Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r s chahar · Page 1 of about 32 results (0.046 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 25 2005

Pgi Employees Union Vs. Director, Post Graduate Institute of Medical E ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Apr-25-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 22, 31 and 32; PG Institute of Medical Education and Research Act, 1966; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 - Sections 16(1); PGI (Amendment) Regulations, 1970

Reported in : (2005)IIILLJ628P& H

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Chahar, Adv.

ORDERM.M. Kumar, J.1. This order shall dispose of C.W.P.Nos. 2267 and 2289 of 1988. Both the petitions are directed against the award dated August 7, 1987 (Annexure P.1) passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Chandigarh. The first...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 1992

Ram Sarup Alias Sarup Chand Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-14-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 17, 37 and 50; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439

Reported in : 1993CriLJ2567

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Chahar, Adv.

A.S. Nehra, J.1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439, Code of Criminal Procedure, for grant of bail during the pendency of the trial on First Information Report No. 130 dated 15-4-1992...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 23 2008

Bantu Vs. the State of U.P.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-23-2008

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1983; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 313 and 366; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 364, 375, 376, 376A, 376B, 376C and 376D; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 235(2) and 354(3); Constitution of India - Articles 19 and 21

Reported in : JT2008(8)SC136; (2008)11SCC113; 2008AIRSCW6401; 2008(3)Crimes264

Advocate for Appellant : Shankar Divate (A.C.), Adv

Arijit Pasayat, J. 1. Death sentence awarded by learned Special Judge EC Act/Additional Sessions Judge, Agra in Sessions Trial No. 83 of 2004 having been confirmed by the Allahabad High Court in appeal and in the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 22 1999

Krishan Kumar Singla Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Jul-22-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India, Articles 226 and 243R; Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 - Sections 9(3)(1); Haryana Municipal (Amendment) Act, 1996

Reported in : (1999)123PLR150

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mittal, Adv.; Vinod Kumar Gupta, Adv. in C.W.P. No. 6404 of 1997 and;

Swatanter Kumar, J. 1. Civil Writ Petition No. 6404 of 1997 was admitted and ordered to be placed before the Hon'ble Single Judge vide order of Hon'ble Division Bench dated 10.7.1997. While Civil Writ Petition No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 08 1996

U.T. Limited Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-08-1996

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 66 and 76

Reported in : (1997)116PLR401

Advocate for Appellant : Ashok Sharma Nabhewale, Adv.

R.L. Anand, J.1. M/s. U.T. Limited carrying on business at village Jhermairi Barotiwala, District Solan has filed the present civil writ petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India against the State of Haryana, Transport...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 17 2013

Present : Mr.U.K.Agnihotri Advocate for Vs. Gaje Singh and Others .... ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-17-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.16416 of 1990 Date of Decision : September 17, 2013 Gaje Singh and others ......Petitioners versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 2002

Smt. Sunita JaIn and ors. Vs. Mittar SaIn JaIn and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Oct-09-2002

Subject : Civil

Acts : Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 - Sections 9(1)

Reported in : (2003)133PLR641

Advocate for Appellant : Kamal Sharma, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J.1. This revision petition filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for brevity, 'the Code') challenges the order dated 21.12.1992 dismissing the objections of the petitioner with regard to territorial...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 20 2014

Mr.Babbar Bhan Advocate for Vs. the State of Punjab and Others.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

Hemlata IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH201403.10 11:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document C.W.P.No.3755 of 1992(O&M) Date of decision: 20.02.2014 Charanjiv Singh Virdi ...Petitioner versus The State of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 1990

K.K. Mittal and Co. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-04-1990

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 44AC, 44AC(1) and 206C

Reported in : (1990)90CTR(P& H)50; [1991]187ITR208(P& H); (1990)98PLR312

Advocate for Appellant : Mohan Jain, Adv.

Amarjeet Chaudhary, J.1. This order will also dispose of Civil Writ Petition No. 8337 of 1989, in which the petitioners have taken an additional ground that no deduction of tax at source can be made from...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 25 1999

Dr. Harsh Vardhan and ors. Vs. Haryana Urban Development Authority and ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : May-25-1999

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Haryana Urban Development Authority Act, 1977 - Sections 2, 13 and 18; Haryana Urban Development Authority (Eviction of Buildings) Regulations, 1979

Reported in : (2000)125PLR295

Advocate for Appellant : R.S. Mittal and; Sudhir Mittal, Advs.; Jaswant Singh

G.S. Singhvi, J.1. Whether the writ jurisdiction of the High Court deserves to be exercised for restraining the State and its agencies from enforcing the provisions of law under which they are empowered to remove encroachments...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial