Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r s patel · Page 1 of about 128 results (0.145 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 02 2002

Smt. Nanbai and ors. Vs. Vijay Kumar Awasthi and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-02-2002

Subject : Motor VehiclesCivil

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 128, 168, 171 and 173

Reported in : 2003ACJ1990; 2002(3)MPHT279; 2002(3)MPLJ240

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Patel, Adv.

ORDERBhawani Singh, C.J. 1. This appeal is directed against the award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Shahdol, in Claim Case No. 4 of 1991, dated March 3, 1992.2. Accident look place on 8-11-90 when deceased Kushal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 31 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Anil Kumar Grover

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Mar-31-2003

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT534

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Patel, Sr. Adv.

ORDERS.L. Jain, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 19-9-2002 passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 3391/2002, the appellants have filed this appeal under Clause 10 of Letters Patent.2. The brief resume...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 06 2004

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-06-2004

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 201, 302 and 364; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 366(1); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 24 and 27

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT106; 2004(4)MPLJ102

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Patel, Additional Adv. General in Criminal Reference No. 3/2004, ; Narendra Nikhare and ; P. Parikh, Advs. in Criminal Appeal No. 699/2004

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. The learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdol has referred this death reference under Section 366(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code'), is heard along with Criminal Appeal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 15 2003

Brajendra Kumar Soni and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-15-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 71

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT201

Advocate for Appellant : Prabhakar Singh, Adv.;R.S. Patel, Sr. Stnding Counsel

ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. This order will decide a batch of petitions, list of which is enclosed alongwith this order.2. The common point involved in the cases is the allocation of the employees from State of Madhya...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2004

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Hashiboo Nisha and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-15-2004

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 18 and 23(1)

Reported in : 2004(3)MPHT463; 2004(4)MPLJ159

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Patel, Additional Adv. General

A.K. Shrivastava, J.1. This appeal has been preferred by the State of Madhya Pradesh against the award dated 18-7-1991 passed by the District Judge, Mandla.2. A reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 25 2003

Ramesh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-25-2003

Subject : Narcotics

Acts : Narcotic Durgs and Psychotropic Substances (Amendment) Act, 2001- Sections 41 and 41(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226

Reported in : 2004CriLJ62; 2003(4)MPHT78

Advocate for Appellant : S.C. Datt, Sr. Adv. (Amicus Curiae)

Dipak Misra, J.1. This writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was instituted at the instance of the petitioner who has been convicted under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 24 2003

Shyam Narayan Chouksey Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-24-2003

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 51A; Prevention of Insults to National Honour Act, 1971 - Sections 3; Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5A

Reported in : AIR2003MP233; 2004(3)MPLJ216

Advocate for Appellant : Vijay Paney, Adv.;V.K. Tankha, Adv. General

Dipak Misra, J.1. In the days of yore it was vocally pronounced with immense emphasis that a drum beat may travel to a maximum limit of four miles but the utterances made by one man, through...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2005

Raghuraj Pratap Singh Vs. State of M.P.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 - Sections 3, 3(3), 4, 32, 32(1), 32(5), 34, 49, 49(6) to 49(9), 52 and 60; Uttar Pradesh Gangster and and Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 - Sections 2, 2(1) and 3; Uttar Pradesh Dacoity Affected Areas Act - Sections 10; Evidence Act, 1872; Terrorist and Disruptive Activities Prevention Act - Sections 20; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 37; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120, 120B, 201, 302, 320, 364 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 161 and 439; Arms Act; Explosives Act; Prevention of Terrorism Rules

Reported in : 2006(1)MPHT222

Advocate for Appellant : Sushil Kumar, ;S.C. Datt, ;H.S. Dubey, ;C.D. Singh, ;Manish Datt, Advs. and ;Vijay Bahadur Singh, Sr. Adv.;P.R. Bhave, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Yadav and ;Anupan Mehrotra, Advs.

1. In this appeal preferred under Section 34 of the Prevention of Terrorism Act, 2002 (for brevity 'the POTA') the defensibility and pregnability of the order dated 29-11-2005 passed by the Special Court under the POTA...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2000

Primo Pick N. Pack Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-2000

Subject : Excise

Acts : Central Excise Rules, 1944 - Rules 11(3), 57, 57A, 57G, 57H and 57H(1); Central Excise Act - Sections 35A; Central Excise and Tariff Act, 1985;

Reported in : 2001(129)ELT296(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : V.K. Tankha and ;Shobit Aditya, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J.1. The petitioner is a Limited Company having its Registered Office at 1346, Napier Town, Jabalpur. It is engaged in manufacturing and marketing of HDPE/PP Woven Sacks/Tapes/Fabrics. It is a medium scale unit having...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2013

Bhagat Singh Jhariya Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-03-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. R.S.Patel, Shri. Ashutosh Dubey, Shri. Ashok Gupta, Shri. A. Usmani, Shri. Kamal Singh Rajput, Shri. Siddharth Datt

M.Cr.C.No 14814/2012 03.04.2013 Shri R.S.Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner. Smt. Pratibha Mishra, Panel Lawyer for the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw this petition with liberty to raise all...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial