Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajinder sachher · Page 1 of about 11 results (0.024 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 12 1997

Jagdish Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-12-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 302

Reported in : AIR1998SC732; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)180; 1998(1)ALT(Cri)145; 1998CriLJ1099; 1998(1)Crimes6(SC); JT1997(10)SC28; 1997(7)SCALE625

G.N.Ray, J.1. The convictions of the appellant under Section 302 IPC and for offence punishable under Section 5 of the Terrorists and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as TADA) and consequential sentence of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 1995

Mahadeo Savlaram Shelke and ors. Vs. Puna Municipal Corporation and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-24-1995

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 115, 115(1) and 115(2) - Order 39, Rule 1; Land Acquisition Act; Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : (1995)97BOMLR273; JT1995(2)SC504; 1995(1)SCALE829; (1995)3SCC33; [1995]1SCR543

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar,;V.N. Ganpule; S.K. Agnihotri and; Punam,

ORDER1. This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Single Judge of the High Court of Bombay in Special Civil Application No. 2521 of 1978, dated December 20, 1978 wherein the learned Single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1990

Panjak Bhargava and Another Vs. Mohinder Nath and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-11-1990

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 21 and 39

Reported in : AIR1991SC1233; JT1990(4)SC628; 1990(2)SCALE1251; (1991)1SCC556; [1990]Supp3SCR508a

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher and; K.C. Dua, Advs

ORDERM.N. Venkatachaliah, J. 1. The appellant-landlords seek special leave to appeal to this Court from the Judgment dated 29.11.1989 of the High Court of Delhi in SAO No. 384 of 1987 allowing Respondent-tenants' appeal and setting-aside...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 07 1993

Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, Chandigarh Through Its ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-07-1993

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 201, 302 and 364

Reported in : AIR1994SC1023; 1994CriLJ1368; JT1993(6)SC650; 1993(4)SCALE636; (1994)1SCC616; [1993]Supp3SCR915; 1994(1)LC199(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher and; Ravindra Bana, Advs

1. Special leave granted.2. This appeal is a sequel to an unfortunate occurrence dated January 25, 1993 wherein Kulwant Singh, Advocate, practicing at the District Courts, Ropar, his wife and a child aged about two years...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 26 1991

Surayya Begum (Mst) Vs. Mohd. Usman and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-26-1991

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 11 - Order 1, Rule 8

Reported in : JT1991(2)SC435; 1991(1)SCALE810; (1991)3SCC114; [1991]2SCR517; 1991(2)LC241(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher, Sr. Adv.,; Rajinder Mathur and; Narain,

Lalit Mohan Sharma, J.1. Special leave is allowed in both the cases. Since they involve decision of some common questions of law they are being disposed of together by this judgment.2. The appellant Surayya Begum in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 26 1999

Jeet Mohinder Singh Vs. Harminder Singh Jassi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-26-1999

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 33(5), 77, 83, 100(1), 100(2), 116A and 123(1)(3)(3A)(6); Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rules 86, 90 and 94A

Reported in : AIR2000SC256; JT1999(8)SC432; 1999(6)SCALE703; (1999)9SCC386; [1999]Supp4SCR33

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher,; M.J.S. Sethi,; S.K. Mehta,;

R.C. Lahoti, J. 1. This is an appeal under Section 116A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 preferred by the appellant (petitioner before the High Court) feeling aggrieved by the judgment of the learned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 1989

Bareilly Development Authority and anr. Vs. Ajay Pal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-17-1989

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1989SC1076; JT1989(1)SC368; 1989(1)SCALE439; (1989)2SCC116; [1989]1SCR743; 1989(1)LC523(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher, Sr. Adv. and; Bharat Sanghal, Adv

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.1. These five appeals by Special Leave under Article 136 of the Constitution of India are preferred against the Judgment and Order dated 6-2-86 passed by the Allahabad High Court in Civil Misc....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1990

Union of India and Others Vs. Mohd. Ramzan Khan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-20-1990

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 311; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240

Reported in : AIR1991SC471; [1991(61)FLR736]; JT1990(4)SC456; (1991)ILLJ29SC; 1990(2)SCALE1094; (1991)1SCC588; [1990]Supp3SCR248; 1991(1)SLJ196(SC); 1991(1)LC163(SC); (1991)1UPLBEC456

Advocate for Appellant : V.C. Mahajan,; Rajinder Sachher,; Harbans Lal,;

ORDERRanganath Misra, C.J.1. Special leave granted in Special Leave Petitions. All the Civil Appeals by special leave are heard together.2. The short point that falls for determination in this bunch of appeals is as to whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 28 1994

Jugraj Singh and Another Vs. Labh Singh and Others Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-28-1994

Subject : Contract

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 16(3)

Reported in : AIR1995SC945a; 1995(3)ALT42(SC); (1995)111PLR706; 1994(5)SCALE286; [1994]Supp6SCR168; 1995(1)LC221(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachher,; Rani Chhabra and; Bharathi Sharma, Advs

ORDER1. The petitioners are defendants 2 and 3. The first defendant-Jasbir Singh had executed an agreement of sale dated 30.8.1984 in favour of the plaintiffs Labh Singh and his brother Surinder Singh. The petitioners had an...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Ajeet Singh Singhvi Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954 - Rules 28B(7), 28B(8) and 32; Rajasthan Administrative Service (Amendment) Rules, 1987

Reported in : [1991(62)FLR738]; JT1991(1)SC668; (1991)IILLJ336SC; 1991(1)SCALE250; 1991Supp(1)SCC343; [1991]1SCR579; 1991(2)LC69(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Party in Person,; Rajinder Sachher and; Ravinder Bana, Advs

Madan Mohan Punchhi, J.1. The identification of the highest post/posts in the Rajasthan Administrative Service, capable of being filled by merit alone, under Sub-rule (7) of Rule 28-B of the Rajasthan Administrative Service Rules, 1954 (hereafter...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial