Advanced Search Results

Vinod Kumar and anr. Vs. Keshav Anand

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 34 - Order 37, Rules 1 and 3(5); Negotiable Instruments Act - Sections 138

Reported in : 2002IVAD(Delhi)358; 96(2002)DLT424; 2002(62)DRJ128

Advocate for Appellant : Rajat Aneja, Adv

J.D. Kapoor, J.1. The facts giving rise to the application for leave to contest moved by the defendant under Order 37 Rule 3(5) of Civil Procedure Code are as under:- On representation of the defendant that...

Shri Ved Prakash Gulati Vs. Smt.Kusum

Court : Delhi

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act 1955 - Sections 28, 13 (1) (ia)

Advocate for Appellant : Mr.Rajat Aneja; Ms.Shweta Singh, Advs.

1. By this appeal filed under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, the appellant-husband seeks to set aside the judgment and decree dated 07.03.2003 passed by the learned trial court whereby the divorce petition...

Arun Kumar Nigam Vs Dig. Genl. Central Industry Security Fores and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Delhi Police

Acts : Delhi Police Act, 1979 - Sections 21 ; Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Section 21 ,1.

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajat Aneja and Mr. Gurmeet Singh, Adv

1. Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? YesORDER1. By way of...

Gurmesh Singh Vs. Lata Gupta and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 173, 166, 140; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9 Rule 13

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajat Aneja; Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advs.

1. This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is directed against the ex parte award dated 06.02.2008 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Rohini Courts, Delhi, whereby compensation in the sum...

Pehlad @ Bhagat Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 20

Reported in : 1999VIAD(Delhi)460; 1999CriLJ4696; 82(1999)DLT191

Advocate for Appellant : Sh. Rajat Aneja, amices Curai

ORDERK.S. Gupta, J.1. This appeal by Pehlad @ Bhagat accused/appellant is directed against the judgment dated 30th August, 1995 convicting him under Section 20 of Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short the 'Act')...

Jagdish Chander Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 482; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120-B and 420

Reported in : 1999IIIAD(Delhi)454; 1999(50)DRJ172

Advocate for Appellant : Shri Rajat Aneja, Adv

ORDERN.G. Nandi, J.1. Petitioner-accused has been praying for the quashing of F.I.R. No.283/95 of Police Station Kashmere Gate, Delhi for the offences under Sections 420/120-B Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC') by invoking the inherent jurisdiction...

Salmani Zamat Masjid and Educational Charitable Trust Vs. Delhi Develo ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 25; Delhi Development Act - Sections 22

Reported in : 96(2002)DLT143; 2002(61)DRJ787

Advocate for Appellant : Rajat Aneja, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.3. The petitioners Salmani Zamat Masjid & Educational Charitable Trust through its trustee Mohd. Abdul Hakeem has filed the present...

Kusum Sharma Vs. Mahinder Kumar Sharma

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Mr. Sunil Mittal, Ms. Vandana Khurana, Mr. Devesh Pratap Singh, Ms. Anu Narula, Mr. Kunal Aurora, Mr. Ashwani Kumar Sood, Mr. Rajiv Bakshi, Mr. Hasan Kumar, Mr. Osama Suhail, Mr. Samama Suhail, Dr. L.S. Chaudhary

PRAJAPATI SATYA DEV * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:14. h January, 2015 + % FAO3691996 KUSUM SHARMA Through : ..... Appellant Mr. Rajiv Saxena, Advocate Mr. Sunil Mittal, Amicus...

Braham Pal Singh and ors. Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P (C) No. 16955-60/2004 % Judgment reserved on:13. h September, 2012 Judgment delivered on:21 December, 2012 BRAHAM PAL SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Rajat...

Rajat Gupta vs.rupali Gupta

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Brij Bhushan Gupta, Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. Prashant Mendiratta, Mr. Koplin K. Kandhari, Mr. S.C. Duggal, Mr. F.K. Jha, Mr. S. A. Singh, Mr. Sunil Mittal, Mr. Dhruv Grover, Ms. Seema Seth, Mr. Ashish Virmani, Ms. Paridhi Dixit

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:15. 05.2018 + REFERENCE IN CONT.CAS(C) 772/2013, 347/2013, 484/2014, 584/2014, 648/2014, 48/2016, 483/2016, 484/2016, 1147/2016, 1116/2016, 1251/2016, 78/2017, 132/2017, 197/2017, 204/2017, 216/2017 and 270/2017...