Advanced Search Results

Rai Satya Vrata Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax and Commissioner of Inc ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Special Marriage Act

Reported in : (1982)29CTR(All)269; [1983]141ITR634(All); [1982]10TAXMAN316(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goel, Adv.

Rastogi, J. 1. These two references may be taken up together. Both of them have been made at the instance of the assessee, Sri Rai Satya Vrata, a Hindu undivided family. W.T.R. No. 143 of 1978...

Mohan Wahi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 220 and 264; Constitution of India - Article 226; Income Tax Rules - Rule 68B

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(All)72; [2000]246ITR144(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Arjun Singhal and ;R.P. Goel, Advs.

M.C. Agarwal, J.1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner challenges an order passed by the Tax Recovery Officer confirming an auction sale of house property No. D-53/91-D situate at...

Firm Shri Veer Glass Works Vs. Firm Sonpal Vidya Charan Glass Bangles ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rules 5(1) and 6(2)

Reported in : AIR1986All2

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goel, Adv.

ORDERB.D. Agrawal, J. 1. The short question raised in this petition is whether in a case where this Court has in the exercise of appellate jurisdiction declined to grant stay of execution in exercise of powers...

In Re: U.P. Cement Corporation Ltd. (In Liquidation)

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 443, 446, 457, 457(1), 466, 643(1) and 643(2); Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 - Sections 20 and 20(1); Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 272 to 274

Reported in : [2002]112CompCas562(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Goel and ;Ashok Mehta, Advs.

ORDERSunh Ambwani, J. 1. U.P. State Cement Corporation Ltd. (UPSCCL) was declared as a Sick Industrial Company by Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR) on 7-10-1992, and IDBI was appointed as the Operating Agency. Cemtech...

State Vs. Mahmood Butt and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ881

ORDERP.N. Bakshi, J.1. This is a revision filed by Sri B. N. Katju, the Public Prosecutor against the order of the I Civil and Sessions Judge. Allahabad dated 13.3.1972 rejecting his application for withdrawal of criminal...

Anand NaraIn Singh Vs. U.P. Secondary Education Service, Selection Boa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards Act, 1982 - Sections 2(1), 9, 10, 16, 18, 32 and 33C; Uttar Pradesh Public Service (Reservation for Schedule Caste, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1974; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards (Amendment) Act, 1993; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards (Amendment) Act, 1995; Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921; Uttar Pradesh Secondary Education Service Commission and Selection Boards Rules, 1998 - Rules 11(2), 12, 12(5); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 348(3)

Reported in : (2001)2UPLBEC959

Advocate for Appellant : R.G. Padia and ;Prakash Padia, Advs.

Yatindra Singh, J.1. These writ petitions (detailed in Appendix-9 of this judgment) challenge selection of Heade of private High School (10th Class) and Intermediate Colleges (12th Class) (referred to as institutions in this judgment). These selections...

Life Insurance Corporation of India Through Its Chairman and the Senio ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(2)AWC1399; [2008(116)FLR1031]

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. BN Singh, Sri. Singh

Amitava Lala, J.1. Both the aforesaid appeals are arising out of an order passed by the learned Single Judge on 13th April, 2001 in Civil Misc. Writ Petition No. 19951 of 2000 (Kailash Nath and Ors....

Mahendra Pratap Singh (Deceased) and Another Vs. Smt. Padam Kumari Dev ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Property

Acts : Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 183; Power of Attorney Act, 1882 - Sections 2; Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 35; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 77 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order X, Rules 2 and 4 - Order 26, Rules 7, 13 and 20 - Order 32, Rules 1 to 14, 15, 16 and 21 - Order 32A, Rules 1, 2 and 3; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 109 and 165

Reported in : AIR1993All143

Advocate for Appellant : A.K. Sharma, ;P.M. Gupta and ;K.S. Chauhan, Advs.

1. A very ugly situation faces the Court, the High Court, in its original jurisdiction in these cases. Many questions have been flung at the Court. The Court must answer them as they are all questions...

Umesh Chand Bhilwar Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976 - Sections 30; Prathma Bank (Staff) Service Regulations, 1980 - Regulations 8, 8(1), (2) and (3), 9 and 10, 10(2), 17(1) and 30; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 23 and 29; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Rules 5 and 6; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Sugar Factories Federation Service Rules, 1976; Indian Police Service (Probation) Rules, 1954

Reported in : 1999(2)AWC943; (1999)IILLJ1093All; (1999)1UPLBEC27

Advocate for Appellant : Rajendra Prasad Singh, ;S.C. Budhwar and ;R.M. Suggi, Advs.

G.P. Mathur, J. on behalf of D. P. Mohapatra, C.J. also. 1. The petitioner, a Probationary Officer tn a Bank, has challenged the order by which his services were terminated. There was a difference of opinion...

Varsha Plastics (P) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2006)99TTJ(Mum.)487

1. This appeal has been filed by the assessee against the order dt. 2nd Jan., 2001, of CIT(A)-XLVI, Mumbai. The assessee has raised three grounds of appeal, which are as under : (i) The learned CIT(A)...