Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajiv gupta · Page 1 of about 265 results (0.104 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 23 2001

Om Prakash Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2001

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 177 and 220; Inidan Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 215, 420, 467, 468 and 511; Constitution of India (Fifteenth Amendment - 1963, Forty Second Amendment - 1976) - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4385

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta and ;Dilip Kumar, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J1. This writ petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been preferred with unusual prayers that the proceedings in complaint cases Nos. 627 of 2000, 42 of 2001, 36 of 2001...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2004

Cit Vs. Janta Cold Storage

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-15-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]146TAXMAN402(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A.N. Mahajan for the Assessee Shashi Kant and Rajiv Gupta for the Revenue

1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court:'Whether on the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 16 2004

Smt. Darshan Devi Vs. State of Up

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-16-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2006]150TAXMAN252(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta for the Applicant. Ashok Kumar for the Opposite Party.

V.K. Chaturvedi, J. Smt. Darshan Devi and three others have preferred this revision against the judgment and order dated 24-1-1989 passed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Allahabad in Union of India v. Bound Advertising Company (Case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 01 1997

M.G.F. (India) Ltd. Vs. Satish Grover

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-01-1997

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1998IAD(Delhi)127; 69(1997)DLT649; 1998(44)DRJ203

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Mukta Kapoor, Adv.

Held:The petitioner Company, in support of its case, has adduced the evidence by means of affidavit and has filed the affidavit of Shri Rajiv Gupta, Director-in-Charge and the Constituted Attorney of the petitioner company. Said Shri...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 20 2001

Anil Kumar and Another Vs. Sri Chandra Shekhar Azad University, Kanpur ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-20-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1382

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta, Adv.

B.K. Rathi, J.1. This revision has been preferred against the order passed in Misc. Appeal No. 113 of 2000 by which the matter has beenremanded for re-decision of application 6C. The Stamp Reporter has reported that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 19 2005

Smt. Shakuntala Devi Wife of Late Jwala Prasad and ors. Vs. State of U ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-19-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Dowry Prohibition Act - Sections 3 and 4; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 323 and 498A

Reported in : I(2006)DMC268

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta and ;Dilip Kumar, Advs.

Poonam Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri Dilip Kumar and Sri Rajiv Gupta Advocates for the applicant, Sri Anoop Trivedi Advocate for opposite party No. 2 and learned A.G.A. for the State.2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 2003

East African (i) Remedies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Ltd. a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-01-2003

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi74; 105(2003)DLT293; 2003(27)PTC18(Del); 2003(3)RAJ119

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Gupta, Adv

R.C. Jain, J. 1. Plaintiff-company has filed this application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 read with Section 151 CPC seeking an ad interim injunction for restraining the defendants, their servants, reatailers, stockists, distributors, representatives...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 07 2005

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. Pramod Gupta (D) by L.Rs. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-07-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 8, 9, 9(1), 9(3), 10, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 18, 23(1), 25, 25(2), 28, 30, 30(3), 31, 34, 47A, 53 and 54; Punjab Minor Mineral Rules, 1934 - Rules 2, 3, 5 and 7; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 31, 31A and 142; Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 7, 11, 22, 23, 42 and 154; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rules 17 and 18- Order 41, Rules 3 and 27; ;Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 - Sections 7, 11, 31, 31(2), 32, 41, 42, 42(1), 42(2), 60C, 61, 154 and 185; ;Government of India Act; ;Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1948; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 617; ;Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 5 to 13, 14, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 18 and 20; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections

Reported in : AIR2005SC3708; 2005(4)CTC762; JT2005(8)SC203; (2005)12SCC1; MANU/SC/0549/2005

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Gupta

S.B. Sinha, J. 1.Leave granted in the special leave petitions.INTRODUCTION :2. These appeals are directed against a common judgment and order dated 5.10.2001 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi in R.F.A....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 21 1998

Mrs. Margarida Gomes Pereira Vs. State of Goa and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-21-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections - 4, 6, 11-A and 12(1)

Reported in : AIR1998Bom327; 1998(3)ALLMR682; 1998(3)BomCR87; (1998)2BOMLR286; 1998(2)MhLj346

Advocate for Appellant : A.P. Cardozo, Adv.

ORDERR.K. Batta, J.1. Land belonging to the petitioner was acquired by respondents Nos. 1 and 2 for respondent No. 3, as Government Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 vide section No. 4 Notification bearing No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2005

Ram Kishan S/O Sri Rati Ram and ors. Vs. Trilok Chand S/O Sri Sadhu Ra ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-23-2005

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 6, Rule 17

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1494

Advocate for Appellant : Y.K. Sinha, Adv.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Plaintiff Respondent nos. 1 to 5 filed suit No. 259 of 1995 before Civil Judge (Senior Division), Ghaziabad on 28.2.1995 praying for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the respondent No. 7,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial