Advanced Search Results

Ramesh Kapur Vs. Punjab University and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311

Reported in : AIR1965P& H120

Grover, J. (1) The Bench hearing the appear under clause 10 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dismissing a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of Ramesh Kapur (hereinafter...

Vinod Kumar Mahajan and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Conduct of State Board Examination for Diploma in Production Engineering (Punjab) Rules - Rule 16

Reported in : AIR1966P& H155

Advocate for Appellant : R. Sachar and; R.K. Chhibbar, Advs.

ORDERR.S. Narula, J.1. This judgment will dispose of four writ petitions, that is, Civil Writ No. 2710 of 1964 (Vinod Kumar Mahajan v. The State of Punjab and Ors.), Civil Writ No. 2760 of 1964 (Sushil...

Kuldeep Singh Vs. Ganpat Lal and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 7, Rule 11; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2); Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13(1) and 19A(3)

Reported in : AIR1996SC729; JT1995(9)SC157; 1995(6)SCALE683; (1996)1SCC243; [1995]Supp5SCR655; 1996(1)LC151(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar,; D.S. Chauhan,; R. Vasudevan and;

ORDERS.C. Agrawal, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal by the tenant arises out of a suit for eviction filed by the respondents under the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter...

Nagpur Improvement Trust Vs. Vasantrao and ors. and Jaswantibai and or ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyConstitution

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 6, 6(1), 11, 15, 16, 17, 17A, 18, 19, 20, 23, 23(1), 23(2), 23(3), 24, 24A, 26, 28, 28(2), 31, 31(3), 32(1), 32(4), 34, 36, 38, 40, 41, 42, 42(1), 45, 48A, 49, 54, 56, 58 and 59 to 68; The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 - Sections 32(3), 36, 36(2) and 59; Nagpur Improvement Trust Act, 1936 - Sections 26, 32(4), 36 to 47 and 59; Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam, 1965 - Sections 28(1), 32(1), 38, 39 and 55; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 23(1A), 28 and 30(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908; Constitution of India - Article 14; General Clauses Act; Calcutta Improvement Act, 1911; Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 - Sections 53; Land Acquisition (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1967 - Sections 6; Uttar

Reported in : AIR2002SC3499; 2002(6)ALD12(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)905; 2003(1)AWC161(SC); JT2002(7)SC447; (2003)1MLJ22(SC); 2002(7)SCALE307; (2002)7SCC657; [2002]SUPP2SCR636

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Dwivedi,; V.A. Mohta,; Rajinder Sachar,;

B.P. Singh, J.1. In this batch of appeals and special leave petitions thecommon question which arises for consideration is whether theprovisions of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, particularly Sections6, 23(2) and 28 thereof stand incorporated in...

M/S. Harbans Singh Tuli and Sons Builders Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8, 20 and 30; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 12 and 21

Reported in : AIR1992SC1124; 1992(2)ARBLR93(SC); I(1993)BC158(SC); JT1992(1)SC517; 1992(1)SCALE307; (1992)2SCC225; [1992]1SCR602; 1992(2)LC538(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar,; E.C. Agrawala,; Purnima Bhat Kak,;

ORDER1. The facts relating to the case are as follows:-The petitioner herein offered his tender for entering into a contract for provision of officer's mess and single officer's quarters. On 13-3-1970, the tender was accepted and...

People's Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL) and Ors. Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 19(2), 21, 32, 145(3), 171, 171(3), 173, 324, 326, 329 and 371D; Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 2(1), 4, 4A, 8, 8B, 36(2), 75A, 77, 77(1), 123(5) and 124(5); Representation of the People (3rd Amendment) Act, 2002 - Sections 8(1), 8(2), 8(3), 33(1), 33A and 33B; Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporation (Gujarat Amendment and Validating Provisions) Ordinance, 1969; The Ethics Reforms Act, 1989; Evidence Act - Sections 123; Karnataka Cauvery Basin Irrigation Protection Ordinance, 1991; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5(2) and 6; West Bengal Criminal Law Amendment (Special Courts) Act, 1949; Representation of the People Rules - Rule 90; Ne

Reported in : AIR2003SC2363; JT2003(2)SC528; 2003(3)SCALE263; (2003)4SCC399; [2003]2SCR1136

Advocate for Appellant : K.N. Rawal, Additional Solicitor General,; Rajinder Sachar,; P

Shah, J.1. These writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution of India have been filed challenging the validity of the Representation of the People (Amendment) Ordinance, 2002 (No. 4 of 2002) ('Ordinance' for short) promulgated...

Anukul Chandra Pradhan, Advocate, Supreme Court Vs. Union of India and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 62(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 32 and 326; Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 16

Reported in : AIR1997SC2814; 1997(1)ALD(Cri)139; JT1997(6)SC86; 1997(4)SCALE455; (1997)6SCC1; [1997]Supp1SCR641

Advocate for Appellant : In Petition Rajinder Sachar, Sr. Adv

ORDERJ.S. Verma, CJI.1. By this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenge is made to the constitutional validity of sub-section (5) of Section 62 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Section 62 relates...

Mohd. Swaleh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Administrative Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1987 - Rule 28(3); Delegation of Financial Powers Rules, 1978 - Rule 13; Central Administrative Tribunal (Group A post) Recruitment Rules, 1988

Reported in : JT1997(10)SC749; 1997(4)SCALE244; (1997)6SCC200; [1997]Supp1SCR298; 1997(2)LC319(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar,; Sushil Kumar Jain and; A.P. Dhamija, Advs

M. Jagannadha Rao, J. 1. The appellant has filed this appeal against the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur dated 4.5.1995 dismissing O.A. No. 342 of 1994, rejecting the appellant's claim for additional...

Balwant Rai Kumar Vs. Smt. Amrit Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rule 66(2)

Reported in : AIR1961P& H495

Advocate for Appellant : Rajinder Sachar, Adv. for Bhagirath Das, Adv.

D.K. Mahajan, J.1. In execution of a decree obtain-ed by Amrit Kaur against Balwant Rai Kumar, land belonging to Balwant Rai Kumar was sold by auction. The land was purchased by the decree-holder on the 14th...

People's Union of Civil Liberties (PUCL) Vs. Union of India (UOi) and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionMiscellaneous

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12, 19(1), 21, 32 and 51; Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 5(2) and 7; Madhya Pradesh Police Regulations - Regulations 236, 855 and 856; International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966; Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948

Reported in : AIR1997SC568; JT1997(1)SC288; 1996(9)SCALE318; (1997)1SCC301; [1996]Supp10SCR321; 1997(1)LC187(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Kapil Sibal,; Rajinder Sachar,; Rashmi Kapadi and;

ORDERKuldip Singh, J.1. Telephone-Tapping is a serious invasion of an individual's privacy. With the growth of highly sophisticated communication technology, the right to hold telephone conversation, in the privacy of one's home or office without interference,...