Advanced Search Results
Renusagar Power Company Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer
Allahabad
Apr-25-1991
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 153; Constitution of India - Article 226
[1992]196ITR903(All)
Raja Ram Agarwal, Adv.
B.P. Jeevan Reddy, C.J.1. This is a petition for issuance of a writ in the nature of prohibition restraining the respondents (assessing authorities under the Income-tax Act) from proceeding with, or passing any orders in, the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMahadeo Prasad Rais Vs. Income-tax Officer, a Ward and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-21-1977
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 148, 150 and 297(2); ;Indian Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 25A and 150(1)
[1980]125ITR49(All)
Raja Ram Agarwal, Adv.
Satish Chandra, J.1. Sri Mahadeo Prasad, the petitioner, challenges the validity of notices issued under Section 148 of the I.T. Act, 1961, for the assessment years 1953-54 to 1963-64.2. Mahadeo Prasad, the petitioner, was being assessed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajoria Halwasiya Service Station Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh and a ...
Allahabad
Dec-08-1969
Sales Tax
[1970]26STC108(All)
Raja Ram Agarwal, Adv.
R.L. Gulati, J.1. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. The petitioner is a partnership firm which carries on business of automobile engineers and of running a service station and a workshop at...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Swadeshi Polytex
Allahabad
Sep-15-1980
Company
Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 236, 237, 238, 239, 397, 398 and 408; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 123 and 124
[1982]52CompCas483(All)
V.K. Burman and ;Raja Ram Agarwal, Advs.
A. Banerji, J. 1. The Swadeshi Cotton Mills Ltd., hereinafter referred to as the ' petitioner-company', made an application, A/83, for summoning certain documents including the 'report of the Company Law Board on Swadeshi Polytex, Ghaziabad,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAwadh Bihari Yadav and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-1995
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 11, 11A, 12, 17, 17(1), 48 and 54; Constitution of India - Article 226;Bihar Land Encroachment Act, 1956;
1996(44)BLJR7; JT1995(6)SC248; 1995(5)SCALE74; (1995)6SCC31; [1995]Supp3SCR197
Raja Ram Agarwal and; S.B. Sanyal, Senior Advs.,; V.K. Bhagat
K.S. Paripoornan, J.1. Leave granted.2. A batch of four writ petitions -CWJC No. 8426/88, CWJC No. 6373/88, CWJC No. 3720/90 and CWJC No. 9000/89, was heard and disposed of by the High Court of Patna by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAwadh Bihari and Other Vs. State of Bihar and Others
Supreme Court of India
Aug-31-1995
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 5A, 6, 8, 9, 11A, 12, 16, 17(1) and 48; Constitution of India - Article 215 and 226; Bihar Public Encroachment Land Act, 1976; Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Registration Act, 1908; Bihar Act, 1964, Sections 4(1) and 17(4)
AIR1996SC122
Raja Ram Agarwal,; V.K. Bhagat,; Manoj Yadav and;Irshad Ah
ORDERParipoornan, J.1. Leave granted. 2. A batch of four Writ Petitions: CWJC No. 8426/88, CWJC No. 6373/88, CWJC No. 3720/90 and CWJC No. 9000/89, was heard and disposed of by the High Court of Patna by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJaIn Shudh Vanaspati Ltd. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.
Allahabad
Jan-13-1983
Sales TaxConstitution
[1983]53STC54(All)
Raja Ram Agarwal and ;R.K. Agrawal, Advs.
R.M. Seth, J.1. Petitioners in all these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution are aggrieved by the action of the respondents in detaining their goods in the purported exercise of powers under Section 28-A of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarju Pd. Pritam Lal Vs. Judge, Revisions, Sales Tax
Allahabad
Dec-21-1962
Sales Tax
[1963]14STC884(All)
Raja Ram Agarwal and ;D.D. Seth, Advs.
M.C. Desai, C.J.1. This is a reference made by the Judge (Revisions), Sales Tax, under Section 11(1) of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, at the instance of the assessees, inviting this Court's answers to the following...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Surajpal Singh
Allahabad
Jul-11-1975
Direct Taxation
Income Tax Act, 1922 - Sections 22, 22(2), 22(4), 23, 23(4), 27, 28(1) and 34(3); Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 143(3), 271(1) and 297(2)
[1977]108ITR746(All)
Deokinandan, Adv.
R.L. Gulati, J. 1. This reference under the Income-tax Act raises some important and difficult questions of law. But, unfortunately, the assessee is not represented. We have, therefore, requested Sri Raja Ram Agarwal to assist us...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Prem Lata Agarwal Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax
Allahabad
Apr-26-1982
Direct Taxation
Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3 and 4(1)
(1982)29CTR(All)258; [1983]142ITR586(All); [1982]10TAXMAN222(All)
R.R. Agrawal, Adv.
Rastogi, J. 1. Both these references can be taken up together. The Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Allahabad (hereafter 'the Tribunal'), stated a case and referred the following questions of law for the opinion of this court...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »