Advanced Search Results

Narender H. Chandwani Vs. M.C.D. and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Enlistment Rules, 2008; Enlistment Rules, 2001; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 47, Rule 1; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 21

Reported in : 158(2009)DLT234

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta and; Rajnish Mishra, Advs

Vipin Sanghi, J.1. This writ petition had been heard and finally disposed of on 4.7.2008. The petition had been filed to seek a writ of certiorari to quash the decision of the MCD contained in its...

S. Sohan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 12 and 20; Delhi Land Reforms Act - Sections 13(1); Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 9 and 10; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 - Sections 11A; Evacuee Property (Officers) Act, 1951

Reported in : 2004(75)DRJ274

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta and; Rakesh Makhija, Advs

A.K. Sikri, J. 1. The question which requires to be determined in this case is as to whether the property/land, subject matter of this writ petition, was an evacuee property as on 23rd January, 1965 when...

S.C. Agarwal and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)CTLJ526(Del); 118(2005)DLT241; 2005(81)DRJ731

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta and; Rakesh Mukhija, Advs

D.K. Jain, J.1. Rule D.B.2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, we proceed to dispose of the matter at this stage itself.3. In this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the...

Mrs. Shilpi JaIn and ors. Vs. Anil Kumar Bansal (Huf) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 9, Rule 7

Reported in : 159(2009)DLT207

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta, Adv

S.N. Aggarwal, J.1. The plaintiffs have filed this suit against the defendants seeking a declaration that the suit property bearing mustil No. 62, Khasra No. (0-7) admeasuring 36 bigha, 8 biswa situated at village and PO...

Sukhwinder Singh Vs. Jagroop Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.760 OF2020(Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.10949 of 2019) Sukhwinder Singh .…Appellant(s) Versus Jagroop Singh & Anr. …. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.S. Bopanna,J.Leave granted.2. The...

M.l. Patil (dead) Thr Lrs. Vs. The State Of Goa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : RAHUL GUPTA __

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.4100 OF2022Shri M.L. Patil (Dead) Through LRs …Appellant(s) Versus The State of Goa and Anr. …Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied...

Nishi Gupta (Dr.) Vs. Dr. Rahul Gupta

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Reported in : RLW2009(2)Raj1091

Mahesh Chanda Sharma, J.1. The complainant petitioner has filed instant revision petition under Section 397 read with 401 Cr.P.C. against the impugned Judgment dated 3.6.2008 passed by Addl. District & Sessions Judge, No. 7, Jaipur City,...

Bal Vikas Public School and anr. Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Delhi School Education Act, 1973 - Sections 4 and 28

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi125; 2003(67)DRJ720

Advocate for Appellant : Rahul Gupta, Adv

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J.1. Petitioner by this petition seeks a writ of mandamus for upgradiation of the school from Secondary level to Senior Secondary level, as applied for vide application dated 15-3-1999. Request of the petitioner was...

S.C. Mehta Vs. Director of Enforcement

Court : Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Rajesh Gulati, H.C. Gulati and Rahul Gupta for the Appellant. Dr. Sham- suddin, DLA for the Respondent.

1. Appeal No. 273/95 has been filed against the Adjudication Order No. 119/ADJ/95/AD(BS)dated 26-6-1995 whereunder a penalty of Rs. 25,000 has been imposed on the appellant for contravention of section 9(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation...

Vaijanath S/O Trimbak Patre Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167, 209, 309, 367, 437, 439, 487 and 489; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 302, 406, 452, 504 and 506; Constitution of India - Articles 21 and 226

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR718; 2000(2)MhLj35

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Talekar, Adv.

ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Rule. Taken up for final hearing forthwith.2. Crime bearing No. 0065/98 came to be registered against the applicant for the offences punishable under sections 302, 452, 504, 506 r/w 34 of I.P.C. at...