Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajesh garg · Page 1 of about 125 results (0.084 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 21 1998

Bimla Rani Ahluwalia Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-21-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Building Rules, 1973 - Rule 20

Reported in : (1998)120PLR38

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

ORDERG.S. Singhvi, J.1. The only point involved in this case is whether the revisional authority could, while exercising the powers under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulations) Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1952...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 19 1997

Uttam Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-19-1997

Subject : ConstitutionCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11(2) and 23; Constitution of India - Articles 166(2), 166(3) and 226

Reported in : (1998)118PLR67

Advocate for Appellant : R.L. Sharma and; Rajesh Garg, Advs.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The only and the all important question which requires adjudication in these appeals is whether an agreement arrived at between a group of persons and the Chief Minister of a State can be...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 25 2004

Kasturi Lal (Deceased) Through L.Rs. Vs. Sadhu Ram and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-25-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13

Reported in : (2005)139PLR216

Advocate for Appellant : H.S. Giani, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This petition filed by the landlord-petitioner under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity 'the Act') challenges judgment dated 26.9.1992 passed by the Appellate Authority, Gurdaspur whereby...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Apr 21 2006

Smt. Parkash Kaur Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-21-2006

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 17, 17(1), 17(4) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 136

Reported in : AIR2006P& H219; (2006)143PLR577

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

Ranjit Singh, J.1. Aggrieved against the notification issued by the Government of Punjab dated 06/08/2004 seeking to acquire the land in villages of Tehsil Dasua and Mukerian of District Hoshiarpur for the purpose of doubling the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2005

Sham Lal Gupta Vs. Hemco Industries (P) Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-16-2005

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439; Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Articles 24, 62 and 70

Reported in : I(2006)BC384; [2008]143CompCas319(P& H); (2005)141PLR635

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

N.K. Sud, J.1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of the learned Company Judge dated 17.5.1994 whereby the petition of the appellant under Sections 433(e), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 05 2002

Sachdeva Rice Mills and ors. Vs. Smt. Raj Anand and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Aug-05-2002

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 110, 110A and 110CC

Reported in : I(2003)ACC53; 2003ACJ1482; (2003)133PLR23

Advocate for Appellant : Vibhav Jain, Adv. for Claimants and; Rajesh Garg, Adv. for Cross-objector;

M.M. Kumar, J.1. By this order, we are disposing of Letters Patent Appeal Nos. 33 to 36 of 1987, Letters Patent Appeal Nos.837 and 838 of 1986 alongwith Cross Objection No. 3 in Letters Patent Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 24 2005

Bhakra Beas Management Board Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jan-24-2005

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Haryana General Sales Tax Act, 1973 - Sections 15, 16, 16A, 17 and 18; Excise Tax Act; Central Provinces and Berar Sales Tax Act, 1947; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2; Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963

Reported in : [2006]147STC336(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Haryana (for short, 'the Tribunal') has referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this Court :(1) Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 05 2004

Food Corporation of India Vs. Dhani Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-05-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 29, Rule 1

Reported in : I(2005)BC118; (2004)138PLR248

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

H.S. Bedi, J.1. This petition is directed against the order of the District Judge, Hisar, dated 31.10.1983 whereby lie dismissed the appeal filed by the Food Corporation of India against the order dated 15.10.1982 of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 2004

Food Corporation of India Vs. Mahalakshmi Rice and General Mills

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-21-2004

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : III(2005)BC334; (2005)139PLR338

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

Viney Mittal, J.1. The defendant has approached this Court through the present regular second appeal.2. A suit for recovery of Rs. 22,000/- was filed by plaintiff-respondent M/s Mahalak-shmi Rice and General Mills. It was claimed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 2004

Shiv Kumar JaIn Vs. Daya Ram

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-02-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13(3) and 15(5)

Reported in : (2005)139PLR614

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Garg, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This is tenant's petition filed under Section 15(5) of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 (for brevity, Act) challenging concurrent findings of facts recorded by both the courts below holding that...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial