Advanced Search Results
Mico Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Apr-04-2002
Excise
(2002)(82)ECC97
Shri. Rajesh Chandra Kumar
1. Shri Rajesh Chandra Kumar appearing for the appellants submitted that he was instructed by the appellants to challenge only the question of time bar issue. In this context he referred to the reply given by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWorld Wide Traders Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board, Mi ...
Karnataka
Jun-18-1999
FERA
1999(66)ECC517
Sri. Rajesh Chandra Kumar
ORDERM.P. Chinnappa, J.1. The brief facts leading to this appeal and which are not in dispute are, that the appellant is a registered firm carrying on business in export of readymade garments to various countries out...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Limited Represented by Its Legal Manager Shri Vishal Mittal and ...
Karnataka
Aug-21-2009
Commercial
Standard of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 - Sections 39, 39(1), 39(4), 63, 83 and 83(2); Standard of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) (Amendment) Rules, 2006 - Rules 8 and 18; Standard of Weight and Measures (Packed Commodities) Rules, 1977 - Rules 2, 6, 11, 11(4) and 26; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1) and 21
Rajesh Chandra Kumar, Adv.
ORDERAjit J. Gunjal, J.1. The petitioners in tins petition are seeking for declaration that Rule 8(b) and 18 of the Standard of Weights and Measures (Packaged Commodities) Amendment Rules 2006 is ultra vires of Articles 14,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Mangalore Refinery and Petrol Vs. C.C.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Jan-29-2003
Land Acquisition
Shri. Rajesh Chandra Kumar
1. There are 12 appeals filed by the Appellants M/s. MRPL against a common impugned order involving a common issue. Hence all these appeals are taken together for hearing and are being disposed of by this...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S. Worldwide Traders, Bangalore Vs. Foreign Exchange Regulation Appe ...
Karnataka
Jun-18-1999
FERA
Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - Sections 18(2), 52 and 54
[2001]104CompCas245(Kar); ILR1999KAR3032; 1999(6)KarLJ512
Sri Yovini Rajesh Rohra, Adv.
1. The brief facts leading to this appeal and which are not in dispute are, that the appellant is a registered firm carrying on business in export of readymade garments to various countries out of India....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWipro Ge Medical Systems, Vs. the Commissioner of Customs,
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Nov-27-2001
Customs
1. These two appeals arises out of and are directed against order in appeal dated 13.9.96, passed by the Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise (Appeals), Madras.2. At the outset Sh. Rajesh Chandra Kumar, appearing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHmt Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Feb-22-2002
Land Acquisition
(2003)(89)ECC744
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellants M/s. HMT Ltd. with reference to the impugned order no. C Cus. 195 to 197/2000, dated 20-3-2000, passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Customs House, Chennai....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mangalore Chemicals and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jan-08-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(59)ECC431
1. This appeal from revenue is taken up for disposal along with the cross appeal filed by the assessee since both the appeals arise out of the Collector's order dated 13.3.95.2. Briefly stated, the assessees were...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSouthern Founders Venus Metal Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-15-1999
Land Acquisition
(2000)(116)ELT508Tri(Chennai)
1. Since the issue involved in these appeals is identical, they are taken-up together by this single order.2. Briefly, the issue concerns the classification of Iron Cast articles. While the Revenue seeks to classify them either...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Mangalore Refinery and Vs. the Commissioner of C. Excise and
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
May-25-2001
Land Acquisition
(2001)(76)ECC808
1. These are two stay applications filed by the applicants for waiver of pre-deposit of duty amounting to Rs. 29,38,437/- in addition to penalty of Rs 2 lakhs and stay of the recovery proceedings.2. Arguing for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »