Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r p bansal · Page 1 of about 161 results (0.118 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 07 2005

Shiv Mandir Jeernodhan Sanathan Sabha (Regd.) Through Its General Secr ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-07-2005

Subject : Civil

Acts : Delhi Development Act - Sections 11A, 11A(2), 11A(3) and 44; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 119(2005)DLT444

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Lalit Bhardwaj, Adv

S. Ravindra Bhat, J.1. Issue Rule. With consent of parties, the matter was finally heard.2. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenges an action of the Delhi Development Authority, (DDA), by its letter dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

Kalu Ram and Co. (Huf) and Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 171(3), 184 and 185

Reported in : [2002]254ITR307(Delhi); [2001]115TAXMAN499(Delhi)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Bharati Pawar, Adv

D. K. Jain J. 1. On being moved by the assessed under Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench-A (in short 'the Tribunal'), has referred the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2001

Sh. Roop Kumar Vs. Mohan thedani and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-19-2001

Subject : Property

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 145; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 30, 32 and 33 - Order 41; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 182; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 105 and 107; Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 16(2); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 and 92

Reported in : 2001IIAD(Delhi)153; 90(2001)DLT427; 2001(57)DRJ709

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Pradeep Nandrajog, Adv

ORDERA.K. Sikri, J.1. This Regular First Appeal is filed by the appellant, who was defendant in the suit, against judgment and decree dated 19th December, 1996 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi in Suit...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 09 1967

Bal Diwakar Hans Vs. Delhi Administration and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-1967

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3

Reported in : 3(1967)DLT172

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal and; K.L. Sharma, Advs

Hardy, J. (1) The petitioner Bal Diwakar Hans was arrested on 2nd December, 1966, pursuant to an order of detention made by the District Magistrate, Delhi, on 30th November, 1966, under Section 3 (i) (a) (ii)...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 1978

Mohan Lal Indoria Vs. Babu Ram Solanki

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-06-1978

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 81

Reported in : 14(1978)DLT12

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal,; D.D. Chawla and ; C.L. Choudhry, Advs

S.S. Chadha, J. (1) The only question which arises for decision in this election petition under Section 81 of the Representation of the People. Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) calling in question theelection...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 06 1993

Naresh Kumar Gupta Vs. Nav Bharat Times Co-operative Group Housing Soc ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-06-1993

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 29, Rule 2; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 14

Reported in : 53(1994)DLT642; 1994(28)DRJ56

Advocate for Appellant : S.K. Mittal,; Sharad Aggarwal,; R.P. Bansal,;

Mohd. Shamim, J. (1) Learned counsel for the petitioner has raised a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the present objections preferred by the respondent against the award dated May 23, 1990 rendered by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1995

Hem Raj Arya and ors. Vs. Election Commission, Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-01-1995

Subject : Election

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1995(32)DRJ231

Advocate for Appellant : V.P. Chaudhary,; Rajan Sareen,; R.P. Bansal,;

D.K. Jain, J.(1) Rule D.B. (2) Since in this matter a very short question is involved and we have heard counsel for the parties at length, we propose to dispose of the writ petition at this...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2001

Municipal Corporation of Delhi Vs. Surender Deo Gaur and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-2001

Subject : CivilProperty

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 7; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 94(2001)DLT714; 2002(61)DRJ15

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Sunil Goel, Adv

ORDERSanjay Kishan Kaul, J. 1. A suit was filed by respondent No.1 against the appellant and respondents 2 to 5 for possession and for recovery of mesne profits/interest or in the alternative for recovery of Rs.77,99,417.40p....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2000

Rita Kishor and ors. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2000

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151

Reported in : AIR2000Delhi417

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and; Mr. Sharad K.Aggarwal, Adv

ORDERMukul Mudgal, J.1. This is an application on behalf of the plaintiff under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code seeking interim reliefs from the defendant-DDA. 2. The plaintiffs have filed the suit for compensation and...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2001

Hanuman Prasad Sharma and ors. Vs. M.C.D. and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-03-2001

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 348; Constitution of India- Article 226

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT853; 2002(61)DRJ252

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Bansal, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Adv

Manmohan Sarin, J.(1) Rule.2. With the consent of the parties, writ petition is taken up for disposal.3. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a writ for quashing the order No. D/6/ZE/DB/CY/2001 dated 11.9.2001, passed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial