Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r venkataraman · Page 1 of about 308 results (0.093 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 18 2000

Sivaram Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2000]110TAXMAN243(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataraman, for the Petitioner Ananda Ram, for the Respondent

ORDER1. Aggrieved by the order of the first respondent dated 20-1-1992, rejecting the request for waiver of interest and penalty for the assessment year 1988-89, the petitioner has filed the above writ petition for quashing the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 20 1997

M.C. Kuppuswamy and 2 Others Vs. the Commissioner of Police, Greater C ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-20-1997

Subject : Property

Acts : Tamil Nadu Cinema's (Regulation) Act, 1955 -- Sections 5(7); Tamil Nadu Cinema's (Regulation) Rules, 1957, Rule 13, 45, and 92; Constitution of India -- Article 226; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 -- Sections 108; Madras Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955; Specific Relief Act, 1963 -- Sections 6

Reported in : 1998(1)CTC601; (1998)IIMLJ113

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. V.R. Venkataraman,;Senior Counsel for Mr. S. Paskaran

ORDER1. This writ of certiorarified mandamus filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is to quash the order of the first respondent, the licensing authority in R.C.No.319/085685/E2(l)/96 dated 6.8.1996 renewing the licence in favour...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 18 2000

Sivaram Textiles Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-18-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 139(2), 148, 273A and 273A(1)

Reported in : [2000]244ITR136(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataraman, Adv.

P. Sathasivam, J.1. Aggrieved by the order of the first respondent dated January 20, 1992, rejecting the request for waiver of interest and penalty for the assessment year 1988-89, the petitioner has filed the above writ...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 30 2001

Altek Lammertz Needles Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2001)71TTJ(Mad)759

Advocate for Appellant : K. Rair, for the Assessee R. Venkataraman, for the Revenue

ORDERA. Kalyanasundharam, Senior V.P.These are two appeals preferred by the assessee, limited company, aggrieved by the common order of the Commissioner (Appeals)-IV, Chennai, dated 28-6-1999, wherein he had upheld the orders of the assessing officer in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1998

Thanjai Murasu (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 133A and 147

Reported in : [1999]239ITR280(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataraman, Adv.

Janakthanam, J.1. These two references relating to the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 raise a common question of law. The assessee, Thanjai Murasu (P.) Ltd., Madras, it is said, purchased newsprint for the purpose of printing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 20 1998

Chennai Murasu (P.) Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-20-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 147

Reported in : [1999]239ITR269(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataraman, Adv.

Janarthanam, J.1. These two references relating to the assessment years 1973-74 and 1974-75 raise a common question of law.2. The assessee, Chennai Murasu (P.) Ltd., Madras, it is said, had been purchasing newsprints for the purpose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 05 1998

Uni Rubber and Footwear (P) Limited Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-05-1998

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 12

Reported in : [2003]133STC629(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Aparna Nandakumar, Adv. for ;R. Venkataraman, Adv.

ORDERJanarthanam, J. 1. Desirable it is, to pen down a common order, inasmuch as the issue falling for consideration in all these actions is one and the same pertaining to the same assessee relatable to the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 28 2003

S. Viswanathan and anr. Vs. Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd., Rep. by Its Au ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-28-2003

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2004(2)CTC266

Advocate for Appellant : V.R. Venkataraman, Sr. Adv. for ;Baskaran and A. Dhiraviyanathan in O.A. No. 248 of 2002 and ;S. Srinivasaraghavan in C.S. No. 242 of 2002 and A. No. 2584 of 2002

ORDERR. Balasubramanian, J.1. This is an application filed by the first defendant under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to refer the parties to the suit to arbitration and consequently dismiss the suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1999

R. Gandhi Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-23-1999

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Civil Service(Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1981; Constitution of India - Article 32

Reported in : JT1999(6)SC206; 1999(5)SCALE151; (1999)8SCC106; [1999]Supp1SCR661; 1999(2)LC1373(SC); (2000)1UPLBEC269

Advocate for Appellant : R. Venkataraman,; V. Prabhakar,;Pallavi Choudhary an; Radha R

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. Leave is granted.2. This appeal, an off-shoot of the judgment of this Court in Common Cause v. Union of India : [1987]1SCR497 , arises from the judgment and order of a...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1998

Coimbatore Premier Corporation (P.) Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-21-1998

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25FFF; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 263

Reported in : [2000]244ITR445(Mad)

Advocate for Appellant : Aparna Nandakumar, Adv. for;R. Venkataraman, Adv.

Janarthanam, J. 1. The assessee-company--Coimbatore Premier Corporation (Private) Limited, Coimbatore--had a manufacturing and a trading unit. In the manufacturing unit, the assessee-company was manufacturing motors, pump sets and allied electrical products. In the trading unit, apart...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial