Advanced Search Results
Bimla Rani Ahluwalia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-21-1998
Civil
Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973 - Rule 20
(1998)120PLR38
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. The only point involved in this case is whether the revisional authority could, while exercising the powers under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulations) Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1952...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUttam Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-19-1997
ConstitutionCivil
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11(2) and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 166(2), 166(3) and 226
(1998)118PLR67
R.L. Sharma and; Rajesh Garg, Advs.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The only and the all important question which requires adjudication in these appeals is whether an agreement arrived at between a group of persons and the Chief Minister of a State can be...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKasturi Lal (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Vs. Sadhu Ram and anr.
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-25-2004
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13
(2005)139PLR216
H.S. Giani, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed by the landlord-petitioner under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity 'the Act') challenges judgment dated 26.9.1992 passed by the Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur whereby...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Smt. Parkash Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Apr-21-2006
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17, 17(1), 17(4) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 136
AIR2006P& H219; (2006)143PLR577
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
Ranjit Singh, J.1. Aggrieved against the notification issued by the Government of Punjab dated 06/08/2004 seeking to acquire the land in villages of Tehsil Dasua and Mukerian of District Hoshiarpur for the purpose of doubling the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSham Lal Gupta Vs. Hemco Industries (P) Limited
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-16-2005
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 24, 62 and 70
I(2006)BC384; [2008]143CompCas319(P& H); (2005)141PLR635
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
N.K. Sud, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Company Judge dated 17.5.1994 whereby the petition of the appellant under Sections 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSachdeva Rice Mills and ors. Vs. Smt. Raj Anand and ors.
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-05-2002
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110, 110A and 110CC
I(2003)ACC53; 2003ACJ1482; (2003)133PLR23
Vibhav Jain, Adv. for Claimants and; Rajesh Garg, Adv. for Cross-objector;
M.M. Kumar, J.1. By this order, we are disposing of Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 33 to 36 of 1987, Letters Patent Appeal Nos.837 and 838 of 1986 alongwith Cross Objection No. 3 in Letters Patent Appeal...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBhakra Beas Management Board Vs. State of Haryana
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-24-2005
Sales Tax
Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 15, 16, 16A, 17 and 18; Excise Tax Act; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963
[2006]147STC336(P& H)
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana (for short, 'the Tribunal') has referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this Court :(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFood Corporation of India Vs. Dhani Ram
Punjab and Haryana
May-05-2004
Civil
Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1
I(2005)BC118; (2004)138PLR248
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
H.S. Bedi, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the District Judge, Hisar, dated 31.10.1983 whereby lie dismissed the appeal filed by the Food Corporation of India against the order dated 15.10.1982 of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFood Corporation of India Vs. Mahalakshmi Rice and General Mills
Punjab and Haryana
Jul-21-2004
Commercial
III(2005)BC334; (2005)139PLR338
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
Viney Mittal, J.1. The defendant has approached this Court through the present regular second appeal.2. A suit for recovery of Rs. 22,000/- was filed by plaintiff-respondent M/s Mahalak-shmi Rice and General Mills. It was claimed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShiv Kumar JaIn Vs. Daya Ram
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-02-2004
Tenancy
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3) and 15(5)
(2005)139PLR614
Rajesh Garg, Adv.
M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the courts below holding that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »