Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r thadani · Page 1 of about 24 results (0.043 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 10 2000

Punjab Auto Agencies Vs. Rajinder Kumar Bansal

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-10-2000

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : 2000(55)DRJ741

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Thadani, Adv

Arun Kumar, J.1. Plaintiff/respondent herein had filed a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,15,986/- against the defendant/appellant herein. The plaint was founded on the averment that the plaintiff had supplied certain automobile items to the appellant...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 1987

Kalawati Vs. Shri Chand and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-15-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1; Punjab Preemption Act, 1913 - Sections 16

Reported in : 34(1988)DLT403

Advocate for Appellant : J.K. Jain,; C.L. Dhawan and; D.R. Thadani, Advs

H.C. Goel, J. (1) Smt. Kalawati, plaintiff/appellant, filed a suit against the defendants for a decree of possession by pre-emption of the house No. 4263, Gali Punjabiyan, Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, Delhi. The allegations of the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2009

Jaipur Golden Gas Victims Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2009

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 417; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 174; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 284, 285, 304A, 336 and 337; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32 and 226

Reported in : 164(2009)DLT346

Advocate for Appellant : Aruna Mehta, Adv

Manmohan, J.1. Present writ petition has been filed by petitioner-Association in public interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, direction or order inter alia directing respondents to pay...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 11 1974

The Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-11-1974

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Railway Act, 1890 - Sections 73

Reported in : ILR1974Delhi311b

Advocate for Appellant : Ravinder Sethi,; R.L. Aggarwal,; S.S. Chadha and;

H.L. Anand, J.(1) This is a suit for the recovery of Rs. 34,326.00 and the principal question that it raises is as to whether the derailment of a railway train could constitute in law an act...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 1997

Jagat Talkies Distributors and ors. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-17-1997

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 7A

Reported in : (1997)IILLJ133Del

Advocate for Appellant : Raj Birbal, Adv

1. The present petition is directed against the respondents impugning the order dated July 24, 1984 passed by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner which directed the petitioner establishment to produce the record as mentioned in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 1997

G.D. Ferro Alloys (P) Ltd. Vs. Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jul-25-1997

Subject : Electricity

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997IVAD(Delhi)985; AIR1997Delhi17; 68(1997)DLT212; 1997(42)DRJ747

Advocate for Appellant : Vinay Bhasin,; H.L. Raina,; Rakesh Tikku,;

D.K. Jain, J. (1) The issue involved in this bunch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, which we propose to dispose of by this common judgment, is identical. The petitioners have...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 1991

Tata Projects Limited Vs. N.E.i. Projects (India) Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-20-1991

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 20; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 38, Rule 1

Reported in : 1991(1)ARBLR419(Delhi); 1991(20)DRJ379

Advocate for Appellant : R. Thadani,; V.P. Singh and; Krishan Kumar, Adv

D.P. Wadhwa, J. (1) These arc two applications filed in the petition (though registered as Suit) under Section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act' or even the 'Arbitration Act'). First-...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1995

Ravinder Kishinchand Thadani and anr. Vs. Bhagwan Kundanmal Hira and a ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-08-1995

Subject : Property

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT276

Advocate for Appellant : B.L.Wali and; D.R.Thadani, Advs

N.G. Nandi, J. (1) By this application, defendant No. I prays for direction to New Delhi Municipal Committee (NDMC) to permit defendant No. I to construct the staircase within the area physically allotted to defendant No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 16 1993

Delhi Printing and Publishing Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-16-1993

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 14, Rule 1; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 21 and 23

Reported in : AIR1993Delhi320; 49(1993)DLT722

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Thadani, Adv

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order dated 23-3-1990 passed by Shr. A. S. Dateer, Sub Judge, Delhi whereby he has framed the following issue:'1. Whether any bona fide dispute exists between the parties?...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 11 1957

Mohinder Singh S. Shmsher Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Dec-11-1957

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 29, 29(2), 40, 40(1) and 40(2); Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) (Amendment) Rules, 1955 - Rules 102

Reported in : AIR1958P& H212

Advocate for Appellant : D.R. Thadani, Adv.

ORDERD. Falshaw, J.1. This is a Writ Petition by Mohinder Singh, under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging certain proceedings under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act 1954, culminating in an order of Mr. Sarup...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial