Advanced Search Results

Sardar Surjeetsingh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Act, 1956 - Sections 53, 53(1) and 53(2); Nanded Sikh Gurudwara Sachkhand Shri Hazur Apchalnagar Sahib Rules, 1958 - Rule 3; Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 86B; Punjab Panchayat Samities and Zilla Parishads Non-official Members (Payment of Allowances) Rules, 1965 - Rules 3 to 7; Constitution of India - Articles 102, 158, 158(2), 191, 191(1), 361 and 361(4)

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR382; 2006(2)BomCR704; 2006(1)MhLj538

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Deshmukh, Adv.

R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.1. Heard.2. Perused the records.3. The petitioners challenge the notifications dated 16-1-2003 and 21-10-2004 issued by the respondent No. 1 to the extent it appointed the respondent No. 4 either as the Member or...

Prof. Manohar Dhonde and Indian Bahujan Teachers Association (ibta), M ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 41D and 41D(1); Maharashtra Educational Institutions (Management) Act, 1976; Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulations Act, 1977; Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994; M.E.P.S. (Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981 - Rules 23, 28(5), 31, 33, 36, 37 and 143; Maharashtra State Commission for Women Act, 1993 - Sections 6, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 9(3), 10, 10(1) and 13; Evidence Act - Sections 132; Protection of Human Rights Act, 1993; Representation of People Act - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15, 17, 19(1), 21, 23, 24, 31(1), 32, 173 and 226; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 354 376, 504, 506 and 509; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 156(3), 202 and 357; Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Secti

Reported in : 2007(2)ALLMR717; 2007(1)BomCR417

Advocate for Appellant : B.L.Sagar Killarikar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 282 of 2004 and ;B.L.Sagar Killarikar, Adv. in Writ Petition No. 4170 of 2004

N.V. Dabholkar, J.1. The two Writ Petitions are pertaining to a common subject, which can be described as 'grievance relating to sexual harassment meted out to some lady teachers working in a private school.' Writ Petition...

Baby Saroja Udyachandji Patani Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1999(4)BomCR197

Advocate for Appellant : Pradeep Deshmukh for ;S.R. Karnwar, Adv.

ORDERA.D. Mane, J.1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith on the request of the learned Counsel for the parties.2. Shri R.S. Deshmukh, learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives notice for the respondents No. 1, 2 and 3...

Firoza Fazal Shaikh Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. S. Deshmukh

Oral Judgment: 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel for parties. 2. By this application, Applicant / original Accused challenges the order dated 25th February, 2016 passed by...

The State of Maharashtra and Another Vs. Naresh Rajeshwarrao Patil and ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Criminal

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. Kedar

Oral Judgment: Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of all parties. 1. These two applications can be disposed of by this common order, since both are questioning the correctness of the order,...

Sayyad Yousuf and Another Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through the Se ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable and heard forthwith with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Writ Petition No.6794/2012 is filed against the judgment and order dated 4th of August, 2012, passed...

Sou. Sulbha Vijay Pathak and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Reported in : AIR1998Bom225; 1998(3)ALLMR839; 1998(1)BomCR453; 1998(1)MhLj275

Advocate for Appellant : S.A. Kulkarni and ;P.G. Deshmukh, Advs.

ORDERB.H. Marlapalle, J.1. The W.P. No. 4248/96 has been filed by SonamataShikshan Prasarak Sanstha challenging the approval for running school by therespondent No. 5 Society by name Jai Maharashtra Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha inCidco, Aurangabad, whereas the...

Raghunath S/O Ujvya Chauhan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 391, 395, 412 and 427; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 8, 9, 27, 59 and 114; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 161, 165, 228, 235(2) and 428

Reported in : 1998(5)BomCR162

Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. M.A.Kulkarni, Adv.

ORDERR.G. Deshpande, J.1. Appellant/accused Raghunath is convicted and sentenced under section 235(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Beed, by his judgment and order, dated 14-7-1995 for the offences punishable under...

Dr. Percy S/O. Savakshaw Jilla Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

B.P. Dharmadhikari, J. Heard Adv. Mr. R.S. Deshmukh, for the petitioner; learned Addl. G.P. Mr. K.B. Chaudhary, for respondent nos.1 to 4, and Adv. Mr. N.B. Khandare, for respondent nos.5 and 6. 2. Upon instructions, Adv....

Manoj Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Education

1. The applicant is the husband of the non-applicant no.2 herein. He is facing prosecution vide Regular Criminal Case No. 154 of 2011, pending before the Judicial Magistrate (First Class), Sakri [District : Dhule]. The said...