Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rachita dhuru · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.029 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 20 2002

Sayed Mohammed Owais Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jun-20-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Evidence Act - Sections 9

Reported in : 2003BomCR(Cri)588; (2003)1BOMLR513; 2002CriLJ303; 2003(3)MhLj261

Advocate for Appellant : Rachita Dhuru, Adv.

J.G. Chitre, J.1.The appellant is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the order of conviction and sentences passed against him by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No. 260/1974, whereby he convicted...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 12 2009

Devendra Gurunath Khedgikar and ors. Vs. the Scheduled Tribe Certifica ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Feb-12-2009

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2009(4)BomCR805

Advocate for Appellant : Y.S. Jahagirdar, Sr. Adv. and ;Sarang Aradhye, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4840 of 2008, ;A.B. Avhad, Adv. in Writ Petition Nos. 4095 and 4840 of 2008 and ;Rachita Dhuru, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4095

V.C. Daga, J.1. Perused petition. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Counsel for respondents waives service. Heard finally by consent of parties.2. The Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is directed against the order...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 29 2002

Babasaheb Dadasaheb Koli Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-29-2002

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 227; Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 - Sections 12; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 154

Reported in : (2003)2BOMLR283; 2003(3)MhLj366

Advocate for Appellant : Shirish Gupte and ;Rachita Dhuru, Advs.

J.G. Chitre, J. 1. The petitioner is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the judgment and order passed in Criminal Revision Application No. 66 of 2000 (Old No. 227 of 1998), by the Additional Sessions...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial