Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: r p agarwal · Page 1 of about 126 results (0.189 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 01 2001

Santosh Kumar Sahu Vs. Official Liquidator

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-01-2001

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]117TAXMAN611(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, for the Assessee Govind Krishna and Bharati Ji Agarwal, for the Revenue

ORDERWe have heard Sri R.P. Agarwal, the learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Govind Krishna, learned advocate and Sri Bharat J. Agarwal, learned senior advocate for the income-tax authorities.2. Pursuant to our order passed on 8-1-2001...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 08 2003

Mohan Lal Agarwal Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-08-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]134TAXMAN230(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal and V.K. Agarwal, for the Assessee Shambhu Chopra, for the Revenue

ORDERDr. B.S. Chauhan, J.This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31-3-2003, by which the learned Revisional. Authority, i.e., Commissioner has disposed of the revision application filed by the petitioner-assessee, under section 264...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 15 2003

Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Gover ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-15-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ490All

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Gupta and ;R.P. Agarwal, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner ANZ Grindlays Bank plc, now Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank, seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 05 2002

Banaras Beads Limited Vs. Prashant Glass Works Private Limited

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-05-2002

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas339(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. This creditors-winding up petition has been filed by Banaras Beads Limited, A-1, Industrial Estate, Varanasi, to wind up Prashant Glass Works Private Limited, with its registered office at Motiwala Industrial Estate, P. O....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2004

In Re: Jaypee Cement Limited; in Re: Jaiprakash Industries Limited

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Mar-10-2004

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 101(2), 103(2), 189, 391, 394, 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 11, 42 and 44

Reported in : [2004]122CompCas854(All); (2004)2CompLJ105(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Verma, Sr. Adv., ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. representing JPC and JPI, ;Navin Sinha, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Mehrotra, Adv. representing HSBL, ;Pankaj Bhatia and ;M.C. Tewari, Advs. representing shareholders and

Sushil Harkauli, J.1. Company Petition No. 26 of 2003 has been filed jointly by the transferee company, namely, Jaypee Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JPC for short) and the transferor company, namely, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 27 1999

Hazi Raunak Ali Khan Vs. Uco Bank, Bulandshahr and Another

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-27-1999

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439, 446(1) and (2), 543 and 583(4); Limitation Act 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 117; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 16(3) and (5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas683(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This is an application to recall the order dated 13.1.1997 whereby this Court allowed the application filed by UCO Bank under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act (in short the Act) against M/s...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 13 2001

In Re: Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-13-2001

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 18 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19; Allahabad Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Rules - Rules 4 to 15

Reported in : (2002)1CompLJ274(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. This company petition has been filed by Dhandhania Brothers (P.) Ltd., with its registered office at 4, Middleton Street, Ground Floor, Calcutta, for winding up Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., with its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 10 2000

Vinay Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-10-2000

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466

Reported in : 2000CriLJ136

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.;Anurag Khanna, Adv. for PICUP ; P.K. Singhal, Adv. for Syndicate Bank;Vikram Nath, Adv. for IIBI ;Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for J.G. Finance Ltd. ; Official Liquidator for company

M.C. Jain, J.1. The company in question, M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited, was ordered to be wound up by order dated August 16, 1999, in this case. There were four other winding up petitions against the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 02 1998

Scientific Instrument Co. Ltd. Vs. Rajendra Prasad Gupta

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-02-1998

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10F, 84, 397, 398 and 399

Reported in : [1999]34CLA36(All); [1999]95CompCas615(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

A.K. Banerji, J. 1. By means of the above-noted appeal filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, the Scientific Instruments Company ('the appellant', in short) has, inter alia, prayed for setting aside the impugned...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 28 2006

Dhankari Investments Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-28-2006

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 226, 256(2), 391, 466, 485(1), 512, 518 and 518(1); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1967 - Sections 307 and 308(2); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985; Companies Act, 1948 - Sections 307

Reported in : [2006]132CompCas749(All); (2006)6CompLJ519(All); [2006]72SCL191(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. Heard Shri R.P. Agarwal, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Shri Arnab Banerjee for the Official Liquidator, U.P. and Uttaranchal.2. Dhankari Investments Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 with its...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial