Advanced Search Results

Shyam Biri Works (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2003]131TAXMAN253(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, for the Assessee A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue

Heard Sri R.P. Agrawal, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri A.N. Mahajan for the department.2. This appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act has been filed against the impugned order of the Income...

Manohar Singh Marwaha Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Pashu (Niyantran) Adhiniyam, 1976 - Sections 4 and 6

Reported in : AIR2003MP136

Advocate for Appellant : Manoj Sharma, Adv.;R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. ;R.N. Singh, Adv.

Uma Nath Singh, J. 1. The petitioners, owners of Dairy farms in the Gwarighat area of Jabalpur have called in question the validity of the notification dt. 19-3-1999 issued by the Municipal Corporation, Jabalpur in excercise...

Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors. Vs. Gulabchandra Agrawal

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Life Insurance Corporation of India (Agents) Regulations, 1972 - Regulations 4, 16 and 19(1)

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT139; 2004(4)MPLJ91

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ; Sanjay Agrawal, Adv.

Shantanu Kemkar, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, the appellants/defendants have called in question the judgment and decree dated 18-7-1995 passed by the III Additional District Judge, Satna in...

Sharique Ali and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 3(1), 8, 14, 15, 16, 16(1), 19(1), 21, 26(1), 30(1) and (2), 35, 39, 39A, 41, 45, 46, 51A, 213, 226, 226(1), 254, 309, 311, 337 and 371E; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya), 2000 - Sections 4, 5 and 6; University Grant Commission Act, 1956; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) Adhiniyam, 1978 - Sections 2, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Adhyapakon Tatha Anya Karmachariyon Ke Vetano Ka Sandaya) (Amendment) Act, 2000 - Sections 7; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115; Society Registrikaran Act; Madhya Pradesh Viswa Vidyalaya Adhiniyam 1973; Madhya Pradesh Ashaskiya Shikshan Sanstha (Institu

Reported in : 2002(1)MPHT315

Advocate for Appellant : N.S. Kale, ;Ravindra Shrivastava, ;R.P. Agrawal, ;R.N. Singh, ;N.C. Jain, ;Rajendra Tiwari, ;V.S. Dabir and ;S.L. Saxena, Sr. Advs., ;Sanjay Agrawal, Rohit Arya, ;Kishore Shrivastava, ;M. Bhatti, ;M

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. The centrum, issue that we are obligated to advert to in this batch of writ petitions, which are inseggregable and inseverable, is 'education' that makes a man a complete human being in...

Brij Bhal Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 198; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2000MP265

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, ;Ravindra Shrivastava and ;Sanjay Agrawal, Advs.

ORDERDipak Misra, J. 1. In both these writ petitions challenge being to the award of licences in favour of respondent No. 10; one pertaining to tea, coffee, sweets, namkeen and fruit stall and the other for...

Sanjay Mishra and anr. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 302, 323, 342, 364, 431 and 506B; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 27; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 164, 227, 228 and 401

Reported in : 2003(3)MPHT409

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Parag Chaturvedi, Adv.

ORDERShantanu Kemkar, J. 1. Through this revision petition under Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicants have challenged the order dated 17-7-1995 passed by IIIrd Additional Sessions Judge, Satna in Criminal Case...

G.S. Associate Vs. Kamlendra Singh and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2004(4)MPHT275; 2004(3)MPLJ286

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ; S.K. Agrawal, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. The spinal issue that has spiralled to this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is whether the Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (for short 'BSNL') had acted in conformity with the...

Zila Sahakari Krishi Aur GramIn Vikas Bank Mydt. and ors. Vs. Phool Si ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 - Sections 48C, 49(8), 53, 53(1), 53(3), 53B, 53(4), 53(13) and 55(2),57A, 58, 64 and 66; Madhya Pradesh Sahakari Krishi Aur Gramin Vikas Bank Karmchari Seva (Niyojan, Nibandhan Tatha Unki Karya Sthiti) Niyam, 1983 - Rule 71(1); Constitution of India - Article 235

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT266

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Adv. and ;Sanjay K. Agrawal, Adv.

Dipak Misra, J.1. The factual matrix, the substratum of the scenario, the edifice built, the fulcrum of grounds urged, the gravamen of canvassment and the bone of proponement being same the present batch of appeals preferred...

Mukul Vs. State Bank of India and 2 ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : State Bank of India (Supervisory Staff) Service Rules - Rule 50(2) aNd 50(5); Constitution of India - Articles 136 and 226

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT216

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agrawal, Adv.

ORDERC.K. Prasad, J. 1. By this Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner prays for quashing of the order dated 1st June, 1983 (Annexure-P/14), passed by the disciplinary authority, whereby, as...

Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 3, 19(1), 265, 277, 278, 286 and 372; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax Act, 1994 - Sections 4 and 9; Madhya Pradesh Commercial Tax (Amendment) Act, 1995; Madhya Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000 - Sections 2, 3, 75, 76,77, 78,79, 80, 81, 83, 85, 113, 119 and 120; Madhya Pradesh Deferment of Tax Rules, 1986; Madhya Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1958 - Sections 12 and 22D; Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 8(5) and 13; State Re-organisation Act, 1956 - Sections 15; Punjab New Capital (Periphery) Act, 1952; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act, 1950; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 89; Adaptation of Laws Order, 2002; Chhattisgarh Vanijyik Kar Adhiniyam

Reported in : [2004]137STC269(MP)

Advocate for Appellant : A.M. Mathur and ;R.P. Agrawal, Senior Counsel, ;Sanjay Agrawal, ;Ashutosh Upadhyaya and ;Pankaj Sawant, Advs.

ORDERArun Mishra, J.1. The facts and law being common in both the appeals preferred under clause 10 of the Letters Patent, they were heard analogously and are disposed of by this common order.2. The centripetal issue...