Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r s jha · Page 1 of about 2,256 results (0.144 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 15 1995

Shriniwas M. Katti Vs. Rashtriya Chemicals and Fertilizers Limited

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-15-1995

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Food Corporation of India Employees' (Conduct, Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1972 - Rules 5A(1) to 5A(5), 5A(6), 5A(21), 23 and 25; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227

Reported in : (1997)IIILLJ259MP; 1996(0)MPLJ869

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jha, Adv.

ORDERS.K. Dubey, J.1. The two petitions are disposed of by this common order.2. The petitioner in M.P. No. 1653 of 1994 has prayed for quashment of the order dated January 10, 1994 of penalty (Annexure P-15)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1998

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Santosh Kumar Agrawal and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Oct-08-1998

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Rice Procurement (Levy) Order, 1970

Reported in : 1999(1)MPLJ97

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jha, Dy. A.G.

Dipak Misra, J.1. In this appeal preferred under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent the State of Madhya Pradesh and its functionaries have called in question the soundness of judgment passed by a learned Single Judge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2005

Annapurna Malleables Private Limited and anr. Vs. State Bank of India ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2005

Subject : CivilBanking

Acts : Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 19; Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 22(1); Companies Act, 1956; Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 35A; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (SARFAESI); Constitution of India - Article 226; Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Ordinance, 2002

Reported in : 2005(3)MPHT151; 2005(3)MPLJ390

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jha, Sr. Adv. and ;Anshuman Singh, Adv.

ORDERK.K. Lahoti, J.1. The petitioners have sought following reliefs in this petition :--'(a) A writ of and/or in the nature of Mandamus do issue restraining the DRT, Jabalpur (respondent No. 5) from proceeding further with the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 04 2004

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Mahendra Kumar Saraf and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Municipalities Act, 1961 - Sections 24, 24(1), 36, 36(1), 36(4), 41, 45, 47, 47(1), 47(2), 49, 49(1), 55, 323 and 331; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1999 - Sections 47; Madhya Pradesh Municipalities (Amendment) Act, 1997 - Sections 36(1) and 55

Reported in : 2005(4)MPHT185; 2005(3)MPLJ578

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv. General

ORDERS.L. Jain, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 11-2-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 1491/2002, appellant has filed this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.2. A brief resume of the facts...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 2004

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Sushri Manorama Gour

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-04-2004

Subject : ElectionConstitution

Acts : Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 24, 24(1) and 24(2); Municipalities Act - Sections 47, 47(1) and 47(2); Constitution of India - Articles 226, 243O, 243ZA and 243ZG

Reported in : 2005(2)MPHT108; 2005(2)MPLJ323

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Jha, Dy. Adv. General

ORDERS.L. Jain, J.1. Being aggrieved by the order dated 11-2-2003 passed in Writ Petition No. 5461/2002, appellants have filed this Letters Patent Appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent.2. The facts leading to the filing...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 09 2012

Vijay Bahadur Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-09-2012

Subject : Education

1 W.P.No.4198/2011 Vijay Bahadur Singh. versus State of M.P.& ORS.09.07.2012 Shri Surendra Singh learned Senior Counsel with Shri Ashish Tiwari for the petitioner. Shri V.P.Tiwari, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. Heard on the question of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 12 2002

Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-12-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP136

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Sharma, Adv.;R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. ;R.N. Singh, Adv.

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 16 2013

VipIn Kumar Patel Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-16-2013

Subject : Education

W.P.No.13422/2013 Vipin Kumar Patel vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 16.08.2013 Shri Rajendra Tiwari, learned Senior Counsel with Shri T.K.Khadka for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State, on Caveat. Shri Kuldeep...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 07 2013

Smt. Rashmi Gupta Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-07-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Prabhakar Singh

1 W.P.No.13296/2012 Smt. Rashmi Gupta versus State of M.P.& ORS.07.08.2013 Shri Prabhakar Singh learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Swapnil Ganguly, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Rajkumar Shukla Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-31-2013

Subject : Education

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Ajeet Kumar Rawat

W.P.No.1379/2011 Raj Kumar Shukla vs. State of M.P. & ORS.1 31.07.2013 Shri Ajeet Kumar Rawat, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Piyush Jain, learned Panel Lawyer, for the respondent/State. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial