Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajiv kumar · Page 1 of about 1,134 results (0.285 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 11 2004

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Surya Paints and Oil Works

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-11-2004

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 28(3)

Reported in : 2004(3)ARBLR64(Bom); 2004(5)BomCR631; 2004(3)MhLj391

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Kumar and ;Prakash Shinde, Advs., i/b., M. Dhruva and Co.

S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. By this petition, the petitioner-Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited (ONGC) is challenging an Award dated 4th December, 2001 whereby the learned Arbitrator has rejected the claim of the petitioner-ONGC for refund of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2007

Md. Shahzada Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : Mar-20-2007

Subject : Civil

Acts : Bihar Municipal Act, 1922 - Sections 3(29), 23 and 33; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21; Bihar and Orissa General Clauses Act, 1917 - Sections 24

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Adv.

J.N. Bhatt, C.J.1. Whether a tenderer of the resignation could be permitted to withdraw the resignation from an elective post before the acceptance of the resignation, is the sole question which is posed before us for...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 2009

Biswa Chandra Debbarma and anr. Vs. State of Tripura and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jan-21-2009

Subject : Civil

Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Heard Mr. S. Deb, learned senior Counsel appearing for the writ appellants/writ petitioners. Also heard Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned Government Advocate representing the State Authorities.2. Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 08 1993

Hari Om and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 323 and 324

Reported in : 1993CriLJ1383; 1993(1)Crimes294(SC); JT1993(2)SC657; 1993(1)SCALE32; 1993Supp(2)SCC1

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jain,; R.P. Singh,; M. K. Garg and;

1. Both the appeals and special leave petitions can be dealt with under a common judgment since the appellants/petitioners took trial before the learned VIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Moradabad with reference to the occurrence...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2009

Smt. Rajni Sharma and ors. Vs. Fateh Chand Sharma and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-17-2009

Subject : Family

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC381

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Rajiv Kumar Srivastava

S.K. Gupta, J.1. This revision is directed against the order dated 7.12.2004 and 29.1.2005, passed by Additional District Judge (Special Judge, E.C. Act) Ghaziabad in Misc. Case No. 222 of 2002, Fateh Chand Sharma and Anr....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 26 1997

Social Action for Relief To the Consumer and Anr. Vs. Ranchi Municipal ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jun-26-1997

Subject : Civil

Aftab Alam, J.1. These two writ petitions/have been heard together mainly because in both cases reliefs are claimed against a common set of respondents, Ranchi Municipal Corporation and its Adminstrator. But the issues raised in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 1996

The Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Muhammad Masud Muhammad MahsIn B ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-09-1996

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 - Sections 35 and 37; Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 - Sections 20; Bombay Land Revenue Rules, 1881 - Rule 7A, 7B and 7C; Bombay Salt Act, 1890 - Sections 3 and 17; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9, 11, 18 and 25; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 58, 100 and 110; Constitution of India - Article 294; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 99 and 100; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 2, 31 and 32;

Reported in : 1997(2)BomCR314

Advocate for Appellant : Rafique Dada, Special Counsel,; V.T. Tulpule, Government Pleader, ;K.K. Tated, Asssistant Government Pleader for appellants Nos. 1 and 2,; Rajiv Kumar, Adv., i/b., Milan Bhise Co., for appellants No.

M.L. Dudhat, J.1. This appeal and the cross appeal are filed against the judgment and decree dated 23rd June 1993 passed by the learned District Judge, Raigad, Alibag in Land Acquisition Reference No. 184 of 1986....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 2009

Anami Narayan Roy, Indian Inhabitant and ors. Vs. Suprakash Chakravart ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-05-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4A, 5, 6, 8 and 8A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 16(1), 16(2), 32, 141, 142, 144, 164(1A), 245, 246 and 311; Advocates Act, 1961; Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 - Sections 4A; Prevention of Corruption Act; Indian Police Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954; India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 - Rules 3, 3(2), 6 and 7(1); Indian Police Services (Cadre) Rules, 1954; Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Services) Rules, 1981; All India Services (Deathcum Retirement Benefits) Rules, 1958 - Rule 16 and 16(1A); Indian Police Service (Pay) Rules, 1954 - Rule 3(2A); Central Civil Services (CCA) Rules, 1965 - Rule 10 and 10(5); Indian Police Service (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955

Reported in : 2009(3)BomCR221; 2009(111)BomLR869

Advocate for Appellant : Rafique Dada, Sr. Adv. and ;Birendra Saraf, Adv., i/b., I.C. Legal, Adv. in W.P. (L) No. 2528/2008, ;R.M. Kadam, Adv. General, ;V.S. Masurkar and ;D.A. Nalawade, Government Pleaders in W.P. (L) No. 25

Swatanter Kumar, C.J.1. Rule in both the Writ Petitions. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, Rule called out and heard finally at the admission stage itself.Facts2. The State of Maharashtra vide its order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 2008

Rawatsons Engineers (P) Ltd. Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Patna

Decided on : May-14-2008

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act - Sections 2 and 7

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Kumar Verma, Sr. Adv. and Rajneesh, Adv.

Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.1. With the consent of the parties this Writ application is being disposed of at the stage of admission itself as counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the concerned Railway and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2003

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Vs. Garware Shipping Corporation ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-05-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 11 and 16; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(4)ALLMR88; 2003(3)ARBLR523(Bom); 2003(6)BomCR1; 2004(1)MhLj226

Advocate for Appellant : Rajive Kumar, Adv. and ;S.A. Bhalwal, Adv. i/b, ;Vyas Adv. and ;Bhalwal, Advs.

R.M. Lodha, J.1. On 3rd October, 1984, the petitioner-Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (for short 'O.N.G.C') entered into time five charter party agreement for supply of vessels with the first respondent (for short 'owner') initially...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial