Advanced Search Results

Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai Vs. Alagendran Finance Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 22, 22(2), 34, 34(1), 129, 139, 143 (3), 147, 148, 263, 263(1), 263(2) and 263(3); Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22(2); Finance Act, 1989; Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 17; Companies Act, 1956

Reported in : AIR2007SC3005; (2007)211CTR(SC)69; [2007]293ITR1(SC); JT2007(9)SC424; 2007(9)SCALE387; (2007)7SCC215

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; B.L. Chiber,; M.F. Humayunisa,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Whether for the purpose of computing the period of limitation envisaged under Sub-section (2) of Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the date of order...

J.P. Anand Vs. D.G. Baffna

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14, 14(1), 14A, 25B, 25B(4) and 25B(5)

Reported in : AIR2002SC141; 94(2002)DLT465(SC); JT2001(9)SC416; 2001(8)SCALE22; (2002)1SCC482

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; Erakshi Kulshrestha and; Rakesh K. Sh

ORDER1. This appeal by special leave is from the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi in Civil Revision No.61 of 1999 dated February 5,1999. The dispute in this appeal arises under Section 25B(5)...

Resham Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 300 and 304

Reported in : AIR2002SC2625; 2002CriLJ3506; 2001(8)SCALE231; (2002)10SCC151

Thomas, J.1. Singing of obscene ballad unfortunately became the genesis of a series of events which ultimately ended up in the murder of Malkiat Singh on the morning of 21-3-1991. A septuagenarian, Tarsem Singh, his son...

Associated Traders and ors. Vs. Collector of Customs, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Customs

Reported in : 1998VIAD(SC)42; AIR1998SC2581; 1998(60)ECC258; 1998(98)ELT296(SC); JT1998(4)SC304; (1998)3SCC215

ORDER1. The appellants in these appeals had imported 'Gum Rosin' of Indonesian origin from Singapore. M/s. Prabhat General Industries and M/s. Associated Traders had each imported 90 m.t., while M/s. Sarvodaya Rosin Works had imported 54...

Union of India (UOi) and Anr. Vs. Central Electrical and Mechanical En ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment (Department of Urban Development) Central Engineering (Civil) Group A Service Rules, 1996 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Articles 162 and 309

Reported in : AIR2008SC3; 2007(13)SCALE23; (2008)1SCC354; 2007AIRSCW6986.

Advocate for Appellant : R. Mohan, ASG,; Sunil Roy and; V.K. Verma, Advs

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against a judgment and order dated 24.5.2006 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CM Nos. 9506/2004 & 4393/2006...

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Devendra Nath Rai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 153; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302 and 307; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 235(2) and 354(3); ;Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21

Reported in : 101(2006)CLT702(SC); 2006CriLJ967; 2006(1)JKJ1[SC]; JT2006(1)SC370; 2006(1)SCALE304; (2006)2SCC243

Advocate for Appellant : Ranjiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; Ravi P. Mehrotra,; Garvesh Kabra

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. The Union of India, Chief of Army Staff (Army Headquarters), General Officer Commanding, commanding officer, 502, Area Defence Group and the Commanding Officer, 1, Corps, Artillery Brigade are in appeal against the judgment...

Noble Synthetics Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise, Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985; Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 56, 56(2), 56(4), 173B(4) and 173Q(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 11A

Reported in : AIR2005SC4053; 2005(2)CTC458; 2005(99)ECC353; 2005(182)ELT27(SC); JT2005(3)SC435; (2005)3SCC674

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; Nimish Kothare,; Uday Kumar,;

AR. Lakshmanan, J.1. The above appeal was filed against the final order No. 821/99-C dated 17.08.1999 passed by the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter called 'the Tribunal') in Appeal No. E/4487/93-C.2....

Post Master General, Kolkata and ors. Vs. Tutu Das (Dutta)

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 25F; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 21, 77, 162 and 309

Reported in : [2007(4)JCR101(SC)]; JT2007(6)SC340; (2007)IIILLJ163SC; (2007)6MLJ322(SC); 2007(6)SCALE453; (2007)5SCC317; 2008(3)SLJ118(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Mohan, ASG,; Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; M.F. Humayunisa,;

S.B. Sinha, J.1. Leave granted.2. Respondent had been working as a substitute to a regular EDA as and when he would remain on leave. She allegedly had completed a period of 240 days in one year...

MaIn Pal and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 302; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25 and 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC2158; 2004CriLJ2036; JT2004(4)SC273; 2004(4)SCALE178; (2004)10SCC692

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv.,; Mohar Singh,; Beno Bencigar,;

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. These appeals relate to a common judgment of Punjab and Haryana High Court and, therefore, are taken up together for disposal. The appellants who faced trial for alleged commission of offences punishable under...

Sree Kumar R. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 3(1) and 15(1); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 226 and 311

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)690; 97(2002)DLT347; [2003(97)FLR709]; 2003(1)SLJ200(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Adv. and; Sachin Das, Adv

Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. Rule.2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties the matter is taken up for final disposal. 3. The petitioner are officers and employees working in different capacities at different...