Advanced Search Results
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Morarji Goculdas Spg. and Wvg. Co. Ltd.
Mumbai
Nov-26-1999
Direct Taxation
[2000]108TAXMAN502(Bom)
S.E. Dastur, B.V. Jhaveri and JI. Patel, for the Applicant R.V. Desai and B.M. Chatterjee, for the Respondent
Saraf, J.By this reference under section 2 56(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question of law to this Court for opinion:'Whether, on the' facts and in the circumstances of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTaparia Tools Ltd. Vs. Jt. Cit
Mumbai
Jan-08-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]126TAXMAN544(Bom)
S.E. Dastur, Sanjiv Shah and A.K. Jasani, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and K.R. Choudhari, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.The above six appeals have come before this court under section 260A of the Income Tax Act. Income Tax Appeal Nos. 88 of 2001, 89 of 2001 and 90 of 2001 are filed by...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Matchwell Electricals (i) Ltd.
Mumbai
Dec-11-2002
Direct Taxation
[2003]127TAXMAN159(Bom)
R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue S.N. Inamdar and P.Y. Vaidya, for the Assessee.
S.H. Kapadia, J.This Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has come for our opinion at the instance of the department. The said Reference concerns assessment years 1977-78 and 1978-79, The question referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Premier Automobiles Ltd. Vs. Ito
Mumbai
Apr-09-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]129TAXMAN289(Bom)
S.E. Dastur, J.D. Mistry and B.D. Damodar, for the Assessee R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the Judgment and order passed by the Tribunal dated 18-11-2002, in Income Tax Appeal No. 3580/MUM/99, Premier Auto Ltd. has filed this Appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Bank of Baroda
Mumbai
Mar-12-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]129TAXMAN716(Bom)
R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue P.L Pardiwala and Mrs. J.N. Shah, for the Assessee
S.H. Kapadia, J.For assessment year 1982-83, the Tribunal has referred to following question for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act at the instance of the department :'Whether on the facts and in...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCaprihans India Ltd. Vs. Tarun Seem, Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Jul-24-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]132TAXMAN123(Bom)
P.J. Pardiwala, for the Assessee R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Ms. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.Rule. Respondents waive service.2. By consent, writ petition is taken up for final hearing.3. Heard learned counsel on both sides. In this case, arguments were heard by us on 24-7-2003. After hearing the arguments,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Shatrunjay Diamonds
Mumbai
Jan-29-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]128TAXMAN759(Bom)
R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetley, K.R. Chaudhari and K.B. Rao, for the Revenue S.J. Mehta and Ms. A. Vissanjee, for the Assessee
J.P. Devadhar, J.The revenue has filed this tax appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd.
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN730(Bom)
R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue F. V. Irani and A.K. Jasani, for the Assessee
S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the judgment and order dated 20-8-2001 passed by the Tribunal in Income Tax Appeal No. 9987/Bom./92 for assessment year 1989-90, the department has come by way of appeal under section 260A...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCit Vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Co. (P) Ltd.
Mumbai
Jul-22-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]132TAXMAN788(Bom)
R.V. Desai, P.S. Jetly and Mrs. S.V. Bharucha, for the Revenue S.J Mehta and Ms. A. Vissanji, for the Assessee
S.H. Kapadia, J. At the instance of the department, the following two questions have been referred to us for our opinion under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act concerning assessment year 1972-73.2. For the sake...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. Vs. Dy. Cit
Mumbai
Apr-30-2003
Direct Taxation
[2003]130TAXMAN422(Bom)
F.V. Irani and A.K. Jasani, for the Assessee R.V. Desai and P.S. Jetly, for the Revenue
S.H. Kapadia, J.Being aggrieved by the decision of the Tribunal dated 20-8-2001 in ITA No. 9987/Bom/92 in respect of assessment year 1989-90, the assessee has come by way of appeal under section 260A of the Income...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »