Advanced Search Results
S. Balasubramaninan Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Apr-19-2012
Criminal
Industrial Disputes Act - Section 29; Code of Criminal Procedure(CrPC) - Section 482, 377, 401(1), 386, 397, 561-A, 378, 438(1), 399(3); Code of Civil Procedure(CPC) - Section 151 ; Principal Act - 25-A, 54-A, 291-A, 311-A, 378; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973 - Section 20
Mr.B. Kumar, Adv
Revisions filed under Sec.397 r/w Sec.401 Cr.P.C against the judgment dated 6.2.2008 in R.C.No.34 of 2005 and Appeal No.289 of 2003 passed by the learned Additional District & Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court-I), Chennai confirming the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGanesan.J, H.C.1717 vs the Inspector General of Police
Chennai
Jan-06-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.01.2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR W.P.(MD)No.17640 of 2021 J.Ganesan ...Petitioner Vs1. The Inspector General of Police, Railways, Chennai.2. The Superintendent of Police, Railways, Crawford, Thiruchirapalli. ...RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShri Ashwni Kumar Khanna Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Delhi
Feb-06-2003
Property
Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1); Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of India
2003IIIAD(Delhi)634; 105(2003)DLT98; 2003(69)DRJ628
R.K. Anand, Sr. Adv. and; Shalini Gandharva, Adv
Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J.1. A sub-lease deed was executed in respect of plot No. E-5/8, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi in favor of Smt. Kalan on 19.07.1972. The property was sold on a Power of Attorney basis...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
B.Thatchinamoorthi Vs State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, A ...
Chennai
Apr-01-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 01.04.2026CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Crl.O.P.(MD) No.6408 of 2026 B.Thatchinamoorthi, S/o.Packiyam, ... Petitioner/sole Accused Vs The State rep. by the Inspector of Police, Abiramam Police Station, Ramanathapuram District....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRamesh Kannan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Chennai
Jan-23-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 23.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN AND THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R. POORNIMA CRL.MP(MD) No.8931 of 2025 in Crl.A(MD)No.460 of 2025 Ramesh Kannan ....... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Askindore Wire Company Ltd. Vs. Cce
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Mar-12-2004
Excise
(2004)(94)ECC518
1. We have examined the records of the case. The question arising in this case is whether M.S. (Mild Steel) Galvanised Wires manufactured and cleared by the appellants during 1981-82 and 82-83 were classifiable under Tariff...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Mouli Reddy Vs. Member Secretary, Apseb, Vidyut Soudha, Hyd. a ...
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-1998
Contract
Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10(1)
1998(2)ALD815; 1998(2)ALT484
Mr. G. Vidyasagar, Adv.
ORDER1. Rule nisi, Mr. R Ramanujam, learned Standing Counsel for APSE Board, took notice for the respondents. The facts and the question of law which do arise for consideration and resolution are the same in both...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTci Finance Ltd. Vs. State of A.P. and anr.
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-25-2004
BankingCriminal
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138
2004(1)ALD(Cri)979; II(2005)BC8; [2005]124CompCas28(AP); 2004CriLJ3163
S. Niranjan Reddy, Adv.
ORDERG. Yethirajulu, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the complainant in C. C. No. 783 of 1995 on the file of the XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad taken on file for the offence under Section 138 of...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChandra Mouli Reddy Vs. Member-secretary, Apseb
Andhra Pradesh
Mar-18-1999
Labour and Industrial
Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 - Sections 10
(1999)IILLJ1350AP
G. Vidyasagar, Adv.
ORDERS.R. Nayak, J. 1. Rule nisi, Mr. R. Ramanujam, learned Standing Counsel for APSE Board, took notice for the respondents. The facts and the question of law which do arise for consideration and resolution are the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.N. Shervani and anr. Vs. Lt. Governor and ors.
Delhi
May-19-1989
Commercial
Delhi Police Act, 1978 - Sections 2, 2(1), 28, 28(3), 30 and 146; Sarais Act, 1867; Police Regulations, 1980
38(1989)DLT357; 1989RLR296
S. Pappu,; B.B. Sawhney,; Anjali Chopra,;
S.B. Wad, J.(1) These Writ Petitions challenge the validity of the Regulations issued by the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, under Delhi Police Act to regulate Guest Houses through licensing. The petitioners are mostly owners of the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›
- Last »