Skip to content
Try for free

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rahul tarse · Page 1 of about 1 results (0.007 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Try free for 7 days How AI Brief works
Sep 29 2004

Fundacio Privada Intervida Vs. Additional Commissioner, Pune Division ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-29-2004

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 - Sections 24(2), 40 and 42

Reported in : 2005(2)ALLMR48; 2005(2)BomCR231; 2005(2)MhLj769

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Tarse, Adv., i/b., ;Udwadia and ;Udeshi, Advs.

Daga V.C., J.1. Rule returnable forthwith by consent of parties. Respondent No. 1 is a formal party, whereas Counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 waives service.2. Heard Counsels for the rival parties. Perused record of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

Try free for 7 days
  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales