Advanced Search Results
Santosh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Aug-29-2001
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 91, 161(3), 161, 162, 162(1), 174 and 207; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 145
2002CriLJ1180; 2001(4)MPHT63(CG)
R.N. Jha, Adv.
ORDERR.S. Garg, J. 1. The applicant being aggrieved by the order dated 6-7-2001 passed by the learned Third Additional Sessions Judge, Jagdalpur in Sessions Trial No. 297 of 2001 rejecting the applicant's application filed under Section...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSallamuddIn Vs. State
Delhi
Mar-04-2013
Criminal
Ms. Kanchan Kumari, Mr. R.N. Jha
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 954/2012 and Crl. M.B. No. 2118/2012 Reserved on:21. t February, 2013 Decided on:4. h March, 2013 % SALLAMUDDIN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Kanchan Kumari...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTejram Rathore Vs. Sanjog Bareth and ors.
Chhattisgarh
Jun-15-2009
Motor Vehicles
2009(5)MPHT56(CG)
Shri. R.N. Jha
ORDERRajeev Gupta, C.J.1. Heard on admission.2. Appellant/claimant Tejram Rathore is seeking enhancement of the compensation awarded by the Second Additional Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (FTC), Janjgir Champa (for short 'the Tribunal') vide award dated 22-4-2009, passed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Kailash Lodhi and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
Sep-12-2008
Criminal
2008(5)MPHT28(CG)
Shri. R.N. Jha
Sunil Kumar Sinha, J.1. Challenge is made to the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 16-1-2003 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon in Sessions Trial No. 114/2002, whereby, the appellants have...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Insurance Co Ltd Vs. Prahlad Sahu and Another
Chhattisgarh
Jan-03-2012
Land Acquisition
Shri. Pankaj Agrawal
Oral Award (APPEAL UNDER SECTION 173 OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT) 1. This is insurer's appeal against the award dated 30th July, 2010 passed by the Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (FTC), Khairagarh (for short `the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSatish Kumar David and anr. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh
Chhattisgarh
May-20-2002
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 201, 302, 376 and 377; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 439; Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Sections 3(2)(5)
2002(5)MPHT22
R.N. Jha, Adv.
ORDERFakhruddin, J.1. Though Counsel for the State was having the earlier order passed by this Court on 26-3-2002 but has not produced the same. Not only this, none of the Counsel for parties have disclosed that...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUmesh Kumar and Heera Lal Soni Vs. the State of Bihar
Patna
Mar-20-2007
Criminal
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 18, 21, 41, 42, 43, 50 and 54; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
Suraj Nr. Pd. Sinha, Sr. Adv., Jitendra Nr. Sinha and Anup Kumar, Advs.
Ghanshyam Prasad, J.1. Both the aforementioned appeals arise out of one and the same judgment of conviction and sentence dated 15.7.2004/17.7.2004 passed by Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Sasaram in Dehri P.S. Case No. 196 of 2001...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew Standard Engineering Co. Ltd. Vs. Steel Authority of India
Mumbai
Sep-05-2008
Contract
Public Sector Iron and Steel Companies (Restructuring) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1978 - Sections 23; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2 and 18; Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 5, 34 and 35; Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; Minimum Wages Act - Sections 3
2009(1)BomCR112
U.J. Makhija, Sr. Cou. and ;M.G. Mimani, Adv.
Vazifdar S.J., J.1. The suit is filed to recover a sum of Rs. 44,65,613.61 together with interest on Rs. 36,99,287.87 at the rate of 15% per annum from the date of the suit till payment. The...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRakesh Kumar Vs. State
Delhi
Dec-12-2003
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC) - 120B, 363, 364A, 384, 366, 420, 468, 471 and 506; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 164 and 313
109(2004)DLT826; 2004(72)DRJ311
Inspector O.P. Arora (Vigilance) in CRLA 68/200; Arvind Singh, Adv. in CRLA 68/2002,; K.B. Andley, Sr. A
O.P. Dwivedi, J. CRLA 68-91-103/2002 1. These appeals are directed against the judgment of conviction dated 14.1.2002 whereby appellant Rakesh Kumar was found guilty of offence u/s 420/ 468/ 471/ 363/ 366/506/384/120B IPC and the remaining...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›