms. Rebecca M. John, Advs.

1. Accused Sanjay Chandra, Vinod Goenka, Gautam Doshi, Hari Nair and Surendra Pipara vide above referred applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are seeking bail in case FIR No.RC-DAI-2009-A-0045 P.S. ACB, CBI New Delhi under Section 420,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 2014

Gvr Infra Projects Limited Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-02-2014

Subject : Arbitration

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Atul Sharma, Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Mr. Sarojanand Jha, Ms. Isha J. Kumar

$~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. 1533/2014 GVR INFRA PROJECTS LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. with Mr Atul Sharma, Mr Milanka Chaudhury, Mr Sarojanand Jha...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 2001

Arun Kapur Vs. Vikram Kapur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-08-2001

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 4; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 9; Arbitration Act - Sections 5, 16 and 17; Companies Act

Reported in : AIR2002Delhi420; 95(2002)DLT42; 2002(61)DRJ495a

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv.,; Vibhu Bhakru and; Arvind Dutt,

J.D. Kapoor, J. 1. This order shall dispose of the main petition as well as the application under Order 39 Rule CPC. 2. In this petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2013

Vodafone Infrastructure Ltd. and ors. Vs. ---

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-18-2013

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Mihir Joshi, Ms. Niti Dixit, Mr. Sandeep Singhi, Ms. Raunaq B. Mathur, Ms. Samiksha Godiyal, Mr. Gopal Jain, Mr. Kunal Kaul, Mr. Rishi Agrawala, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Mr. Milanka Chaudhury, Mr. Sarojanand Jha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CO. PET. No. 14 of 2012 Reserved on: April 1, 2013 Decision on: April 18, 2013 IN THE MATTER OF: VODAFONE INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ORS. ..... Petitioners...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 2019

Gvk Airport Holdings Limited vs.bid Services Division (Mauritius) Limi ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-01-2019

Subject : Service Tax

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Kartik Nayar, Mr. Sarthak Malhotra, Mr. Rishab Kumar

+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:28. h May 2019 Pronounced on:1. t July 2019 O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 96/2019 & I.A. 4839/2019 GVK AIRPORT HOLDINGS LIMITED ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 2019

Consortium of Siemens Ltd. India, Siemens Sa Spain and Siemens Ag Germ ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-06-2019

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Mr. Susmit Pushkar, Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Ms. Bhavna Mishra, Ms. Pinky Anand, Mr. Jitender Kumar Singh, Mr. Sumit Teterwal, Ms. Saurabh Sharma, Mr. Senior, Mr. Preet Singh, Ms. Rachita Garg

$~31, 34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:06. 12.2019 + W.P.(C) 12857/2019 CONSORTIUM OF SIEMENS LTD. INDIA, SIEMENS SA SPAIN AND SIEMENS AG GERMANY & ORS.....Petitioners Through:...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial