Advanced Search Results

Shri Pramod Sharma and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2005(80)DRJ184; 2006(2)SLJ94(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Benati, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioners by this petition seek quashing of list of Junior Engineer (Civil) Annexure P-6, dated 5th February, 2003 at page 66. Petitioners also seek a mandamus that Junior Engineers (Civil) who were selected...

Meera Maharishi Vs. Vijaya Bank

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Benati

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) No.7393/2012 10th September , 2013 % MEERA MAHARISHI Through: ......Petitioner Mr. Rajesh Benati, Adv. VERSUS VIJAYA BANK Through: ...... Respondent Mr. Kush Sharma and...

Veena Duggal Vs. H.S. Vedi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 114 and 151 - Order 47, Rule 1 - Order 9, Rule 13; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20 and 34; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2004(1)ARBLR590(Delhi); 110(2004)DLT747; 2004(74)DRJ54; (2004)137PLR1

Advocate for Appellant : G.L. Rawal and; Kuljeet Rawal, Advs

Mukundakam Sharma, J. 1. By this order I propose to dispose of application filed by the defendant No.1 which is registered as is No.8678/2002 filed under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC; application...

Om Parkash Vs. Rajni

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Reported in : I(2008)DMC16; 2007(96)DRJ641

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Khosla, Adv

S. Muralidhar, J.1. This appeal by the husband is directed against the judgment dated 1.4.1997 passed by the Addition District Judge (ADJ) Delhi dismissing the appellant's petition HMA No. 219 of 1990 for divorce from respondent...

Northern Aromatics Ltd. Vs. Shahzeb Khan and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Courts

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 215

Reported in : 2006(90)DRJ23

Advocate for Appellant : Girish Kaul, Adv

A.K. Sikri, J.1. The petitioner has filed CS(OS) No. 1903/1999 for recovery of Rs. 32,83,018 against M/s Bansal Cosmocare Ltd. It is, inter alia stated that the respondent admitted its liability vide letters dated 12th August,...

Phamachim Vs. Curewel (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1994(2)ARBLR340(Delhi); 56(1994)DLT393

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Rajesh Benati, Adv

Usha Mehra, J.1. M/s. Pharmachim has filed a summary suit under Order xxxvII of the Code of Civil Procedure (in short 'CPC') for recovery of Rs. 63,69,052/- against M/s. Curewel (India) Ltd. The suit is based...

Partap Gases and Chemicals (P) Ltd. Vs. Achal Investment Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 391

Reported in : 1996(38)DRJ292

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Benati,; S.B. Gautam and; A.W. Ansari, Advs

Vijender Jain, J.(1) This is a petition filed under Section 391 read with section 394 of the Companies Act 1956 for sanction of the scheme of arrangement/amalgamation of M/s.Partap Gases and Chemicals Private Limited (hereinafter referred...

M/S. Nandan Iron and Metal Industries Vs. M/S. Fenesty Inc.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 20; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 230; Partnership Act, 1932

Reported in : AIR1992Delhi364

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Benati, Adv

ORDER1. M/s. Nandan Iron & Metal Industries, (hereinafter called the 'plaintiff')has filed the suit for recovery of Rupees 1,83,410/- against the defendants on the allegations that plaintiff is a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act...

Union of India Vs. C.P. Kukreja

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 1999IAD(Delhi)266; 76(1998)DLT871; 1998(47)DRJ170; (1999)121PLR41

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Benati, Adv

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1.The objections to the arbitration award filed by the appellant were dismissed by learned Single Judge by judgment dated 5th February, 1993 for non-prosecution since none had appeared to prosecute the objections. While dismissing...

Daisy Trading Corporation Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 30 and 33

Reported in : 1999(48)DRJ807

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Benati, Adv

ORDERDR. M.K.Sharma, J.1.This common order shall dispose of the petition filed under Section 14 of the Arbitration Act as also the objection filed by the petitioner under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act. 2....