Advanced Search Results
Laxmi Shanker Pathak and anr. Vs. District Inspector of Schools and or ...
Allahabad
May-24-2002
Service
Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 33A(1); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulations 3(1) and 6
2002(4)AWC2699; (2002)2UPLBEC1883
D.S.M. Tripathi and ;Rajesh Kumar, Advs.
Sunil Ambwani, J.1. All these connected writ petitions raise dispute relating to seniority of petitioners Laxmi Shanker Pathak, Fateh Chandra Lal, Lalloo Chauhan, Rama Shanker Pandey, and Krishna Narain Singh in Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Durgaganj, Varanasi....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-26-2002
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Rules, 1961 - Rules 10(2), 52 to 68, 86 and 86(1)
[2002]255ITR289(All)
Rajesh Kumar, Adv.
R.B. Misra, J.1. By this writ petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the order dated November 22, 1999 (annexure 16), passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSubash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer
Allahabad
Feb-26-2002
Direct Taxation
[2002]122TAXMAN95(All)
Rajesh Kumar, for the Petitioner
ORDERBy this writ petition the prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 22-11-1999 (Annexure-16) passed by the Commissioner (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed under rule 86(1) of the Second Schedule to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Prayag Udyog (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and anr.
Allahabad
Feb-07-2000
Direct Taxation
[2001]245ITR288(All)
Rajesh Kumar, for the Assessee Ashok Kumar, for the Revenue
By this petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenges an order dated 29-7-1999, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'A' Bench, Allahabad,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Murli Manohar Deceased Through Lr
Allahabad
Jan-20-1998
Direct Taxation
(1998)148CTR(All)116
Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, for the Revenue P. N. Batham, for the Assessee
By the CourtIn compliance with this courts direction under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal, Delhi Bench A, has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court :'1. Whether, on...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kesho Ram and ors.
Allahabad
Dec-14-1999
Direct Taxation
[2001]245ITR733(All)
A. N. Mahajan, for the Commissioner Rajesh Kumar, for the assessee
M. C. Agarwal, J.By this application under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner Meerut, prays that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, be directed to draw up a statement of the case...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShanker Traders Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax
Allahabad
Nov-05-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]248ITR691(All)
Rajesh Kumar for the Assessee A.N. Mahajan for the Revenue
These three applications under section 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, have been preferred by an assessee praying that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad, be directed to state respective cases and refer the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Wealth Tax Vs. Chhail Behari Lal
Allahabad
Jan-20-1998
Direct Taxation
(1998)148CTR(All)299
Rajesh Kumar Agarwal, for the Revenue None, for the Assessee
By the CourtAt the instance of the Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Agra, the Tribunal (Delhi `D' Bench, Delhi), has referred the following questions for the opinion of this court under section 27(1) of the Wealth Tax...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajesh Kumar Singh and anr. Vs. State of Bihar
Patna
Aug-02-2005
Criminal
Evidence Act - Sections 10 and 13; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 154 and 164; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120B, 201, 302, 364, 365 and 387
Alok Kumar Sinha No. 1, Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Dinesh Prasad Sharma, Sanjay Kumar Griyaghey, Sudhanshu Kumar, N.K. Agrawal, Tej Narayan Singh, Satyendra Prasad Singh, Mahesh Prasad, Samir Kumar Bharti an
Manohar Lal Visa, J.1. As all these three appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 28-2-1987 passed by Additional Sessions Judge II Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 393 of 1994/24 of 1994 convicting and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhuwalka Steel Indus. Ltd. Vs. Bombay Iron and Steel Labour Bd. and an ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-17-2009
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 - Sections 1, 2, 2(2), 2(11), 2(12), 4, 6, 14, 15, 15(2), 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13), 3(14), 17G and 44; Security Guards Act; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 147, 145 and 149; Central Sales Tax Act - Sections 8(3); Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Madhya Pradesh Nagar Tatha Gram Nivesh Adhiniyam - Sections 50(1); Constitution of India - Articles 141, 254 and 254(2)
2010(1)BomCR656; JT2009(15)SC269; (2010)ILLJ561SC; 2009(14)SCALE623; (2010)2SCC273; 2009(10)LC5041(SC)
Jamshed P. Cama (NP),; Chander Uday Singh (NP),; K.K. Singhv
V.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. This judgment will dispose of SLP (Civil) No. 1982 of 2007, SLP (Civil) No. 3624 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4065 of 2007, SLP (Civil).... CC No. 4046 of 2007, SLP (Civil)...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »