Advanced Search Results

Rajendra Prasad Vs. Babulal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 2000(3)WLC652; 2001(1)WLN668

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Rajesh Kapoor

Arun Madan, J.1. This civil revision petition arises out of order dated 30.9.1999 of the Additional District Judge No. 2, Ajmer in Civil Suit No. 1/56, whereby the respondent No. 3's application under Order 32 Rule...

Prem Chand Vs. Rajendra Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 21(2)

Reported in : 2002(2)WLC320

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kapoor, Adv.

Madan, J. 1. By this revision petition an order dt. 28.8.2000 of the Civil Judge (JD) Ajmer East whereby review petition under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC was partly allowed for adding word 'till realization' in...

Rajesh Kapoor Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board and Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision : July 20, 2015 + LPA4632015 RAJESH KAPOOR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Sagar Saxena, Ms.Jyoti K.Chaudhary, Mr.Suraj Prakash, Advs. versus PUBLIC ENTERPRISES...

Rajesh Kapoor Vs. Public Enterprises Selection Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. J. R. Chaudhary, Mr. Sagar Saxena, Mr. Suraj Prakash, Ms. Swati

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: July 16, 2015 + W.P.(C) 6759/2015 RAJESH KAPOOR Through: ..... Petitioner Mr. J.R. Chaudhary, Adv. with Mr. Sagar Saxena, Adv. & Mr. Suraj...

Kamla and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 498A, 406; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 482; Constitution of India - Article 141

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Suresh Sahni, Adv.

1. Aggrieved by the alleged unfair investigation being conducted by the police in the FIR, FIR No.147/2010, registered at Mahila Thana (North), Jaipur for offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC, the petitioners have approached this...

Jagtar Singh and ors. Vs. Amar Singh and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Contract

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 23, Rule 3 and Order 41, Rule 27; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : (2006)143PLR78

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Kang, Adv.

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. This second appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 22.1.1985 passed by the Additional District Judge, Kapurthala whereby appeal preferred by the appellant-plaintiffs against he judgement and decree dated 29.11.1983...

State of Rajasthan Vs. Harish Chandra

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1995(1)WLC425; 1994(2)WLN444

Rajendra Saxena, J.1. These revision petitions are being disposed-off by a common order because a common point of law is involved therein.2. These revision petitions have been preferred against the orders dated 3.7.92 and 29.7.92 passed...

Dr. Rajesh Kapoor vs.delhi Cantonment Board and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Vikas Dhawan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: July 01, 2019 + W.P.(C) 3989/2018 & CM. No 15715/2018 DR. RAJESH KAPOOR Through: Mr. Vikas Dhawan and Ms. Kreeti Joshi, Advs. ........ Petitioner...

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Kapurthala Vs. Vijay Kapur and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166

Reported in : 2003ACJ1730

Advocate for Appellant : Alok Jain, Adv.

Bakhshish Kaur, J.1. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'the Insurance Co.) against whom an award under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act was passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Panipat...

Raees Ahmed Vs. Shrigopal Prakash and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 100 - Order 3, Rule 1

Reported in : 2002(50)BLJR2508

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kapur, Adv.

Madan, J.1. The appellant (defendant) has challenged the judgment & decree dated 21.8.99 of the ADJ No. 2, Ajmer who allowed respondent's civil appeal No. 1/98 by setting aside trial Court's judgment dated 15.1.96 in civil...