Advanced Search Results

Santosh Kumar Sahu Vs. Official Liquidator

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2001]117TAXMAN611(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, for the Assessee Govind Krishna and Bharati Ji Agarwal, for the Revenue

ORDERWe have heard Sri R.P. Agarwal, the learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Govind Krishna, learned advocate and Sri Bharat J. Agarwal, learned senior advocate for the income-tax authorities.2. Pursuant to our order passed on 8-1-2001...

Mohan Lal Agarwal Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2004]134TAXMAN230(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal and V.K. Agarwal, for the Assessee Shambhu Chopra, for the Revenue

ORDERDr. B.S. Chauhan, J.This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 31-3-2003, by which the learned Revisional. Authority, i.e., Commissioner has disposed of the revision application filed by the petitioner-assessee, under section 264...

Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Vs. Presiding Officer, Central Gover ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 11A

Reported in : (2003)IIILLJ490All

Advocate for Appellant : S.B. Gupta and ;R.P. Agarwal, Advs.

R.K. Agrawal, J.1. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner ANZ Grindlays Bank plc, now Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank, seeks a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated...

industrial Development Bank of India Vs. Official Liquidator of Modi C ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 446(1), 453, 468, 529A and 537; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 233

Reported in : [1998]91CompCas540(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Sri. R. P. Agarwal

A.K. Banerji, J.1. The abovenoted application A-13 has been filed by the Industrial Development Bank of India (hereinafter referred to as 'the applicant-bank') under Sections 446(1), 453 and 537 of the Companies Act, 1956 ('the Act'...

In Re: Jaypee Cement Limited; in Re: Jaiprakash Industries Limited

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 21, 101(2), 103(2), 189, 391, 394, 397 and 398; Securities and Exchange Board of India (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 - Regulations 11, 42 and 44

Reported in : [2004]122CompCas854(All); (2004)2CompLJ105(All)

Advocate for Appellant : S.N. Verma, Sr. Adv., ;R.P. Agarwal, Adv. representing JPC and JPI, ;Navin Sinha, Sr. Adv., ;S.K. Mehrotra, Adv. representing HSBL, ;Pankaj Bhatia and ;M.C. Tewari, Advs. representing shareholders and

Sushil Harkauli, J.1. Company Petition No. 26 of 2003 has been filed jointly by the transferee company, namely, Jaypee Cement Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as JPC for short) and the transferor company, namely, Jaiprakash Industries Ltd....

Hazi Raunak Ali Khan Vs. Uco Bank, Bulandshahr and Another

Court : Allahabad

Subject : CompanyLimitation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439, 446(1) and (2), 543 and 583(4); Limitation Act 1963 - Schedule - Article 137; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 117; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 22; Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 - Sections 10 and 16(3) and (5); Indian Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 51

Reported in : [1999]97CompCas683(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sudhir Narain, J.1. This is an application to recall the order dated 13.1.1997 whereby this Court allowed the application filed by UCO Bank under Section 446(1) of the Companies Act (in short the Act) against M/s...

In Re: Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 6, 18 and 21; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 19; Allahabad Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) (Amendment) Rules - Rules 4 to 15

Reported in : (2002)1CompLJ274(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J. 1. This company petition has been filed by Dhandhania Brothers (P.) Ltd., with its registered office at 4, Middleton Street, Ground Floor, Calcutta, for winding up Khaitan Overseas and Finance Ltd., with its...

Banaras Beads Limited Vs. Prashant Glass Works Private Limited

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433 and 434(1)

Reported in : [2002]111CompCas339(All)

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

Sunil Ambwani, J.1. This creditors-winding up petition has been filed by Banaras Beads Limited, A-1, Industrial Estate, Varanasi, to wind up Prashant Glass Works Private Limited, with its registered office at Motiwala Industrial Estate, P. O....

Indian Maize and Chemicals Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Official Liquidat ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 529A, 529A(2) and 546; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985

Reported in : [2002]108CompCas401(All); 2002CriLJ32

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.

ORDER1. Heard Sri R.P. Agarwal for the applicant and Sri S.K. Saxena, the official liquidator. 2. This application has been filed for the relief to direct the official liquidator to settle the claims of the workmen...

Vinay Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 466

Reported in : 2000CriLJ136

Advocate for Appellant : R.P. Agarwal, Adv.;Anurag Khanna, Adv. for PICUP ; P.K. Singhal, Adv. for Syndicate Bank;Vikram Nath, Adv. for IIBI ;Pradeep Agarwal, Adv. for J.G. Finance Ltd. ; Official Liquidator for company

M.C. Jain, J.1. The company in question, M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited, was ordered to be wound up by order dated August 16, 1999, in this case. There were four other winding up petitions against the...