Advanced Search Results

Indrasan Co-operative Housing Society Limited, having its office Vs. T ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.V.Govilkar

Oral Judgment: 1) Rule, with the consent of the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, made returnable forthwith and heard. Shri. Ramanathan C. Sadashivan waives notice on behalf of the Respondent No. 4 and Shri. S....

Kiran Rajaram Nimbalkar Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Right to Information Act (RTI); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(3)BomCR987; 2007(4)MhLj775

Advocate for Appellant : P.J. Thorat, ;Atul Pande and ;N.B. Kalwaghe, Advs.

Savant R.M., J.1. Rule. Rule with consent of the parties made returnable forthwith and heard finally.2. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges his non-selection to the post...

M/s. Mountain Villas, Proprietor Rajesh M. Sawant and Another Vs. Dy. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Nidhi Dotiya

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Since the challenge in both the petitions is to the same orders, it is only proper that both these petitions are disposed of with a common judgment and...

Vasant Jobanputra Vs. Bank of India Staff Sampada Co-operative Housing ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 91 and 101

Reported in : 2005(1)BomCR86; 2004(4)MhLj1093

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J. 1. This writ petition takes exception to the recovery certificate issued by the Deputy Registrar, Co-operative Societies, against the petitioner at the instance of the respondent Society dated March 18, 1989. The respondent...

Ramesh Laxman Sonawane Vs. Mrs Meenaxi Ramesh Sonawane

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Section 13(1)(1a), 13(1)(1b); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8 Rule 3

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

1. The appellant filed petition under Section 13(1)(ia) and 13(1)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as HMA) for divorce against the respondent in the District Court at Pune being Hindu Marriage Petition...

Om-sai Darshan Cooperative Housing Society (Proposed) and Chandrakant ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971 - Sections 3A(1), 3A(3), 3B, 3B(1), 3B(4), 3C, 3C(1), 3C(2), 3D, 3K, 3K(1), 3K(2), 3R, 4, 33, 35 and 38; ;Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 2(19); ;D.C. Regulations - Sections 33(10); Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(1)BomCR476

Advocate for Appellant : R.V.Govilkar, ;M.B.Jadhav and ;L.N. Bedekar, Advs.

Abhay S. Oka, J.1. Rule. Shri Sawant learned G.P. waives service for Respondents Nos. 1, 3 and 6. Shri Utangale waives service for Respondent No. 2, Shri Shah waives service for Respondent No. 4 and Shri...

Deepesh Pakhru Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : 2001(4)ALLMR640; 2001(4)BomCR637; (2001)4BOMLR500; 2001(4)MhLj636

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

H.L. Gokhale, J. 1. All these petitioners are graduate students, who have applied for the admission to M.B.A./M.M.S. course for which Common Entrance Test was conducted in the month of May, 2001. The interviews for the...

Food Corporation of India Vs. Great Eastern Shipping Co. Ltd

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Arbitration

Reported in : 1995(2)BomCR3; 1995(2)MhLj587

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

ORDERS.M. Jhunjhunuwala, J.1. By this petition, the petitioners seek to have the Award dated 21st June, 1991 filed in this court and numbered as 'Award No. 98 of 1991' (for short 'the said Award') set aside....

Nivrutti Gangaram Pawar, Since Deceased, Through His Heirs and Lrs Pra ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 29, 33A, 33B, 33B(5), 88C, 88C(4) and 88D

Reported in : 2004(2)ALLMR193; 2004(2)MhLj674

Advocate for Appellant : R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

A.M. Khanwilkar, J.1. This is yet another matter where the petty and small landlord has been waiting for the fruits of the statutory protection given to such landlords since 1962. The matter has been swinging like...

Kinjal Vasantrai Sangani and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 226, 341 and 342

Reported in : 2002(4)ALLMR10; 2003(1)BomCR284

Advocate for Appellant : Ramrao Adik, Sr. C. and ;R.V. Govilkar, Adv.

D.B. Bhosale, J.1. All the twenty-four writ petitions involve similar facts and common issues and, therefore, are being disposed of by this common judgment. In these writ petitions, the petitioners are seeking directions to the respondent...