Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Laxmi Sales
Rajasthan
Feb-27-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)167CTR(Raj)311
Sandeep Bhandawat, for the revenue Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee
Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. This is an application under section 256(2) for requiring the Tribunal to state the case and refer the questions of law arising out of its order in ITA...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. the Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd.
Rajasthan
Jan-24-1985
Contract
1985(1)WLN745
Guman Mal Lodha, J.1. This appeal has been filed by the State of Rajasthan, the appellant-defendant, against the judgment and decree-dated 11th April, 1972 passed by the Additional District Judge No. 2, Jodhpur, decreeing the suit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income Tax Vs. Ramesh Chand Modi
Rajasthan
Jul-04-2000
Direct Taxation
(2000)163CTR(Raj)424
Sandeep Bhandawat, for the Appellant
Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.2. The appellant challenges the order passed by the Tribunal, dated 20-9-1999, in Misc. AppIn. No. 43/Jp/1998. The assessee -respondent preferred an appeal against the order passed by assessing...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commercial Taxes Officer Vs. Sardul Textiles Mills
Rajasthan
May-06-1988
Sales Tax
[1988]71STC223(Raj)
Rajesh Balia, Adv.
M.C. Jain, J.1. This revision is directed against the order of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Tribunal, Ajmer, dated January 31, 1986, whereby the appeal of the department was dismissed.2. Two questions of law have been urged...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Rajasthan Vs. Mehta Chetan Das Kishandass
Rajasthan
Jan-10-1980
ArbitrationLimitation
Limitation Act, 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 8(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1
AIR1981Raj36; 1978(11)WLN321; 1980()WLN13
Rajesh Balia, Dy. Govt. Adv.
ORDERS.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. This is an application for review under Order XLVII, Rule 1, C. P. C. against the order dated July 10, 1978 passed in S. B. Civil Revision Petition No. 594 of 1974...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevichand Bastimal and Bhanwarlal Manakchand Vs. Commissioner of Incom ...
Rajasthan
Apr-24-1985
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37(2B)
(1985)49CTR(Raj)43; [1985]156ITR166(Raj); 1985(1)WLN616
Rajendra Mehta and; Rajesh Balia, Advs.
S.K. Mal Lodha, J.1. Both these references were heard together and it will be convenient to dispose them of by a common order, for, the arguments in both the references are identical.2. We may first notice...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Sunil Talwar Murlidhar and Party
Rajasthan
Mar-30-2005
Direct Taxation
(2006)199CTR(Raj)422
Sangeet Lodha, for the Revenue. Vineet Kothari, for the Assessee.
Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. The Income Tax Appeal Nos. 39 of 2004 and 48 of 2004 arise out of the order passed by the Tribunal, Jodhpur Bench, Jodhpur, dated 15-7-2003, deciding the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Marudhar Hotel (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Feb-17-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN403(Raj)
S. Bhandawat, for the Revenue L.R. Mehta, for the Assessee.
ORDERRajesh Balia, J.Heard the learned counsel for the parties.2. The following substantial question of law arising out of the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench has been referred to this court in GTA No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Lake Palace Hotels and Motels (P) Ltd.
Rajasthan
Mar-21-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]132TAXMAN84(Raj)
Sandeep Bhandawat, for the Revenue Rajender Mehta, for the Assessee
Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the parties.2. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we are satisfied that in this appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the substantial question of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRaghuvir Soni Vs. Asstt. Cit
Rajasthan
Sep-14-2001
Direct Taxation
(2001)172CTR(Raj)105
Anjay Kothari, for the Assessee
Rajesh Balia, J.Heard learned counsel for the appellant.The appellant has sought to challenge the order passed by the Tribunal sustaining the levy of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »