Advanced Search Results

Ashok Kumar Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992RLR529

Advocate for Appellant : Rani Jethmalani and; R.N. Kapur, Advs

Usha Mehra, J.(1) Normally bail when granted is not to be cancelled unless there are very cogent and overwhelming circumstances. The grounds for cancellation of bail are; interference or attempt to interfere with the due course...

Bennehard J. Framous @ Ortege Francis Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : CustomsCriminal

Acts : Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 21 and 55

Reported in : 1992CriLJ4009; 1992(2)Crimes788; 48(1992)DLT370

Advocate for Appellant : D.N. Goverdhan and; R.N. Kapur, Advs

P.K. Bahri, J.(1) The appellant Bennehard J. Framous @ Ortege Francis, a French national, who had come to India as a tourist, has been convicted vide judgment dated April 26, 1989, of an Additional Sessions Judge,...

Modern Threads (India) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2000)243ITR60(JP.)

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the CIT(A), Jaipur dt. 11th March, 1997. The appellant has taken the following grounds in this appeal : 1. That, on the...

Sh. Ashok Kumar Vs. State and Another

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992CriLJ3821

Advocate for Appellant : Ms. Rani Jethmalani, Adv

ORDER1. Normally bail when granted is not to be cancelled unless there are very cogent and overwhelming circumstances. The grounds for cancellation of bail are; interference or attempt to interfere with the due course of administration...

Rajender Jaina Vs. National Federation of the Blind and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Mr. Santosh Srivastava

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA4962005 Date of decision:2. d February, 2015 % RAJENDER JAINA Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Rajesh Aggarwal, Mr. Santosh Srivastava, Advs. along with appellant in...

Amarjit Singh Vs. R.N. Gupta

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 - Sections 13A2(1) and 13A2(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3, 59 and 61

Reported in : 1995(4)BomCR538

Advocate for Appellant : Anita A. Agarwal, Adv.

R.G. Vaidyanatha, J. 1. This is a revision petition filed against the order dated 24-3-1995 in Application No. 41 of 1994 on the file of Competent Authority (Rent Act), Konkan Division, Bombay. Heard both the sides.2....

Modern Threads (i) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1999)69ITD115(JP.)

1. This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the CIT(A), Jaipur dated 11-3-97. The appellant has taken the following grounds in this appeal :- 1. That on the facts and...

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. RamnaraIn Kapur and Co. Pvt. Lt ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10

Reported in : [1968]69ITR719(Bom)

Advocate for Appellant : G.N. Joshi, Adv.

Kotval, C.J. 1. The following question has been referred under section 66(1) of the Indian Income-tax Act for our decision : 'Whether the inference of the Tribunal that the profits of Rs. 52,075 and Rs. 29,035...

Kapur Weaving Factory Vs. the State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Sales Tax

Reported in : [1980]46STC494(P& H)

Advocate for Appellant : B.K. Jhingan, Adv.

M.R. Sharma, J.1. The Sales Tax Tribunal, Punjab, has referred the following question of law to us for our. opinion under Section 22(1) of the Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 (hereinafter called the Act):Whether, on...

Jagmohan Alias Jaggu Vs. Commissioner of Police, Delhi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : National Security Act, 1950 - Sections 3 and 3(2)

Reported in : 1982CriLJ1474; 22(1982)DLT29; 1982RLR439

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Kapur and; S.T. Singh, Advs

Charanjit Talwar, J.(1) Jagmohan @ Jaggu has challenged his detention under Section 3(2) of the National Security Act (herein called 'the Act'). The order of detention bearing (No. F. 91/D/LA/Judl.) 81/1161-63 was pas. sed by the...