Advanced Search Results

Savitri Devi Wife of Sri Ram Gyani Vs. the Commissioner, Azamgarh Divi ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC29

Advocate for Appellant : Mani Kant Srivastava, ;Rahul Sripat and ;Vimlendu Tripathi, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. Petitioner was granted a license in the year 1996 to run a fair price shop. By an order dated 2.11.2001 passed by Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Mau, Respondent No. 2, the license of...

Ram Naval Son of Sri Tameshar Vs. the Board of Revenue and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act - Sections 229B; Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act - Sections 4, 5 and 5(2)

Reported in : 2006(3)AWC2868

Advocate for Appellant : A. Chaturvedi and; R.S Mishra, Advs.

Janardan Sahai, J.1. A suit under Section 229-B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act was filed by Binda and Lalita transferors of respondent No. 6 against the petitioner and other defendants. The suit...

Ram Prakash Singh Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 2010(1)AWC97

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Rahul Sripat

A.P. Sahi, J.1. Heard Sri Rahul Sripat learned Counsel for Ram Prakash Singh the petitioner and Sri Yatindra for Bhedjeet Singh respondent No. 3 as well as learned standing counsel for the respondent Nos. 1 and...

Cattle Remedies and anr. Vs. Licensing Authority/Director of Ayurvedic ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Intellectual Property Rights

Reported in : 2007(2)AWC1093

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Rahul Sripat

Yatindra Singh, J.1. The controversy involved in these two writ petitions revolves around two of the intellectual property rights (I.P.Rs.) namely Patents and Trade marks; it also involves their interplay with the Drugs and Cosmetics Act,...

Mohd. Umar Vs. Nagar Palika Khatima, Nainital and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 279 to 282

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC764

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Sripat, Adv.

D.S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Sri Diwakar Ram Sharma. holding brief of Sri Rahul Sripat, learned counsel of the petitioner and Sri O. P. Singh. learned standing counsel representing the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. No body...

Vishwa Ingots (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Cegat

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35F; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1999LC838(Allahabad); 1999(113)ELT28(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Sripat, Adv.

M.G. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners, who are appellants before the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi challenge an order dated 26th June,...

Smt. Indra Sharma Vs. Lt. Col. S.K. Sharma and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 106; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 2(9) and 151 - Order 5, Rule 19A - Order 20, Rule 4(2) - Order 8, Rules 10, 5 and 5(2); Civil General Rule - Rule 89A

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3122

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, ;Rahul Sripat, ;Rajul Bhargava, ;P.K. Tripathi and ;Mridul Tripathi, Advs.

Poonam Srivastava, J.1. Heard Sri R. N. Singh, senior advocate, assisted by Sri Rahul Sripat and Sri Rajul Bhargava, advocates appearing for the revisionist Smt. Indra Sharma in Civil Revision No. 83 of 2005. Sri Ravi...

O.P. Sharma Vs. U.P. Awas Avam Vikas Parishad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Commercial

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Rahul Sripat

Rakesh Sharma, J.1. Heard Sri Rahul Sripat, learned Counsel for the plaintiffappellant and Sri A.P. Srivastava, Advocate, learned Counsel for the respondents.2. Through this Second Appeal, under Section 100 of the CPC, the plaintiff-appellant had assailed...

U.P. Sunni Central Board of Waqf Vs. Town Area Committee and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Reported in : 2009(85)AWC1996

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. M.K. Gupta, Sri. Daga

Pankaj Mithal, J.1. Heard Sri Rahul Sripat, learned Counsel appearing for the defendant-appellant and Sri M.K. Gupta with Sri Daga, learned Counsel for the plaintiff-respondent No. 1. The other respondents are only formal parties. They were...

Salim UddIn Ansari Vs. Additional District Judge and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3571

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. Arvind Srivastava

Poonam Srivastav, J.1. Heard Sri Arvind Srivastava, learned Counsel for the petitioner-tenant and Sri Rahul Shripat for the landlord-respondent.2. The petitioner-tenant challenged the judgment dated 5.5.2009 passed by the Special Judge, S.C./S.T. Act, Meerut confirming the...