Advanced Search Results

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Kulwant Industries

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)214CTR(P& H)223; [2009]311ITR377(P& H)

M.M. Kumar, J.1. The revenue has approached this Court by challenging order dated 16-12-1997 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amristsar Bench, Amritsar (for brevity 'the Tribunal') in ITA No. 312(ASR)/ 1991 in respect of...

N. Vasantha Kumar Vs. the Regional Transport Officer, Kolar

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 30; Karnataka Motor Vehicles Rules, 1963 - Rule 216

Reported in : AIR1988Kant110; ILR1987KAR3295

Advocate for Appellant : B.R.S. Gupta, Adv.

ORDER1. By consent of learned counsel, this writ petition is treated as having been posted for hearing an. d I have heard them.2. When a motor vehicle's owner, who ceases to reside or has his place...

H.T. Annaji Vs. the District Magistrate and the Deputy Commissioner, H ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989 - Rule 85(6 and 9) and 226; Karnataka Police Act, 1963 - Sections 31(1) and 31-B; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : 1998(4)KarLJ75

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.R.S. Gupta, Adv.

ORDER1. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the decision arrived at on 8-3-1995 at the meeting of Divisional Controller, Hassan District, Hassan, District Superintendent of Police, Hassan, Divisional Traffic Officer, Hassan Division, Hassan in presence...

Venkataramana Reddy Vs. Regional Transport Authority

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 72

Reported in : ILR1995KAR287; 1995(5)KarLJ80

Advocate for Appellant : B.R.S. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J 1. In these two Writ Petitions, the petitioners have felt aggrieved by the Conditions to the following effect:'1. A vehicle of not more than 10 years old having seating capacity of not...

Neelakanteshwara Motor Service Vs. Karnataka State Appellate Tribunal ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 57(8) and 68(FF); Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 1986

Advocate for Appellant : B.R.S. Gupta, Adv.

ORDERHari Nath Tilhari, J. 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner has sought the quashing of the order passed by respondent No. 1 i.e., Karnataka State Appellate Tribunal in Appeal...

R. Maheshwari and Others Vs. Karnataka State Transport Authority, Bang ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2(31), 58(2), 69, 70, 72, 75, 80(3), 81, 82, 83, 87, 90, 104 and 217; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 47(3)

Reported in : II(2001)ACC608; 2001(3)KarLJ212

Advocate for Appellant : Sri B.R.S. Gupta and ;Sri S.Prakash, Advs.

ORDERW.P. Nos. 43544 and 43601 to 43603 of 19991. Facts: The petitioner has a permit bearing No. 33/64 authorising the petitioner to operate on the route Tirupathi to Bangalore and back performing one round trip per...

D.N. Venkatesh Reddy Vs. the Chief Engineer, B.W.S.S.B. and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 21

Reported in : AIR2004Kant494

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Gupta, Adv. for ;H.N. Nagamohandas, Adv.

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. Petitioner who claims to be the owner of a commercial building at No. 10, Domlur Village, Airport Main Road, Bangalore, has approached this Court praying for relief against the respondent Nos. 1...

Vishwanath Dnyanoba Kirade Vs. Nav Akanksha Mahila Mandal and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

Oral Judgment: 1. Heard the learned Advocates for the respective parties at length. 2. Rule. By consent, Rule is made returnable forthwith and heard finally. 3. The issue that has been raised for the consideration of...

L.R. Bairwa Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Rajasthan Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1996 - Rules 12, 12(2), 13, 13(3), 25 and 25(2); Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : RLW2006(2)Raj1664; 2005(3)WLC30

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Mishra, Adv.;S.B. Mathur; and Sanjay Srivastava, Advs.

S.N. Jha, C.J.1. By this writ petition the petitioner who is a retired District & Sessions Judge of the Rajasthan Higher Judicial Service seeks quashing of the orders dated 3.8.2002 and 16.1.2003 refusing his request to...

State (Nct of Delhi) vs Harish & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, Mr. Lalit Luthra, Mr. R. S. Gupta

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 25th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 7th April, 2026 Uploaded on: 7th April, 2026 + CRL.A. 943/2016 STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ritesh Kumar...