Advanced Search Results

E. Merck (India) Limited Vs. V.N. Parulekar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : 1991(2)BomCR201; [1991(63)FLR401]; (1994)IIILLJ546Bom; 1991(1)MhLj540

Advocate for Appellant : K.S. Singhvi and ;Meena Doshi, Advs. in W.P 2973/87 and ;R.S. Kulkarni and ;Abhay Kulkarni, Advs. in WP 972/88

D.R. Dhanuka, J.1. These petitions involve important questions concerning interpretation and application of Section 11A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 2. E. Merck (India) Limited, the petitioner in Writ Petition No. 2973 of 1987 is...

Miraj Taluka Girani Kamgar Sangh Vs. MaraThe Textile Mills

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 119D

Reported in : (2000)IILLJ1641Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Kulkarni, Adv.

Srikrishna, J.1. This appeal is directed against the order of the learned single Judge of this Court dated September 7, 1999 summarily rejecting Writ Petition No. 4712/1999. Thanks to litigious tenacity, there have been several rounds...

Pfizer Limited Vs. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 28; Indian Penal Code (IPC), - Sections 34; Maharashtra Rcognition of Trade Union and Prvention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971

Reported in : 1996VIAD(SC)346; AIR1996SC2618; [1996(74)FLR2198]; JT1996(7)SC239; (1996)IILLJ891SC; 1996(6)SCALE6; (1996)5SCC609; [1996]Supp4SCR716; 1997(1)SLJ39(SC)

Advocate for Appellant : R.F. nariman,; P.H. Parekh and; Sunita Sharma, Advs

ORDERB.N. Kirpal, J.1. These are appeals by special leave from the judgment of the Bombay High Court whereby the petition under Article 227 of the Constitution, filed by respondents 2 and 3 herein, was allowed and...

Prabhat Brass Band Vs. their Workmen

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1), 25F, 25H and 33A; Industrial Disputes (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1956

Reported in : (1959)ILLJ78Bom

Acts/Rules/Orders: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1), 25F, 25H and 33A; Industrial Disputes (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1956AWARD1. This industrial dispute between Prabhat Brass Band, Poona, and the workmen employed under them was...

Krishna Gopal Vaity Vs. M/S. Collins and Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : [1990(60)FLR723]; (1992)ILLJ110Bom

S.P. Kurdukar, J.1. The Petitioner, who was a workman working in the partnership firm of the 1st respondent as a highly skilled workman came to be dismissed by the respondent on January 2, 1975. It must...

Patwardhan Tailors, Poons Vs. their Workmen

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12(5)

Reported in : (1960)ILLJ722Bom

Acts/Rules/Orders: Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Section 12(5)AWARD1. This industrial dispute was referred to me under S. 12(5) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, by Labour and Social Welfare Department order, No. A.J.P. 71(1) 59, dated...

Shri Ramdas G. Patil Vs. General Manager Best Undertaking

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Bombay Industrial Relation Act, 1946 - Sections 42(4), 78, 79 and 84; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : 2000(2)ALLMR414; 2000(3)BomCR152; [2000(86)FLR180]; 2000(2)MhLj129

Advocate for Appellant : Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDERR.J. Kochar, J.1. The petitioner was employed as a conductor under the respondents Undertaking for a period of about seven years. On 29-12-1984 an incident took place in the Bus which he was conducting. It was...

Transport Corporation of India Ltd. and ors. Vs. Maharashtra Rajya Mat ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 62

Reported in : (2002)IIILLJ835Bom

Advocate for Appellant : J.P. Cama and ;Rajesh Gehani, Advs.

Nishita Mhatre, J. 1. These Petitions are directed against the Award of the Industrial Tribunal granting a wage rise to the workmen employed with the Petitioners who are road transporters. The Union representing the workmen employed...

Agricultural Finance Corpn. Employees' Association and Ors. Vs. Agricu ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Practices Act, 1971; Sraff Rule 1969 - Rule 5

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ146Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Kulkarni, Adv.

Pendse, J.1. By this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners are challenging the legality of order dated October 12, 1982 passed by the Industrial Court dismissing 5 the complaint filed...

Rohinton P. Daruwalla Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Labour (Conciliation) ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 12(5)

Reported in : (1994)IIILLJ800Bom

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Kulkarni, Adv.

Dharmadhikari, J.1. This Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner who is an employee of the Respondent No.2 the Indian Hotels Company Limited, Taj Mahal Hotel, Bombay. It is an admitted position that the petitioner was...