Advanced Search Results

Malaprabha Co-operative Society Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 - Sections 24 and 25; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 24, 25 and 151; Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964 - Sections 31(2) and 81(2)

Advocate for Appellant : M.B. Nargund, Adv. and ;R.U. Goulay, Adv. in IA No. I

ORDERMurlidher Rao, J. 1. Sy. No. 3 situated in the village limits of Madhavapur known as Kandak was a vacant land. Certain people were displaced in Malaprabha water scheme. It is to rehabilitate the displaced persons...

Baburao Yashvantrao Jadhav Vs. Shamrao Khandi Jadhav

Court : Karnataka

Subject : PropertyFamily

Acts : Easements Act, 1882 - Sections 13, 15 and 41

Reported in : AIR1992Kant181; 1992(1)KarLJ164

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, ;U.L. Narayana Rao and ;C.H. Jadhav, Advs.

1. This second appeal between two cousins residing in a remote village called Deginal in Indi taluk, Bijapur District and owning adjacent agricultural lands hearing Block Nos. 64/1 and 69/1 of the same village inherited by...

Sri Siddartha Education Society (Registered), Gollahalli, Tumkur Taluk ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Private Educational Institutions (Discipline and Control) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 8 and 10; Indian Medical Council Act, 1956; Constitution of India - Article 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 115; Kerala Land Reforms Act - Sections 103; Karnataka Education Act, 1983; Karnataka Education Tribunal Act; Medical Council Act, 1956 - Sections 17, 19 and 33; Dentists Act, 1948; Pharmacy Act, 1948; Karnataka State Universities Act, 1976; All Indian Council for Technical Education Act, 1987; Indira Gandhi National Open University Act, 1985; National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993; Karnataka Ayurvedic and Unani Practioners' Miscellaneours Provisions Act, 1961; Karnataka Homoeopathic Practitioners Act, 1961

Reported in : 1999(4)KarLJ707

Advocate for Appellant : Sri R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDER1. A preliminary objection has been raised on the maintainability of the revision. This revision was originally filed as writ petition and it bears No. 29411 of 1998. Later on it appears to have been converted...

K.G. Jayaseelan Vs. the State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules 1971 - Rule 96(2); Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1964 - Sections 18

Reported in : AIR1976Kant71; 1975(2)KarLJ285

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDER1. The petitioner applied for the grant of touring cinema licence under the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) t, 1964, hereinafter referred to as the Act, read with the Karnataka Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1971, hereinafter referred to as...

Vimala Bai Vs. District Magistrate

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Civil

Acts : Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers Act, 1985 - Sections 3, 3(2), 3(3), 12 and 13

Reported in : ILR1988KAR648; 1988(3)KarLJ579

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDERShivashankar Bhat, J.1. Petitioner challenges the detention of her husband under the provisions of Section 3 of the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Gamblers, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum-Grabbers Act, 1985 (Karnataka...

Chandrasekharappa Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : State Co-operative Land Development Bank and Primary Land Development Banks Pool Officers Rules, 1966 - Rule 9; Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, - Sections 70 and 128A; Karnataka Co-operative Societies Rules - Rule 17A

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay and ;S.L. Simha, Advs.

ORDERChandrakantaraj Urs, J.1. These two Petitions are being disposed of by the following common order as they involve the same substantial question of law though the prayers in the two petitions are differently worded.2. In Writ...

Lalithamma Vs. Selection Committee for Admission to Medical Colleges, ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Admission to Medical Colleges in the State of Mysore Rules - Rules 9 and 10(8)

Reported in : AIR1972Kant37; AIR1972Mys37; (1971)2MysLJ361

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

Venkataswami, J. 1. The petitioner herein has sought for the issue of a Writ or Direction or Order against the respondents, to consider her case for admission to the First Year M. B. B. S. Course...

Abdulsab Rajasab Vs. the Special Deputy Commissioner, District Dharwar ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Property

Acts : Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1962 - Sections 133; Karnataka Land Revenue Act; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 114

Reported in : AIR1977Kant4; 1976(2)KarLJ117

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDER1. What has been challenged by the petitioner in this writ petition is the order made by the Special Deputy Commissioner, Dharwar, in proceedings pertaining to making entries in the record of rights.2. This Court has...

Narasimha Vs. Yellappa Amhase

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 41, Rule 27

Reported in : AIR1973Kant317; AIR1973Mys317; ILR1973KAR220; (1973)1MysLJ353

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDERVenkataswami, J.1. This petition by the tenant under Section 50 of the Mysore Rent Control Act, 1961, is directed against an order made by the Second Addl. District Judge, Dharwar, in Civil Appeal No. 181/65, whereby...

M.M. Yaragatti Vs. Vasant Siddoji Jadhav and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : TenancyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Karnataka Rent Control Act, 1961 - Sections 50; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1977Kant196; ILR1977KAR1262; 1977(2)KarLJ243

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Goulay, Adv.

ORDER1. This is a petition for review of the Order of this Court dated 4-8-1976 in C.R.P. No. 2611 of 1973 where by H.R.C. No. 45 of 1970 is allowed and the petitioner tenant is directed...