Advanced Search Results
Chabada Petrol Pump Vs. Shaikh Hasan Shaikh Husain
Mumbai
Jun-16-2007
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11, 11A, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 16(2), 17, 17A, 17(1) and 17(2); Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rules 26, 26(1), 26(2), 31A, 31A(1) and 31(2)
2007(5)ALLMR573; 2007(6)BomCR624; [2007(114)FLR593]; 2007(5)MhLj738
R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
Deshmukh S.B., J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard forth with by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. Heard learned Counsel Mr. R.V. Ghuge for the petitioner and learned Counsel Mr. M.N. Deshmukh for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBajaj Auto Limited Through Its Assistant Manager-personnel Dilip Hanam ...
Mumbai
Dec-22-2006
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 10, 10(1), 10(2) and 33A; Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Contract Labour Act; Constitution of India - Article 226
2007(2)BomCR280
J.P. Cama, Sr. Adv. and ;R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
Naresh H. Patil, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents waive service.2. The petitioner has sought for a writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for striking...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAurangabad Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Mumbai
Feb-10-2012
Land Acquisition
2. Mohammad Sidiqque Mohd. Isaq, Age 38 yrs., Occu. Service Aurangabad, R/o. 83-B, Aref Colony, New Faizan Masjid, Aurangabad.3. Uttam s/o. Govindrao Jadhav, Age 45 years, Occu. Service As Senior Lecturer, JNEC College, Aurangabad, R/o. 83,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Kalidas Devram Patil
Mumbai
Sep-21-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11-A
2000(1)ALLMR413; 2000(2)BomCR630; [2000(84)FLR157]; 1999(3)MhLj857
R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. Heard Shri Ghuge, learned Counsel for the petitioner Company and Shri S.S. Pawar, learned Counsel for the respondent employee. Rule. Taken up for final hearing forthwith, by consent.2. The respondent employee came to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Gautam Hari Vedi and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-16-2000
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28 and 59; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 3, 10(1), 12(3), 17A, 18(1), 20, 30(2), 33(2) and 44; Industrial Disputes (Bom.) Rules 1957 - Rule 62; Payment of Wages Act, 1936
2001(1)BomCR335; (2001)1BOMLR155; [2001(89)FLR95]; 2000(4)MhLj326
K.K. Singhvi, Senior Counsel and ;R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
B. H. Marlapalle, J.1. The appellant/petitioner has assailed the order dated 28th April, 2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1602 of 2000 to the extent of refusal to grant interim relief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBaburao Dadarao Kolhe and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.
Mumbai
Jan-20-2004
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 28; Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 107
[2004(101)FLR99]; (2004)IILLJ705Bom; 2004(2)MhLj898
R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
A.P. Deshpande, J.1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent of parties.2. The present petition has been filed in a representative capacity for and on behalf of the workers, working with the third respondent - Godavari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJohnson and Johnson Ltd. Vs. Gautam Hari Vedi and ors.
Mumbai
Sep-16-2000
Labour and Industrial
Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 59 and 238; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 33(2)
(2001)ILLJ573Bom
K.K. Singhvi and ;R.V. Ghuge, Advs.
B.H. Marlapalle, J. 1. The appellant/petitioner has assailed the order dated April 28, 2000 passed by the learned single Judge in Writ Petition No. 1602 of 2000 to the extent of refusal to grant interim relief...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskLupIn Laboratories Ltd. and ors. Vs. J.P. Gaikwad and ors.
Mumbai
Jun-23-2008
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 12(5)
[2008(119)FLR293]; (2009)ILLJ14Bom
R.V. Ghuge, Adv.
P.R. Borkar, J.1. These two writ petitions are challenging the orders passed by the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Aurangabad in Reference (I.D.A.) No. 207/1989 decided on November 16,1995 whereby the learned Presiding Officer directed the first...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMr. R.V. Ghuge, Director Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the
Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Mar-14-2008
Service Tax
1. By an order in the name of the President dated 21.4.2005, applicant had been dismissed from service. The applicant was holding the position of Director, Cabinet Secretariat during that time. Dismissal was preceded with formalities...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Chief Executive Officer Vs. Satish S/O Dnyanoba Gaikwad
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jul-02-2013
Labour and Industrial
R.V. Ghuge, J. 1. The appellant, being aggrieved by order dated 22.11.2012, passed by learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No.2946/2012, has preferred this intra Court appeal for challenging the said order of the learned Single...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »