Advanced Search Results

Rajendra Prasad Mathur ors. Vs. Karnataka University and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Karnataka Universities Act, 1976 - Sections 12(5)

Reported in : AIR1986SC1448; 1986(1)SCALE981; 1986Supp(1)SCC740; [1986]2SCR912; 1986(2)LC639(SC); 1986SuppSCC740

Advocate for Appellant : Dalveer Bhandari, Adv

P.N. Bhagwati, C.J.1. These appeals by special leave are directed against an Order passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court summarily rejecting writ appeals preferred by several students against a common judgment delivered...

Tarseen Chand Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 304A

Reported in : I(1985)ACC319; 1985(1)Crimes948; 27(1985)DLT319; 1985(8)DRJ216

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Mathur and; H.C. Gulati, Advs

Malik Sharief-Ud-Din, J.(1) The petitioner was given notice of the offence under Section 304-A Indian Penal Code by Mr. A.S. Dateer, Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, and the grievance of the petitioner is that on the facts of...

Geep Industrial Syndicate Vs. Collector of Central Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1994)LC244Tri(Delhi)

1. This matter has come to the Tribunal as a result of Supreme Court's directions dated 13-11-1992 in Civil Appeal Nos. 2508-2509 of 1978.Relevant extracts from the same are reproduced below :- "The question before us...

Narayan Chandra Mukherjee and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and anr.

Court : Patna

Subject : Criminal

Anil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Both these applications were heard together as both the cases arise out of the common facts and common relief, inasmuch as, in both the cases, it has been prayed that the entire...

Raghunath Swarup Mathur and ors. Vs. Har Swarup Mathur and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 237, 257, 397, 398, 398(1), 402 and 406

Reported in : [1970]40CompCas282(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.S. Bhatnagar, Adv.

M.H. Beg, J. 1. Raghunath Swarup Mathur and his four sons are the petitioners before this court under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The petitioners fulfil...

Abdul Razzaq Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 299 and 300

Reported in : AIR1960All567; 1960CriLJ1179

Advocate for Appellant : Hasim Ahmad and ;Shamsuddin Ahmad, Advs.

S.K. Verma, J.1. Abdul Razzak has filed this appeal against the judgment of the learned Sessions Judge of Allahabad, convicting him under Sections 323 and 325, 'each read with Section 34 I. P. C. and sentencing...

Assistant Collector of Customs Vs. Shanti Lal Laxmi Chand Modi and ors ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 196A, 342 and 367; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 133

Reported in : ILR1971Delhi584B

Advocate for Appellant : V.D. Mahajan,; H.L. Anand and; Girdhar Govind, Advs

M.R.A. Ansari, J. (1) The Assistant Collector of Customs, New 'Delhi, filed a complaint in the Court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi, against the following seven persons under section 120-B, Indian Penal Code read...

Prime Channel Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1997Delhi18; 1996(38)DRJ106

Advocate for Appellant : P.P. Rao,; Gopal Subramaniam,; K.K. Laoria,;

Dalveer Bhandari, J. (1) This appeal has been preferred against the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 19.4.1996 passed in Writ petition No. 1319/96. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are...

Indian Oil Corporation Vs. Indira Sood

Court : Delhi

Subject : ContractArbitration

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 3

Reported in : 1994IVAD(Delhi)1065; 1995(1)ARBLR102(Delhi); 56(1994)DLT590; 1994(31)DRJ680

Advocate for Appellant : P.K. Jaitely and ; Rakesh Luthra, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Lpg distribution ship was awarded to Mrs. Indira Sood, sole proprietor of M/s Vikas Gas Agency (In short the 'Agency') under the Dgr Scheme for the rehabilitation of war effected widows of the...

Om Prakash Purohit Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Acts : Central Public Works Department Manual Act - Sections 8; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 47, Rule 5; Rajasthan High Court Rules, 1952 - Rule 64; Constitution of India - Article 226 and 227

Reported in : 2001(1)WLC462; 2001(1)WLN178

Advocate for Appellant : Om Prakash, Adv.

ORDERBalia, J.1. Appellant in this appeal is an Engineer employed in the Central Public Works Department. While he was working as Superintending Engineer, Jodhpur Central Circle, CPWD, Jodhpur, the appellant was ordered to be transferred as...