Advanced Search Results

Punjab Urban Planning and Dev. Authority Vs. M/S. Shiv Saraswati Iron ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Contract

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)359; AIR1998SC2352; JT1998(2)SC587; 1998(2)SCALE451; (1998)4SCC539

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Rachna Joshi Issar

ORDERJudgment pronounced by K. Venkataswami, J.1. Special leave granted.2. Heard counsel on both sides.3. The appellant filed a suit for specific performance of the contract in question by returning (delivery) the goods weighing 124.255 Metric Tonnes...

National Airport Authority Vs. Nilu Sharma and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998VIIAD(SC)508; AIR1999SC194; JT1998(7)SC212; 1998LabIC3619; (1999)ILLJ811SC; 1998(5)SCALE618; (1998)8SCC133; 1999(1)LC298(SC); (1999)1UPLBEC86

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Rachna Joshi

ORDERNanavati, J. 1. Leave granted. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Nilu Sharma, respondent No. 1, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against the National Airports Authority (hereinafter referred to as...

Sohan Lal Kashyap Vs. Delhi State and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 438 and 482; Evidence Act - Sections 39 and 44

Reported in : 2002VAD(Delhi)829; 2002CriLJ3115; 97(2002)DLT517; 2002(62)DRJ560

Advocate for Appellant : Rachna Joshi Issar,; A.S. Qureshi,; Sudha Nalwa and;

S.K. Agarwal, J.1. This is second application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short, 'Cr.P.C.') for grant of pre-arrest bail in the case FIR No. 549/2001, under Section 379 IPC and Sections...

Union of India Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Government Labour Court ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33C

Reported in : 35(1988)DLT395; 1989(2)SLJ74(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : Rachna Joshi and; Bharat Singh, Advs

Leela Seth, J. (1) By this writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the Union of India through the General Manager, Northern Railway, New Delhi, seeks the quashing of the order...

Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority Vs. Bhupinder Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Consumer

Acts : Punjab Housing Development Board Act, 1972; Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995 - Sections 23; Consumer Protection Act, 1986

Reported in : (SCSuppl)2008(4)CHN113; III(2008)CPJ66(SC); [2009(1)JCR38(SC)]; JT2008(8)SC568; (2008)8MLJ255(SC); (2008)153PLR123; 2008(10)SCALE367; 2008AIRSCW6501

Advocate for Appellant : Rachna Joshi and; Rupal Bhatia, Advs

Altamas Kabir, J.1. Civil Appeal Nos. 7726 to 7730 arise out of a common order dated 18th September, 2001, passed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in respect of Revision Petitions Nos. 1056, 1057, 1058,...

Navendra Kumar and Others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited, Throu ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : For the Applicants: D.S. Chaudhary, Advocate. For the Respondent: Ms. Rachna Joshi Issar, Advocate.

DR. RAMESH CHandRA PandA, MEMBER (A) : 1. Shri Navender Kumar and Shri Ram Prashad are seeking direction of this Tribunal for upgradation of their pay to the scale of `17500-22300/- w.e.f. 1.10.2004 and also to...

H.C. Shastri Vs. DolphIn Canpack (P) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 1, Rule 10

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)798; [1998]93CompCas201(Delhi); 68(1997)DLT471; 1997(42)DRJ702

Advocate for Appellant : L.R. Gupta,; Mahendra Rana and; Rachna Joshi, Advs

Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) By this common order the following interim applications are being disposed of: IA.11883/95 under Order 1 Rule 10, CPC; IA. 11882/95 under Order Xxxix Rules 1 & 2, CPC; IA. 11881 under Order...

Fuljit Kaur,state of Punjab and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and Ors,g.S. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Section 18; Punjab Urban Estate Rules, 1965 , 2(aa), 2(e), 4,5

1. This is a unique case which reveals that an influential person can have allotment of a residential plot in discretionary quota within 48 hours of submission of application and then assert in Court that she...

Navendra Kumar, Delhi and Others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Education

G. George Paracken, M (J). The Applicants in this Original Application have sought the following reliefs:- (i) The Respondents be directed to re-fix the pay of the Applicants drawn by them in CDA pay scale as...

Daya Sah and Ors. Vs. Chandra Datt Pande and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

NON- REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4747-4749 OF2009Daya Sah and Ors. .. Appellants -vs- Chandra Datt Pandey and Ors. .. Respondents JUDGMENT C. NAGAPPAN, J.These appeals are preferred against...