Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r vedantham · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.036 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 12 1997

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited Vs. Dulasi ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-12-1997

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(2); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1988 - Sections 149(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 to 103; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 22 and 33

Reported in : 1999ACJ136; 1997(3)CTC168; (1998)IMLJ609

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Narasimhan and ;R. Vedantham, Advs.

ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Since common questions involve in all the above appeals, the same may be disposed of by the following Orders:2. All the above appeals have been filed by the Insurance Company questioning its liability...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1991

Alagammai and Others Vs. V. Rakkamal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1991

Subject : Family

Acts : Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 273 and 278; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 13; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 41 and 42

Reported in : AIR1992Mad136; I(1993)DMC322

Advocate for Appellant : R. Vedantham Srinivasan, Sr. Counsel and ;K.R. Thiagarajan, Advs.

ORDERNainar Sundaram, J.1. Defendants 1 to 5 in O. S. No. 32 of 1976, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga, are the appellants in this Letters Patent Appeal. The respondent herein is the plaintiff...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1996

The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. C. Padma and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-05-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 166(3); Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 4 and 5 - Schedule - Article 137

Reported in : 1997(1)CTC761

Advocate for Appellant : R. Vedantham, Adv.

ORDERAR. Lakshmanan, J. 1. Heard Mr. R. Vedantham, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/insurance company.2. The revision is directed against the order passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Principal District Judge. Tirunelveli. in M.C.O.P.GL.No. 7455 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 31 2001

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vijay Kumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2003ACJ523

Advocate for Appellant : R. Vedantham, Adv.

K. Sampath, J.1. The above C.M.As. arise out of M.A.C.T.O.P. Nos. 1846, 1916 and 1855 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem. These three claim petitions arose out of a single...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2000

National Insurance Company Limited, Pudukottai Vs. V. Velammal and 4 O ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2000

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 -- Sections 147; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 -- Sections 95(1)(B); Motor Vehicles Act (Amendment), 1969 -- Sections 92-A, B; Evidence Act, 1872 -- Sections 101 to 103; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 -- Sections 3 and 4(A)

Reported in : 2002ACJ706; 2000(3)CTC291

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Vedantham, Adv.

ORDER1. All these three appeals arise out of a common order passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Ariyalur, in MCOP.Nos.406,407 and 413 of 1991. They are filed by the Insurance Company regarding an accident which...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 1999

Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. R. Thangaraj a ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-15-1999

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : 2001ACJ715; (1999)3MLJ708

Advocate for Appellant : R. Vedantham, Adv.

M. Karpagavinayagam, J.1. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. is the appellant herein.2. Challenging the award directing the appellant to pay the compensation amount of Rs. 59,067 payable to the claimant, respondent No. 1 herein, this appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 03 1989

Vaidyanatha Pillai Vs. Narasimhan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-03-1989

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 96(2)

Reported in : AIR1989Mad330

Advocate for Appellant : R. Kannan, Adv.

Padmini Jesudurai, J. 1. The claimant, who was awarded compensation by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal for injuries sustained by him an accident caused by the Jeep TNU 3220, belonging to the second respondent, insured with...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1982

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. P. Paul Also Known as Balan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-22-1982

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (1983)2MLJ559

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. C. Ramesh Babu

ORDERS. Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The third respondent in O.P. No. 158 of 1978 on the file of the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Madras, is the appellant in this appeal-The first respondent herein was the claimant;...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2001

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Vijayakumar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-31-2001

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Reported in : (2001)1MLJ548

K. Sampath, J.1. The above C.M.As. arise out of M.A.C.T. O.P.Nos. 1846 of 1992, 1916 of 1992 and 1855 of 1992 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Salem. Those three claim petitions arose...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1991

Alagammai and ors. Vs. V. Rakkammal

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1991

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1991)2MLJ86

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. G. Masilamani

Nainar Sundaram, J.1. Defendants 1 to 5 in O.S. No. 32 of 1976, on the file of the Subordinate Judge, Sivaganga, are the appellants in this Letters Patent Appeal. The respondent herein is the plaintiff in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial