Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rajesh · Page 1 of about 34,972 results (0.718 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 13 2006

Jawahar Yadav Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Feb-13-2006

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 205, 376, 415, 419, 420, 467 and 468; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 195, 362, 439 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 21

Reported in : 2006CriLJ2078

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Pandey and; A.K. Prasad, Advs.

ORDERDilip Raosaheb Deshmukh, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 12-2-2004 passed by Shri A. K. Gaikwad, 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Ambikapur, Surguja whereby the judgment of acquittal order under Section 376, I.P.C. delivered on 24-1...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 1999

J. Georje and Others Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-14-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)821; 1999(50)DRJ300

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Goyal, Adv

ORDERK. Ramamoorthy, J.1. In CWP. 524/97, the three petitioners, who are working as Laboratory Assistants in AES Sr.Secondary School, 1 DDU Marg, New Delhi-1, the third respondent have prayed for the following reliefs:- 'In the above...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 24 2002

Laxmi Shanker Pathak and anr. Vs. District Inspector of Schools and or ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-24-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Services Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 33A(1); Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 - Regulations 3(1) and 6

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2699; (2002)2UPLBEC1883

Advocate for Appellant : D.S.M. Tripathi and ;Rajesh Kumar, Advs.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. All these connected writ petitions raise dispute relating to seniority of petitioners Laxmi Shanker Pathak, Fateh Chandra Lal, Lalloo Chauhan, Rama Shanker Pandey, and Krishna Narain Singh in Uchchatar Madhyamik Vidyalaya, Durgaganj, Varanasi....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 26 2002

Subash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2002]122TAXMAN95(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, for the Petitioner

ORDERBy this writ petition the prayer has been made for quashing the order dated 22-11-1999 (Annexure-16) passed by the Commissioner (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed under rule 86(1) of the Second Schedule to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 26 2002

Subash Chandra Goyal Vs. Tax Recovery Officer and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-26-2002

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961; Income Tax Rules, 1961 - Rules 10(2), 52 to 68, 86 and 86(1)

Reported in : [2002]255ITR289(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Kumar, Adv.

R.B. Misra, J.1. By this writ petition, a prayer has been made for quashing the order dated November 22, 1999 (annexure 16), passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Tax Recovery), Agra, purported to have been passed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2005

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Haryana Hotels Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-17-2005

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 32(2), 33B, 35(4), 71, 72, 72(1), 72(2), 73(2), 74(1), 74(3), 74A, 74A(3), 80, 119(2B), 139, 139(1), 139(3), 143(3), 157, 254(2) and 260A

Reported in : (2005)197CTR(P& H)449; [2005]276ITR521(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Bindal, Adv.

Ajay Kumar Mittal, J.1. The Revenue feeling aggrieved by order dated October 9, 2001, passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'E', New Delhi (in short 'the Tribunal'), has filed this appeal under Section 260A...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 23 2003

Vibhuti Prasad Mishra Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-23-2003

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2003(4)AWC2994

Advocate for Appellant : Arun Tandon, ;Dhananjai Rai, ;Rajesh Nath Tripathi and ;Ekta Kaur, Advs.

R.B. Misra, J.1. Heard Sri Rajesh Nath Tripathi and Ekta Kaur, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.2. In this petition prayer has been made for issuance of writ of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2004

Sudhakar Singh Vs. U.P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-21-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh State Sugar Corporation Ltd. General Service Rules, 1988 - Rule 4; Uttar Pradesh Sugar Undertakings (Acquisition) Act, 1971

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2672

Advocate for Appellant : K.R. Sirohi and ;Rajesh Tiwari, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. By means of this writ petition the petitioner has prayed for a direction in the nature of mandamus, commanding the respondents U. P. State Sugar Corporation Ltd. to provide the pay scale of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 1998

Ved Prakash Agarwal Vs. District Judge, Kanpur Nagar and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-17-1998

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 16 and 16(5)

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC836

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Tandon, Adv.

J.C. Gupta, J.1. Heard petitioner's counsel Shri Rajesh Tandon as well as learned counsel for the caveator respondents.2. This writ petition is directed against the order of the Rent Control and Eviction Officer dated 12.5.1998 rejecting...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 27 2007

Maninder Pal Singh Kohli Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-27-2007

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Extradition Act - Sections 5 and 7(4); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 41

Reported in : 2007(97)DRJ178

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Srivastava, Adv

Mukul Mudgal, J.1. This petition seeks the review of the judgment of this Court dated 6th July 2007 by which this Court had upheld the findings recorded by the Extradition Magistrate under Section 7(4) of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial