Advanced Search Results
Vanavil Dyes and Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex., Madras
Chennai
Feb-23-1996
Excise
Central Excise Rule, 1944 - Rules 12, 57A, 57F(1), 173H and 173H(2); Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 35, 35A, B(1), EE, EE(1), EE(2) and EE(4); Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985
1996(88)ELT318(Mad)
Shri R. Sashidharan, Adv.
ORDER1. By consent of both parties, the main writ petition itself is taken up for hearing. I have heard Mr. R. Sashidharan for the petitioner and Mr. K. Jayachandran for the respondents. 2. The writ petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskZinc Products Vs. Union of India
Chennai
Feb-11-1991
Excise
1992(57)ELT222(Mad)
Shri R. Sashidharan, Adv.
ORDERNainar Sundaram, J. 1. There are four Writ Appeals. The parties are two in number. M/s. Zinc Products preferred W.P. No. 19387 of 1990, impugning the order dated 26-6-1990 of the Central Board of Excise and...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.K.S. Kader Mohideen Sahib and Sons Vs. Joint Secretary, M.F. (D.R.)
Chennai
Sep-27-2001
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 76; Constitution of India - Article 226
2002(139)ELT558(Mad)
R. Sashidharan, Adv.
ORDER1. The prayer in the writ petition is for issue of a writ of certio-rarified mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent culminating in its Order Nos. 143-157/97 to the Government of India dated...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
itc Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Apr-16-1998
Land Acquisition
(1998)(77)LC411Tri(Chennai)
Shri. R. Sashidharan
1. This is an appeal filed by the appellant against the orders passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) in Order No. 421/97 dt. 31.3.1997. In terms of that order, he upheld the orders passed by the Asstt.Commissioner,...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSandeep K.G. vs State of Kerala
Kerala
Feb-26-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 / 7TH PHALGUNA, 1942 OP(KAT).No.56 OF 2021 AGAINST THE...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAsia Tobacco Company Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Chennai
Aug-10-1984
Direct Taxation
Companies Act, 1956; Central Excises Rules, 1944 - Rule 8(1); Central Excises Act, 1944 - Sections 11B; Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957 - Sections 3(3); Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 - Sections 8(1); Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 9; Madhya Pradesh Prathamik Middle School Tatha Madhyamik Shiksha (Pathya Pustakon Sambandhi Vyavastha) Adhiniyam, 1973 - Sections 3; Constitution of India - Article 226; Defence of the Realm Regulations
(1985)45CTR(Mad)306; 1985(5)ECC53; 1985(5)LC1637(Madras); 1984(18)ELT152(Mad); [1985]155ITR568(Mad)
R. Sasidaran, Adv.
Nainar Sundaram, J.1. The petitioner in these three writ petitions is one and the same. It is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner manufactures cigarettes in its factory at Hosur, Dharmapuri District....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Aski.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-22-2002
Service Tax
(2003)(153)ELT671Tri(Chennai)
1. This appeal arises from Order-in-Appeal No. M. Cus. 465/95, dated 29-12-94 by which the Commissioner (Appeals) has held that the imported item "Indian filter king hinged lid cartons" are rightly classifiable under Customs Tariff heading...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askinternational Clearing and Vs. Collector of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Feb-01-1983
Customs
(1983)LC596DTri(Chennai)
1. Appeal under Section 129 of the Customs Act, 1962, praying that in the circumstances stated therein the Tribunal will be pleased to set aside the order of the lower authority with a direction to admit...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKiddy Concepts (P) Ltd. Vs. Cc
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Jun-30-1999
Customs
(2000)(90)LC769Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal against order-in-ap-peal No. M. CUS. 434/91 dated 17.1.1991 passed by Commissioner.2. Heard Shri R. Sashidharan, Ld. Advocate for appellants and Ms.Mythili, Ld. Advocate. (i) The appellants established an SSI unit for...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.L.J. Plastics Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu
Nov-12-1999
Customs
(2000)LC124Tri(Chennai)
1. This is an appeal against Order-in-Appeal No. C. Cus. 486/99, dated 6-8-1999 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals) wherein the present appellants' appeal before her was rejected. In the attendant Order-in-Original No. 318/99, dated 28-6-1999 passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »