Advanced Search Results

Smt. P.M Singh Vs. Cbi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Uday U. Lalit, Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Ms. Smriti Sinha, Mr. Shri Singh, Mr. Suksham Chauhan, Ms. Akansha Singh, Mr. Nitin Saluja, Ms. Vasundhara Nagrath, Mr. R.V.Sinha, Mr. A.S.Singh, Dr. Harish U, Mr. Alok Bachawat

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl.M.B.1584/2013 in CRL.A. 986/2013 Date of Decision:24. h September, 2013 SMT. P.M SINGH Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Uday U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. with Mr....

Cce Vs. Technologicals Institute

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1999)(85)LC886Tri(Delhi)

1. The issue involved in this appeal filed by Revenue is whether capital goods credit under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules is available in respect of winding wires of copper used for rewinding the...

Akanman Bora (In Jail) Vs. State of Assam

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

S. Haque J. 1. The Appellant Akanman Bora appeals from Jail against the judgment and order of conviction dated 16-6-1983 under Section 302, I.P.C. in Sessions Case No. 72(NL) of 1981 of the Court of Shri...

Paragon Cable Corpn. and anr. Vs. Cce

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (1997)(72)LC661Tri(Delhi)

1. These are two appeals involving a common issue for determination and as such these are clubbed together in this common order.2. The facts, in brief, are that the appellants are engaged in the manufacture of...

Brytex Auto Industries (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1999)(107)ELT794TriDel

1. This is an Appeal against the finding of the Collector of Central Excise (Appeal) holding that the appellants were not entitled to 10% more than what has already been paid as duty by their New...

Shri Vinod Kumar Bhatia Vs. C.C.E., New Delhi

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

1. The brief facts in this case are that M/s. Brite Enterprises, New Delhi filed 5 shipping bills for export of 51 packages of Cotton P/L Denim pants totally valued at Rs.18.49 lakhs claiming draw-back of...

Commissioner of Central Excise, Vs. M/S. I.B.P. Company Limited

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2001)(76)ECC715

1. This is a petition for decision whether the benefit of Notf.No191/87-CE dt.4.7.87 shall be available to a unit manufacturing explosive used in another unit which is engaged in mining copper ore.2. The facts of the...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Vintron Electronics P. Ltd.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Excise

Reported in : (2005)(182)ELT218TriDel

1. The Revenue has challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that it was wrongly held by him that the delivery note containing all the particulars is necessarily an invoice issued under Rule...

Laxmidhar Nayak and 3 ors. (In Jail Custody) Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : FamilyCriminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302, 304B and 498A

Reported in : 82(1996)CLT142; II(1996)DMC249; 1996(II)OLR55

Advocate for Appellant : Brahmananda Panda, Adv.

C.R. Pal, J.1. Learned Counsel for the petitioners states that the defect has already been removed.2. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner's and Mr. B.K. Das, learned Addl. Standing Counsel.3. The petitioners in G.R. Case No....

Mrs. Monika Acharya Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : CriminalFood Adulteration

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 389 and 424; Prevention of Food Adulteration Act - Sections 16(1)

Reported in : 2000(I)OLR299

Advocate for Appellant : B.P. Ray, ;S. Pujari and P.K. Patnaik

ORDERC.R. Pal, J.1. Heard Shri B. P. Ray, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri S.K. Nayak, the learned Addl. Standing Counsel for the State.2. This is a petition Under Section 389(2), Cr.P.C. filed by...