Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Surya Pandit, I.A.S. (Retd.) Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (1995)111PLR682

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J. 1. Even after the death of her husband, who died in 1994 after being operated for bypass heart surgery and Miteral valve replacement, the petitioner has not been able to live in peace...

Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-i Vs. Doaba Steel Rolling Mills Overruled

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Hot Re-rolling Steel Mills Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 - Rule 5; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC673; 2002(139)ELT285(P&H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, ACGSC

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The Commissioner of Central Excise has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It is claimed that the following two questions of law arise out of the...

Commr. of C. Ex., Chandigarh-ii Vs. Jagdambay Engg. and Welding Works

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57A; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H(1)

Reported in : 2002(143)ELT496(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, ACGSC

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J. 1. The first respondent is engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicle parts. It claimed Modvat credit in respect of various items including grinding wheels. The Assessee's claim was rejected by the...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Kumar Engg. Corpn. and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC51

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Gumber

Jawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The Revenue has filed this petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It stated that the following question arises for the opinion of this Court:Whether gate passes issued prior...

Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh-ii Vs. Deesh Plastic Industries

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC675; 2002(139)ELT263(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, ACGSC

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The respondent was registered for the manufacture of polythene bags. It claimed Modvat credit of Rs. 68,527/- for the quarter ending September, 1996 and of Rs. 49,561/- for the subsequent quarter ending...

Commissioner of C. Ex., Chandigarh Vs. J.R. Engg. Works

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rule 57G; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35H

Reported in : 2002(79)ECC423; 2002(140)ELT79(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gumber, Adv.

ORDERAshutosh Mohunta, J.1. The Revenue has filed the present reference petition under Section 35H(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order Annexure P3 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New...

Pml Industries Ltd., Derabassi Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 110 and 111

Reported in : 2000(69)ECC72; 2000LC201(P& H); 2000(120)ELT305(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.L. Sarin, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Mahavir Ahlawat and; M

ORDERMr. N.K. Sud, J. 1. The petitioner - M/s. PML Industries Ltd. is a public limited company and is engaged in the business of manufacture of boneless buffalo meat at village Behra, Derabassi, Punjab. It imported/procured...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Harcharan and Bros.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2002(82)ECC49; 2002(149)ELT73(P& H)

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. The first respondent is engaged in the manufacture of CI pipes. It claimed modvat credit in respect of various items including grinding wheels. The Assessee's claim was rejected by the Dy. Commissioner....

Whirlpool of India Limited Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC29; 2000LC33(P& H); 2001(137)ELT42(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. M.L. Sareen

ORDERJawahar Lal Gupta, J.1. Is the action of the authorities in requiring the petitioner to declare the 'Maximum Retail Price' on the cartons containing Refrigerators, arbitrary and illegal? This is the short question that arises in...

Vardhman Polytex Limited and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 2001(78)ECC53

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. These petitions are directed against circular dated 19.10.2000 issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, New Delhi (for short, 'the Board') clarifying that Additional Excise Duty (for short 'AED') under the...