Advanced Search Results

Smt. Anjum Ara Vs. Xith Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : U.P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1) and 22; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2001(2)AWC1570

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Qadeer and ;R.U. Ansari, Advs.

B.K. Rathi, J. 1. The petitioner moved an application under Section 21 (1) fa) of U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972 (hereinafter called the Act) for the release of the premises in possession of respondent...

Smt. Anisun Nisa Azmi Wife of Shri Abdul Ahad Azmi Vs. District Inspec ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceContempt of Court

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1470

Advocate for Appellant : M.A. Qadeer and ;R.U. Ansari, Advs.

Vineet Saran, J.1. By an order dated 15.9.2003 passed by Hon'ble the then Chief Justice, all these three petitioners have been assigned to this Bench for hearing. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged and with...

Phoolwati (Smt.) and ors. Vs. Viiith Additional District and Sessions ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 21(1), 24 and 24(2); Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules - Rule 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC797; 2005(3)AWC2160

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jain, Adv.

Mukteshwar Prasad, J.1. This petition by the tenants under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed for quashing the order-dated 19.11.1999 passed by respondent No. 1 in Rent Control Appeal No. 33 of...

Anil Kumar Vs. District Magistrate, Badaun and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1916 - Sections 293, 293A and 298; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC464

Advocate for Appellant : C.P. Ghildayal, Adv.

D. S. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Shiv Nath Dey. holding brief of Shri C. P. Ghildayal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Shri R. U. Ansari, holding brief of Shri N. I. Jafri, learned counsel representing...

Ghulam Ashraf Vs. Abdul Khalik (D) Through L.Rs. and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 46 and 47 - Order 34, Rules 2, 3, 7, 7(1), 8 and 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2006All149; 2006(2)AWC1291

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Ansari, Adv.

Prakash Krishna, J. 1. The present writ petition arises out of an order passed in execution case. The petitioner is a judgment debtor and the respondent No. 1 is decree holder.2. The facts in brief are...

Surya Nath Pandey Vs. 4th Addl. District Judge, Gorakhpur and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, 16(5), 18 and 34(8); Uttar Pradesh Urban Building (Regulation of Letting, Rent and Eviction) Rules, 1972 - Rules 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 , 16 and 28; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2000(4)AWC2933

Advocate for Appellant : R.U. Ansari and ;H.N. Singh, Advs.

R. H. Zaidi, J.1. Present petition arises out of proceedings under Section 16 of the U. P. Urban Buildings (Regulation of Letting. Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 (U. P. Act No. XIII of 1972), (for short...

Amar Nath Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : (1998)3UPLBEC1885

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Bahadur Singh, ;R.U. Ansari and ;N.I. Jafri, Advs.

O.P. Garg, J.1. Both these writ petition deal with the same controversy. Counter and rejoinder affidavits have been exchanged in writ petition No. 38406 of 1996. With the consent of the Parties Counsel, counter and rejoinder...

The CM, Thru' Managemenet, Thru' Manager M.H.M.H.S.S. And Anr Vs. Shoa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shamim Ahmad; R.U. Ansari, Advs

1. The appellants are aggrieved by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 21.4.2010, whereby he has allowed the writ petition filed by respondent no.1. 2. The father of respondent no.1 was employed with appellant...