Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajesh kumar · Page 1 of about 6,158 results (0.308 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 24 2002

Laxmi Shanker Pathak and anr. Vs. District Inspector of Schools and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 33A(1); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulations 3(1) and 6

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2699; (2002)2UPLBEC1883

Advocate for Appellant : D.S.M. Tripathi and ;Rajesh Kumar, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. All these connected writ petitions raise dispute relating to seniority of petitioners Laxmi Shanker Pathak, Fateh Chandra Lal, Lalloo Chauhan, Rama Shanker Pandey, and Krishna Narain Singh in Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Durgaganj, Varanasi....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2002

Subash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Rules, 1961 - Rules 10(2), 52 to 68, 86 and 86(1)

Reported in : [2002]255ITR289(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. By this writ petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the order dated November 22, 1999 (annexure 16), passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2002

Subash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]122TAXMAN95(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, for the Petitioner

ORDERBy this writ petition the prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 22-11-1999 (Annexure-16) passed by the Commissioner (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed under rule 86(1) of the Second Schedule to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 2000

Prayag Udyog (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-07-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]245ITR288(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, for the Assessee Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue

By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenges an order dated 29-7-1999, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Allahabad,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1998

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Murli Manohar Deceased Through Lr

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)148CTR(All)116

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, for the Revenue P. N. Batham, for the Assessee

By the CourtIn compliance with this courts direction under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal, Delhi Bench A, has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether, on...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1999

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kesho Ram and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-14-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]245ITR733(All)

Advocate for Appellant : A. N. Mahajan, for the Commissioner Rajesh Kumar, for the assessee

M. C. Agarwal, J.By this application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner Meerut, prays that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, be directed to draw up a statement of the case...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 05 1999

Shanker Traders Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-05-1999

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]248ITR691(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar for the Assessee A.N. Mahajan for the Revenue

These three applications under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, have been preferred by an assessee praying that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, be directed to state respective cases and refer the following...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1998

Commissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Chhail Behari Lal

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1998)148CTR(All)299

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, for the Revenue None, for the Assessee

By the CourtAt the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Agra, the Tribunal (Delhi `D' Bench, Delhi), has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2005

Rajesh Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

Decided on : Aug-02-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 10 and 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 302, 364, 365 and 387

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Kumar Sinha No. 1, Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Dinesh Prasad Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Griyaghey, Sudhanshu Kumar, N.K. Agrawal, Tej Narayan Singh, Satyendra Prasad Singh, Mahesh Prasad, Samir Kumar Bharti an

Manohar Lal Visa, J.1. As all these three appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 28-2-1987 passed by Additional Sessions Judge II Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 393 of 1994/24 of 1994 convicting and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 17 2009

Bhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-17-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 4, 6, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 17G and 44; Security Guards Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 145 and 149; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam - Sections 50(1); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 254 and 254(2)

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : Jamshed P. Cama (NP),; Chander Uday Singh (NP),; K.K. Singhv

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of SLP (Civil) No. 1982 of 2007, SLP (Civil) No. 3624 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4065 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4046 of 2007, SLP (Civil)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial